Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c

between commit:

  c74dc8ab47c1 ("scsi: ufs: core: Fix a race condition related to the "hid" attribute group")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  f46b9a595fa9 ("scsi: ufs: core: Allocate the SCSI host earlier")

from the scsi-mkp tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index c76d8c65ef46,ca17165f6f0e..000000000000
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@@ -10892,12 -10939,8 +10940,8 @@@ initialized
  	if (err)
  		goto out_disable;
  
- 	err = ufshcd_add_scsi_host(hba);
- 	if (err)
- 		goto out_disable;
- 
 -	async_schedule(ufshcd_async_scan, hba);
  	ufs_sysfs_add_nodes(hba->dev);
 +	async_schedule(ufshcd_async_scan, hba);
  
  	device_enable_async_suspend(dev);
  	ufshcd_pm_qos_init(hba);

On 11/13/25 7:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    c74dc8ab47c1 ("scsi: ufs: core: Fix a race condition related to the "hid" attribute group")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>    f46b9a595fa9 ("scsi: ufs: core: Allocate the SCSI host earlier")
> 
> from the scsi-mkp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks Stephen for having resolved this merge conflict. The conflict
resolution looks good to me.

Thanks,

Bart.