Hi Biju,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 at 11:52, Biju <biju.das.au@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
>
> Drop rsci_clear_CFC() by reusing rsci_clear_SCxSR() as the contents of
> both functions are the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/rsci.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/rsci.c
> @@ -199,11 +199,6 @@ static unsigned int rsci_get_mctrl(struct uart_port *port)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void rsci_clear_CFC(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int mask)
> -{
> - rsci_serial_out(port, CFCLR, mask);
> -}
> -
This function is indeed identical to rsci_clear_SCxSR(), so
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
However, while the sci_port_ops method is indeed called .clear_SCxSR(),
I think it makes more sense to drop rsci_clear_SCxSR() instead, as this
function touches the CFC register...
> static void rsci_start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> struct sci_port *sp = to_sci_port(port);
> @@ -275,7 +270,7 @@ static void rsci_transmit_chars(struct uart_port *port)
> break;
> }
>
> - rsci_clear_CFC(port, CFCLR_TDREC);
> + rsci_clear_SCxSR(port, CFCLR_TDREC);
... and it is called directly.
> rsci_serial_out(port, TDR, c);
>
> port->icount.tx++;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds