fs/btrfs/bio.c | 2 +- fs/btrfs/bio.h | 1 - fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
We don't need the completion csum_done which marks the csum work
has been executed. We can simply flush_work() instead.
This way we can slim down the btrfs_bio structure by 32 bytes matching
it's size to what it used to be before introducing the async csums.
Hence not making any change with respect to the structure size.
---
This is a simple fixup for "btrfs: introduce btrfs_bio::async_csum" in
for-next and can be squashed into it.
---
fs/btrfs/bio.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/bio.h | 1 -
fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
index a73652b8724a..fd6e4278a62f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void btrfs_bio_end_io(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, blk_status_t status)
ASSERT(in_task());
if (bbio->async_csum)
- wait_for_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
+ flush_work(&bbio->csum_work);
bbio->bio.bi_status = status;
if (bbio->bio.bi_pool == &btrfs_clone_bioset) {
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.h b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
index deaeea3becf4..0b09d9122fa2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/bio.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct btrfs_bio {
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
struct work_struct csum_work;
- struct completion csum_done;
struct bvec_iter csum_saved_iter;
u64 orig_physical;
};
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index 72be3ede0edf..3e9241f360c8 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ static void csum_one_bio_work(struct work_struct *work)
ASSERT(btrfs_op(&bbio->bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE);
ASSERT(bbio->async_csum == true);
csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->csum_saved_iter);
- complete(&bbio->csum_done);
}
/*
@@ -805,6 +804,7 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
struct bio *bio = &bbio->bio;
struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq;
unsigned nofs_flag;
nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
@@ -825,11 +825,11 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->bio.bi_iter);
return 0;
}
- init_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
bbio->async_csum = true;
bbio->csum_saved_iter = bbio->bio.bi_iter;
INIT_WORK(&bbio->csum_work, csum_one_bio_work);
- schedule_work(&bbio->csum_work);
+ wq = bio->bi_opf & REQ_META? fs_info->endio_meta_workers: fs_info->endio_workers;
+ queue_work(wq, &bbio->csum_work);
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
在 2025/11/13 20:01, Daniel Vacek 写道:
> We don't need the completion csum_done which marks the csum work
> has been executed. We can simply flush_work() instead.
>
> This way we can slim down the btrfs_bio structure by 32 bytes matching
> it's size to what it used to be before introducing the async csums.
> Hence not making any change with respect to the structure size.
> ---
> This is a simple fixup for "btrfs: introduce btrfs_bio::async_csum" in
> for-next and can be squashed into it.
> ---
> fs/btrfs/bio.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/bio.h | 1 -
> fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> index a73652b8724a..fd6e4278a62f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void btrfs_bio_end_io(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, blk_status_t status)
> ASSERT(in_task());
>
> if (bbio->async_csum)
> - wait_for_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> + flush_work(&bbio->csum_work);
>
> bbio->bio.bi_status = status;
> if (bbio->bio.bi_pool == &btrfs_clone_bioset) {
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.h b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> index deaeea3becf4..0b09d9122fa2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct btrfs_bio {
> struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
> struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
> struct work_struct csum_work;
> - struct completion csum_done;
> struct bvec_iter csum_saved_iter;
> u64 orig_physical;
> };
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index 72be3ede0edf..3e9241f360c8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ static void csum_one_bio_work(struct work_struct *work)
> ASSERT(btrfs_op(&bbio->bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE);
> ASSERT(bbio->async_csum == true);
> csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->csum_saved_iter);
> - complete(&bbio->csum_done);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -805,6 +804,7 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
> struct bio *bio = &bbio->bio;
> struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
> + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> unsigned nofs_flag;
>
> nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
> @@ -825,11 +825,11 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
> csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->bio.bi_iter);
> return 0;
> }
> - init_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> bbio->async_csum = true;
> bbio->csum_saved_iter = bbio->bio.bi_iter;
> INIT_WORK(&bbio->csum_work, csum_one_bio_work);
> - schedule_work(&bbio->csum_work);
> + wq = bio->bi_opf & REQ_META? fs_info->endio_meta_workers: fs_info->endio_workers;
Metadata will not go into btrfs_csum_one_bio(), thus it's fixed to
endio_workers().
> + queue_work(wq, &bbio->csum_work);
> return 0;
> }
>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 at 10:44, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
> 在 2025/11/13 20:01, Daniel Vacek 写道:
> > We don't need the completion csum_done which marks the csum work
> > has been executed. We can simply flush_work() instead.
> >
> > This way we can slim down the btrfs_bio structure by 32 bytes matching
> > it's size to what it used to be before introducing the async csums.
> > Hence not making any change with respect to the structure size.
> > ---
> > This is a simple fixup for "btrfs: introduce btrfs_bio::async_csum" in
> > for-next and can be squashed into it.
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/bio.c | 2 +-
> > fs/btrfs/bio.h | 1 -
> > fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 +++---
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> > index a73652b8724a..fd6e4278a62f 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void btrfs_bio_end_io(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, blk_status_t status)
> > ASSERT(in_task());
> >
> > if (bbio->async_csum)
> > - wait_for_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> > + flush_work(&bbio->csum_work);
> >
> > bbio->bio.bi_status = status;
> > if (bbio->bio.bi_pool == &btrfs_clone_bioset) {
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.h b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> > index deaeea3becf4..0b09d9122fa2 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> > @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct btrfs_bio {
> > struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
> > struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
> > struct work_struct csum_work;
> > - struct completion csum_done;
> > struct bvec_iter csum_saved_iter;
> > u64 orig_physical;
> > };
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> > index 72be3ede0edf..3e9241f360c8 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> > @@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ static void csum_one_bio_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > ASSERT(btrfs_op(&bbio->bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE);
> > ASSERT(bbio->async_csum == true);
> > csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->csum_saved_iter);
> > - complete(&bbio->csum_done);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -805,6 +804,7 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
> > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
> > struct bio *bio = &bbio->bio;
> > struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
> > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > unsigned nofs_flag;
> >
> > nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
> > @@ -825,11 +825,11 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
> > csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->bio.bi_iter);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > - init_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> > bbio->async_csum = true;
> > bbio->csum_saved_iter = bbio->bio.bi_iter;
> > INIT_WORK(&bbio->csum_work, csum_one_bio_work);
> > - schedule_work(&bbio->csum_work);
> > + wq = bio->bi_opf & REQ_META? fs_info->endio_meta_workers: fs_info->endio_workers;
>
> Metadata will not go into btrfs_csum_one_bio(), thus it's fixed to
> endio_workers().
I suspected, but I was not sure so rather be safe than sorry.
That simplifies it quite nicely. Thanks.
> > + queue_work(wq, &bbio->csum_work);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.