[PATCH v5 0/2] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add Device Tree for Facebook Anacapa BMC

Peter Shen posted 2 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
Only 0 patches received!
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v5 0/2] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add Device Tree for Facebook Anacapa BMC
Posted by Peter Shen 1 month, 1 week ago
This patch series adds the device tree binding and the initial device tree
source file for the Facebook Anacapa BMC, which utilizes the Aspeed AST2600
SoC.

The patches configure the necessary platform peripherals and aliases for
OpenBMC usage.

---
Changes in v5:
- Fixed the final DCO mismatch (Broken DCO/email chain). The email sender address (From:) is now corrected to fully match the Signed-off-by: and Author: address (sjg168@gmail.com) to comply with DCO rules.

- (V4 Changelog) Corrected all previous style issues: fixed block comment styles, line length issues, and removed un-documented/unused device tree nodes (amd,helios_cpld and eeprom@53).
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add Device Tree for Facebook Anacapa BMC
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 1 week ago
On 07/11/2025 09:22, Peter Shen wrote:
> This patch series adds the device tree binding and the initial device tree
> source file for the Facebook Anacapa BMC, which utilizes the Aspeed AST2600
> SoC.
> 
> The patches configure the necessary platform peripherals and aliases for
> OpenBMC usage.
> 
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Fixed the final DCO mismatch (Broken DCO/email chain). The email sender address (From:) is now corrected to fully match the Signed-off-by: and Author: address (sjg168@gmail.com) to comply with DCO rules.
> 
> - (V4 Changelog) Corrected all previous style issues: fixed block comment styles, line length issues, and removed un-documented/unused device tree nodes (amd,helios_cpld and eeprom@53).

Please stop. You already sent v4, then immediately v5. All patches are
missing and cover letters are incorrectly threaded.

Can you please slow down and look at commands you are typing (e.g. look
in manual for explanation of --dry-run).

Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
interfere with applying entire sets. See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc2/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L830


Best regards,
Krzysztof