[PATCH v3 20/21] pmdomain: mediatek: Add bus protect control flow for MT8189

irving.ch.lin posted 21 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 20/21] pmdomain: mediatek: Add bus protect control flow for MT8189
Posted by irving.ch.lin 1 month, 1 week ago
From: Irving-CH Lin <irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com>

In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy separates
into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled, and another
need to enable after subsys clocks enable.

Signed-off-by: Irving-CH Lin <irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  5 ++++
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index 164c6b519af3..222846e52daf 100644
--- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_set(struct scpsys_domain *pd,
 					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
 }
 
-static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
+static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8 flags)
 {
 	for (int i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
 		const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data->bp_cfg[i];
@@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
 		if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
 			break;
 
+		if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=
+		    (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
+			continue;
+
 		if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
 			ret = scpsys_bus_protect_clear(pd, bpd);
 		else
@@ -270,7 +274,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
+static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8 flags)
 {
 	for (int i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
 		const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data->bp_cfg[i];
@@ -279,6 +283,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
 		if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
 			continue;
 
+		if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=
+		    (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
+			continue;
+
 		if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
 			ret = scpsys_bus_protect_set(pd, bpd);
 		else
@@ -632,6 +640,15 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_pwr_ack;
 
+	/*
+	 * In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy separates
+	 * into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled, and another
+	 * need to enable after subsys clocks enable.
+	 */
+	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto err_pwr_ack;
+
 	/*
 	 * In few Mediatek platforms(e.g. MT6779), the bus protect policy is
 	 * stricter, which leads to bus protect release must be prior to bus
@@ -648,7 +665,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_disable_subsys_clks;
 
-	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd);
+	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, 0);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_disable_sram;
 
@@ -662,7 +679,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	return 0;
 
 err_enable_bus_protect:
-	scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
+	scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
 err_disable_sram:
 	scpsys_sram_disable(pd);
 err_disable_subsys_clks:
@@ -683,7 +700,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	bool tmp;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
+	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -697,6 +714,10 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 
 	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks);
 
+	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_MODEM_PWRSEQ))
 		scpsys_modem_pwrseq_off(pd);
 	else
diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
index f608e6ec4744..a5dca24cbc2f 100644
--- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
+++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_flags {
 	BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE = BIT(1),
 	BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK = BIT(2),
 	BUS_PROT_INVERTED = BIT(3),
+	BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK = BIT(4),
 };
 
 enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
@@ -95,6 +96,10 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
 		_BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta,	\
 			  BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
 
+#define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN_SUBCLK(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
+		_BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta,	\
+			  BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK | BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK)
+
 #define BUS_PROT_INFRA_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)			\
 		BUS_PROT_UPDATE(INFRA, _mask,			\
 				INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN,		\
-- 
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH v3 20/21] pmdomain: mediatek: Add bus protect control flow for MT8189
Posted by AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 1 month, 1 week ago
Il 06/11/25 13:42, irving.ch.lin ha scritto:
> From: Irving-CH Lin <irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com>
> 
> In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy separates
> into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled, and another
> need to enable after subsys clocks enable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Irving-CH Lin <irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++----
>   drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  5 ++++
>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> index 164c6b519af3..222846e52daf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_set(struct scpsys_domain *pd,
>   					MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>   }
>   
> -static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> +static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8 flags)
>   {
>   	for (int i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
>   		const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data->bp_cfg[i];
> @@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>   		if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
>   			break;
>   
> +		if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=
> +		    (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
> +			continue;
> +
>   		if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
>   			ret = scpsys_bus_protect_clear(pd, bpd);
>   		else
> @@ -270,7 +274,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> +static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8 flags)
>   {
>   	for (int i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>   		const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data->bp_cfg[i];
> @@ -279,6 +283,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>   		if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
>   			continue;
>   
> +		if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=

Is that the right name for this flag?

As far as I understand, you have to set bus protection in two steps, right?
So in the first step you're setting bus protection for the MM_INFRA and for
MM_INFRA_2ND - and in the second step you're setting MM_INFRA_IGN and 2_IGN.

So the first step (the prots with BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) unlocks SUBSYS clks
and SRAM ISO access, the second one does the rest.

I think that a better name for this, at this point would be...

if ((bpd->flags & local_flags) & BUS_PROT_SRAM_PROTECTION)
	continue;

What do you think?

Regards,
Angelo

> +		    (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
> +			continue;
> +
>   		if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
>   			ret = scpsys_bus_protect_set(pd, bpd);
>   		else
> @@ -632,6 +640,15 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto err_pwr_ack;
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy separates
> +	 * into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled, and another
> +	 * need to enable after subsys clocks enable.
> +	 */
> +	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto err_pwr_ack;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * In few Mediatek platforms(e.g. MT6779), the bus protect policy is
>   	 * stricter, which leads to bus protect release must be prior to bus
> @@ -648,7 +665,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		goto err_disable_subsys_clks;
>   
> -	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd);
> +	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, 0);
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		goto err_disable_sram;
>   
> @@ -662,7 +679,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   	return 0;
>   
>   err_enable_bus_protect:
> -	scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
> +	scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
>   err_disable_sram:
>   	scpsys_sram_disable(pd);
>   err_disable_subsys_clks:
> @@ -683,7 +700,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   	bool tmp;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
> +	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		return ret;
>   
> @@ -697,6 +714,10 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>   
>   	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks);
>   
> +	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
>   	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_MODEM_PWRSEQ))
>   		scpsys_modem_pwrseq_off(pd);
>   	else
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> index f608e6ec4744..a5dca24cbc2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_flags {
>   	BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE = BIT(1),
>   	BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK = BIT(2),
>   	BUS_PROT_INVERTED = BIT(3),
> +	BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK = BIT(4),
>   };
>   
>   enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
> @@ -95,6 +96,10 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
>   		_BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta,	\
>   			  BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
>   
> +#define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN_SUBCLK(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta)		\
> +		_BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta,	\
> +			  BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK | BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK)
> +
>   #define BUS_PROT_INFRA_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)			\
>   		BUS_PROT_UPDATE(INFRA, _mask,			\
>   				INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN,		\
Re: [PATCH v3 20/21] pmdomain: mediatek: Add bus protect control flow for MT8189
Posted by Irving-CH Lin (林建弘) 1 week, 2 days ago
Hi Angelo,

On Fri, 2025-11-07 at 11:36 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> Il 06/11/25 13:42, irving.ch.lin ha scritto:
> > From: Irving-CH Lin <irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy separates
> > into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled, and
> > another
> > need to enable after subsys clocks enable.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Irving-CH Lin <irving-ch.lin@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 31
> > ++++++++++++++++++----
> >   drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  5 ++++
> >   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > index 164c6b519af3..222846e52daf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_set(struct
> > scpsys_domain *pd,
> >                                       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US,
> > MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> >   }
> > 
> > -static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> > +static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8
> > flags)
> >   {
> >       for (int i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> >               const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data-
> > >bp_cfg[i];
> > @@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct
> > scpsys_domain *pd)
> >               if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
> >                       break;
> > 
> > +             if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=
> > +                 (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> >               if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
> >                       ret = scpsys_bus_protect_clear(pd, bpd);
> >               else
> > @@ -270,7 +274,7 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct
> > scpsys_domain *pd)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> > 
> > -static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
> > +static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd, u8
> > flags)
> >   {
> >       for (int i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> >               const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = &pd->data-
> > >bp_cfg[i];
> > @@ -279,6 +283,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct
> > scpsys_domain *pd)
> >               if (!bpd->bus_prot_set_clr_mask)
> >                       continue;
> > 
> > +             if ((bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) !=
> 
> Is that the right name for this flag?
> 
> As far as I understand, you have to set bus protection in two steps,
> right?
> So in the first step you're setting bus protection for the MM_INFRA
> and for
> MM_INFRA_2ND - and in the second step you're setting MM_INFRA_IGN and
> 2_IGN.
> 
> So the first step (the prots with BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK) unlocks
> SUBSYS clks
> and SRAM ISO access, the second one does the rest.
> 
> I think that a better name for this, at this point would be...
> 
> if ((bpd->flags & local_flags) & BUS_PROT_SRAM_PROTECTION)
>         continue;
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo
> 
Yes, the purpose is to set bus with two steps:
In general case, bus protection needs to control after subsys clock
enabled. But on MT8189 MM_INFRA subsys, some bus protection set before
subsys clock enabled.

So here i name bus protection setting w/o subsys clock as
IGNORE_SUBCLK.

thanks

BR,
irving

> > +                 (flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK))
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> >               if (bpd->flags & BUS_PROT_INVERTED)
> >                       ret = scpsys_bus_protect_set(pd, bpd);
> >               else
> > @@ -632,6 +640,15 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct
> > generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >       if (ret)
> >               goto err_pwr_ack;
> > 
> > +     /*
> > +      * In MT8189 mminfra power domain, the bus protect policy
> > separates
> > +      * into two parts, one is set before subsys clocks enabled,
> > and another
> > +      * need to enable after subsys clocks enable.
> > +      */
> > +     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
> > +     if (ret < 0)
> > +             goto err_pwr_ack;
> > +
> >       /*
> >        * In few Mediatek platforms(e.g. MT6779), the bus protect
> > policy is
> >        * stricter, which leads to bus protect release must be prior
> > to bus
> > @@ -648,7 +665,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct
> > generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >       if (ret < 0)
> >               goto err_disable_subsys_clks;
> > 
> > -     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd);
> > +     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd, 0);
> >       if (ret < 0)
> >               goto err_disable_sram;
> > 
> > @@ -662,7 +679,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct
> > generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >       return 0;
> > 
> >   err_enable_bus_protect:
> > -     scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
> > +     scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
> >   err_disable_sram:
> >       scpsys_sram_disable(pd);
> >   err_disable_subsys_clks:
> > @@ -683,7 +700,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct
> > generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >       bool tmp;
> >       int ret;
> > 
> > -     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd);
> > +     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, 0);
> >       if (ret < 0)
> >               return ret;
> > 
> > @@ -697,6 +714,10 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct
> > generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> > 
> >       clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd-
> > >subsys_clks);
> > 
> > +     ret = scpsys_bus_protect_enable(pd, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK);
> > +     if (ret < 0)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> >       if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_MODEM_PWRSEQ))
> >               scpsys_modem_pwrseq_off(pd);
> >       else
> > diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > index f608e6ec4744..a5dca24cbc2f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_flags {
> >       BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE = BIT(1),
> >       BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK = BIT(2),
> >       BUS_PROT_INVERTED = BIT(3),
> > +     BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK = BIT(4),
> >   };
> > 
> >   enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
> > @@ -95,6 +96,10 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_block {
> >               _BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask,
> > _sta,        \
> >                         BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
> > 
> > +#define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN_SUBCLK(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr,
> > _sta)               \
> > +             _BUS_PROT(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _mask,
> > _sta,        \
> > +                       BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK |
> > BUS_PROT_IGNORE_SUBCLK)
> > +
> >   #define BUS_PROT_INFRA_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask)                 \
> >               BUS_PROT_UPDATE(INFRA, _mask,                   \
> >                               INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN,         \
> 
>