There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK message. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <coking@nvidia.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
index dd4c35c0e428..04f9a5e73e5e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void test_xsk(const struct test_spec *test_to_run, enum test_mode mode)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ifobj_rx, "create ifobj_rx"))
 		goto delete_tx;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "conigure ifobj"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "configure ifobj"))
 		goto delete_rx;
 
 	ret = get_hw_ring_size(ifobj_tx->ifname, &ifobj_tx->ring);
-- 
2.51.0

On 11/6/25 3:04 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK message. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <coking@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
> index dd4c35c0e428..04f9a5e73e5e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void test_xsk(const struct test_spec *test_to_run, enum test_mode mode)
>   	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ifobj_rx, "create ifobj_rx"))
>   		goto delete_tx;
>   
> -	if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "conigure ifobj"))
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "configure ifobj"))

Please squash with another typo fixes (https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251106110016.15960-1-coking@nvidia.com/)
into one single patch and use the "bpf-next" tag.

pw-bot: cr
>   		goto delete_rx;
>   
>   	ret = get_hw_ring_size(ifobj_tx->ifname, &ifobj_tx->ring);