drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
ie31200_register_mci() calls device_initialize() for priv->dev
unconditionally. However, in the error path, put_device() is not
called, leading to an imbalance. Similarly, in the unload path,
put_device() is missing.
Although edac_mc_free() eventually frees the memory, it does not
release the device initialized by device_initialize(). For code
readability and proper pairing of device_initialize()/put_device(),
add put_device() calls in both error and unload paths.
Found by code review.
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
---
Changes in v3:
- moved put_device() from fail_free to fail_unmap to avoid using uninitialized priv variable when window allocation fails.
Changes in v2:
- modified the patch, thanks for developer's suggestions;
- removed Fixes line.
---
drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c
index 5a080ab65476..8d4ddaa85ae8 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/ie31200_edac.c
@@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static int ie31200_register_mci(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct res_config *cfg, in
ie31200_pvt.priv[mc] = priv;
return 0;
fail_unmap:
+ put_device(&priv->dev);
iounmap(window);
fail_free:
edac_mc_free(mci);
@@ -598,6 +599,7 @@ static void ie31200_unregister_mcis(void)
mci = priv->mci;
edac_mc_del_mc(mci->pdev);
iounmap(priv->window);
+ put_device(&priv->dev);
edac_mc_free(mci);
}
}
--
2.17.1
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 04:47:35PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote: > ie31200_register_mci() calls device_initialize() for priv->dev > unconditionally. However, in the error path, put_device() is not > called, leading to an imbalance. Similarly, in the unload path, > put_device() is missing. > > Although edac_mc_free() eventually frees the memory, it does not > release the device initialized by device_initialize(). For code > readability and proper pairing of device_initialize()/put_device(), > add put_device() calls in both error and unload paths. > > Found by code review. > > Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn> Applied v3 version. Thanks -Tony
> From: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn> > Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2025 4:48 PM > To: jbaron@akamai.com; bp@alien8.de; Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com>; > Zhuo, Qiuxu <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> > Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; akpm@linux- > foundation.org; Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn> > Subject: [PATCH v3] EDAC/ie31200: Fix error handling in ie31200_register_mci > > ie31200_register_mci() calls device_initialize() for priv->dev unconditionally. > However, in the error path, put_device() is not called, leading to an > imbalance. Similarly, in the unload path, > put_device() is missing. > > Although edac_mc_free() eventually frees the memory, it does not release the > device initialized by device_initialize(). For code readability and proper pairing > of device_initialize()/put_device(), add put_device() calls in both error and > unload paths. > > Found by code review. > > Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn> > --- > Changes in v3: > - moved put_device() from fail_free to fail_unmap to avoid using uninitialized > priv variable when window allocation fails. Oops ... I didn't catch that during v2 review. For v3: Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> > [...]
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 04:47:35PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> ie31200_register_mci() calls device_initialize() for priv->dev
> unconditionally. However, in the error path, put_device() is not
> called, leading to an imbalance. Similarly, in the unload path,
> put_device() is missing.
>
> Although edac_mc_free() eventually frees the memory, it does not
> release the device initialized by device_initialize(). For code
> readability and proper pairing of device_initialize()/put_device(),
> add put_device() calls in both error and unload paths.
>
> Found by code review.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - moved put_device() from fail_free to fail_unmap to avoid using uninitialized priv variable when window allocation fails.
Zapped v2 from the tree for the time being.
> Changes in v2:
> - modified the patch, thanks for developer's suggestions;
> - removed Fixes line.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.