Sphinx reports kernel-doc warnings when making htmldocs:
WARNING: ./drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h:361 function parameter 'bitnr' not described in 'pt_test_sw_bit_acquire'
WARNING: ./drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h:371 function parameter 'bitnr' not described in 'pt_set_sw_bit_release'
Describe @bitnr to squash them.
Fixes: bcc64b57b48e ("iommupt: Add basic support for SW bits in the page table")
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
---
drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h
index b5628f47e0db40..54c16355be2842 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h
@@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static inline unsigned int pt_max_sw_bit(struct pt_common *common);
/**
* pt_test_sw_bit_acquire() - Read a software bit in an item
* @pts: Entry to set
+ * @bitnr: Bit to set
*
* Software bits are ignored by HW and can be used for any purpose by the
* software. This does a test bit and acquire operation.
@@ -364,6 +365,7 @@ static inline bool pt_test_sw_bit_acquire(struct pt_state *pts,
/**
* pt_set_sw_bit_release() - Set a software bit in an item
* @pts: Entry to set
+ * @bitnr: Bit to set
*
* Software bits are ignored by HW and can be used for any purpose by the
* software. This does a set bit and release operation.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On 11/5/25 11:38 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Sphinx reports kernel-doc warnings when making htmldocs:
>
> WARNING: ./drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h:361 function parameter 'bitnr' not described in 'pt_test_sw_bit_acquire'
> WARNING: ./drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h:371 function parameter 'bitnr' not described in 'pt_set_sw_bit_release'
>
> Describe @bitnr to squash them.
>
> Fixes: bcc64b57b48e ("iommupt: Add basic support for SW bits in the page table")
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h
> index b5628f47e0db40..54c16355be2842 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h
> @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static inline unsigned int pt_max_sw_bit(struct pt_common *common);
> /**
> * pt_test_sw_bit_acquire() - Read a software bit in an item
> * @pts: Entry to set
> + * @bitnr: Bit to set
Shouldn't both of these (above) to "to read" instead of "to set"?
> *
> * Software bits are ignored by HW and can be used for any purpose by the
> * software. This does a test bit and acquire operation.
> @@ -364,6 +365,7 @@ static inline bool pt_test_sw_bit_acquire(struct pt_state *pts,
> /**
> * pt_set_sw_bit_release() - Set a software bit in an item
> * @pts: Entry to set
> + * @bitnr: Bit to set
> *
> * Software bits are ignored by HW and can be used for any purpose by the
> * software. This does a set bit and release operation.
--
~Randy
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 03:48:10PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h > > index b5628f47e0db40..54c16355be2842 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h > > @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static inline unsigned int pt_max_sw_bit(struct pt_common *common); > > /** > > * pt_test_sw_bit_acquire() - Read a software bit in an item > > * @pts: Entry to set > > + * @bitnr: Bit to set > > Shouldn't both of these (above) to "to read" instead of "to set"? Yes, that's right, Bagas could you fold that into a v2? Jason
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 08:35:41PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 03:48:10PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h > > > index b5628f47e0db40..54c16355be2842 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/generic_pt/pt_common.h > > > @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static inline unsigned int pt_max_sw_bit(struct pt_common *common); > > > /** > > > * pt_test_sw_bit_acquire() - Read a software bit in an item > > > * @pts: Entry to set > > > + * @bitnr: Bit to set > > > > Shouldn't both of these (above) to "to read" instead of "to set"? > > Yes, that's right, Bagas could you fold that into a v2? OK, thanks! -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.