Documentation: btt: Unwrap bit 31-30 nested table

[PATCH] Documentation: btt: Unwrap bit 31-30 nested table

Posted by Bagas Sanjaya 3 months ago

Bit 31-30 usage table is already formatted as reST simple table, but it
is wrapped in literal code block instead. Unwrap it.

Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
index 107395c042ae07..2d8269f834bd60 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ flags, and the remaining form the internal block number.
 ======== =============================================================
 Bit      Description
 ======== =============================================================
-31 - 30	 Error and Zero flags - Used in the following way::
+31 - 30	 Error and Zero flags - Used in the following way:
 
 	   == ==  ====================================================
 	   31 30  Description

base-commit: 27600b51fbc8b9a4eba18c8d88d7edb146605f3f
-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: btt: Unwrap bit 31-30 nested table

Posted by Randy Dunlap 3 months ago


On 11/5/25 4:47 AM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Bit 31-30 usage table is already formatted as reST simple table, but it
> is wrapped in literal code block instead. Unwrap it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

LGTM. Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>


> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
> index 107395c042ae07..2d8269f834bd60 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ flags, and the remaining form the internal block number.
>  ======== =============================================================
>  Bit      Description
>  ======== =============================================================
> -31 - 30	 Error and Zero flags - Used in the following way::
> +31 - 30	 Error and Zero flags - Used in the following way:
>  
>  	   == ==  ====================================================
>  	   31 30  Description
> 
> base-commit: 27600b51fbc8b9a4eba18c8d88d7edb146605f3f

-- 
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: btt: Unwrap bit 31-30 nested table

Posted by Alison Schofield 3 months ago

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 07:47:08PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Bit 31-30 usage table is already formatted as reST simple table, but it
> is wrapped in literal code block instead. Unwrap it.
> 

Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
> index 107395c042ae07..2d8269f834bd60 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/nvdimm/btt.rst
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ flags, and the remaining form the internal block number.
>  ======== =============================================================
>  Bit      Description
>  ======== =============================================================
> -31 - 30	 Error and Zero flags - Used in the following way::
> +31 - 30	 Error and Zero flags - Used in the following way:
>  
>  	   == ==  ====================================================
>  	   31 30  Description
> 
> base-commit: 27600b51fbc8b9a4eba18c8d88d7edb146605f3f
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
> 
>