From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To make sure that power rail is voted for, wire it up to its consumers.
Fixes: 9bd07f2c558f ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add in CAMCC for sc8280xp")
Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
index 5334adebf278..643a61cc91b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
@@ -4586,8 +4586,10 @@ camcc: clock-controller@ad00000 {
<&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
<&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
<&sleep_clk>;
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>;
- required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>,
+ <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
+ required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>,
+ <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
#power-domain-cells = <1>;
@@ -5788,8 +5790,12 @@ remoteproc_nsp0: remoteproc@1b300000 {
clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
clock-names = "xo";
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>;
- power-domain-names = "nsp";
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>,
+ <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>,
+ <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
+ power-domain-names = "nsp",
+ "cx",
+ "mxc";
memory-region = <&pil_nsp0_mem>;
@@ -5919,8 +5925,12 @@ remoteproc_nsp1: remoteproc@21300000 {
clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
clock-names = "xo";
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>;
- power-domain-names = "nsp";
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>,
+ <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>,
+ <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
+ power-domain-names = "nsp",
+ "cx",
+ "mxc";
memory-region = <&pil_nsp1_mem>;
--
2.51.2
On 11/5/2025 1:01 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> To make sure that power rail is voted for, wire it up to its consumers.
>
> Fixes: 9bd07f2c558f ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add in CAMCC for sc8280xp")
> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> index 5334adebf278..643a61cc91b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> @@ -4586,8 +4586,10 @@ camcc: clock-controller@ad00000 {
> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
> <&sleep_clk>;
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>;
> - required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
I see that none of the CAMCC PLLs/clocks are on MXC rail on SC8280XP target.
So, MXC support is not required for CAMCC.
Thanks,
Imran
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>,
> + <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> @@ -5788,8 +5790,12 @@ remoteproc_nsp0: remoteproc@1b300000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>;
> - power-domain-names = "nsp";
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
> + power-domain-names = "nsp",
> + "cx",
> + "mxc";
>
> memory-region = <&pil_nsp0_mem>;
>
> @@ -5919,8 +5925,12 @@ remoteproc_nsp1: remoteproc@21300000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>;
> - power-domain-names = "nsp";
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
> + power-domain-names = "nsp",
> + "cx",
> + "mxc";
>
> memory-region = <&pil_nsp1_mem>;
>
>
On 11/5/25 10:21 AM, Imran Shaik wrote:
>
>
> On 11/5/2025 1:01 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> To make sure that power rail is voted for, wire it up to its consumers.
>>
>> Fixes: 9bd07f2c558f ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add in CAMCC for sc8280xp")
>> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>> index 5334adebf278..643a61cc91b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>> @@ -4586,8 +4586,10 @@ camcc: clock-controller@ad00000 {
>> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
>> <&sleep_clk>;
>> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>;
>> - required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>,
>> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
>
> I see that none of the CAMCC PLLs/clocks are on MXC rail on SC8280XP target.
> So, MXC support is not required for CAMCC.
Hm, to the extent that camss is supported upstream, I could indeed
boot without pd_ignore_unused and the camera actually kept working..
I see in docs that there are links between MXC and various IPs within
camera so I'm a little confused. Would you know more?
I wasn't able to test venus because it locks up either way..
Konrad
On 11/5/2025 4:32 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11/5/25 10:21 AM, Imran Shaik wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/5/2025 1:01 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> To make sure that power rail is voted for, wire it up to its consumers.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 9bd07f2c558f ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add in CAMCC for sc8280xp")
>>> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> index 5334adebf278..643a61cc91b4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
>>> @@ -4586,8 +4586,10 @@ camcc: clock-controller@ad00000 {
>>> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>>> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
>>> <&sleep_clk>;
>>> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>;
>>> - required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>,
>>> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
>>
>> I see that none of the CAMCC PLLs/clocks are on MXC rail on SC8280XP target.
>> So, MXC support is not required for CAMCC.
>
> Hm, to the extent that camss is supported upstream, I could indeed
> boot without pd_ignore_unused and the camera actually kept working..
>
> I see in docs that there are links between MXC and various IPs within
> camera so I'm a little confused. Would you know more?
>
Not sure on the rail requirements from the camera core side, but from the
camera clock controller side, we don't need the MXC support.
Thanks,
Imran
>
> I wasn't able to test venus because it locks up either way..
>
> Konrad
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 08:31:10PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> To make sure that power rail is voted for, wire it up to its consumers.
>
> Fixes: 9bd07f2c558f ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add in CAMCC for sc8280xp")
> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.