The current cpuset code passes a local isolcpus_updated flag around in a
number of functions to determine if external isolation related cpumasks
like wq_unbound_cpumask should be updated. It is a bit cumbersome and
makes the code more complex. Simplify the code by using a global boolean
flag "isolated_cpus_updating" to track this. This flag will be set in
isolated_cpus_update() and cleared in update_isolation_cpumasks().
No functional change is expected.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d6d459c95d82..406a1c3789f5 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ static cpumask_var_t subpartitions_cpus;
*/
static cpumask_var_t isolated_cpus;
+/*
+ * isolated_cpus updating flag (protected by cpuset_mutex)
+ * Set if isolated_cpus is going to be updated in the current
+ * cpuset_mutex crtical section.
+ */
+static bool isolated_cpus_updating;
+
/*
* Housekeeping (HK_TYPE_DOMAIN) CPUs at boot
*/
@@ -1327,13 +1334,14 @@ static void isolated_cpus_update(int old_prs, int new_prs, struct cpumask *xcpus
cpumask_or(isolated_cpus, isolated_cpus, xcpus);
else
cpumask_andnot(isolated_cpus, isolated_cpus, xcpus);
+
+ isolated_cpus_updating = true;
}
/*
* isolated_cpus_should_update - Returns if the isolated_cpus mask needs update
* @prs: new or old partition_root_state
* @parent: parent cpuset
- * Return: true if isolated_cpus needs modification, false otherwise
*/
static bool isolated_cpus_should_update(int prs, struct cpuset *parent)
{
@@ -1347,15 +1355,12 @@ static bool isolated_cpus_should_update(int prs, struct cpuset *parent)
* @new_prs: new partition_root_state
* @parent: parent cpuset
* @xcpus: exclusive CPUs to be added
- * Return: true if isolated_cpus modified, false otherwise
*
* Remote partition if parent == NULL
*/
-static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
+static void partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
struct cpumask *xcpus)
{
- bool isolcpus_updated;
-
WARN_ON_ONCE(new_prs < 0);
lockdep_assert_held(&callback_lock);
if (!parent)
@@ -1365,13 +1370,11 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
if (parent == &top_cpuset)
cpumask_or(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
- isolcpus_updated = (new_prs != parent->partition_root_state);
- if (isolcpus_updated)
+ if (new_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
isolated_cpus_update(parent->partition_root_state, new_prs,
xcpus);
cpumask_andnot(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
- return isolcpus_updated;
}
/*
@@ -1379,15 +1382,12 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
* @old_prs: old partition_root_state
* @parent: parent cpuset
* @xcpus: exclusive CPUs to be removed
- * Return: true if isolated_cpus modified, false otherwise
*
* Remote partition if parent == NULL
*/
-static bool partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
+static void partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
struct cpumask *xcpus)
{
- bool isolcpus_updated;
-
WARN_ON_ONCE(old_prs < 0);
lockdep_assert_held(&callback_lock);
if (!parent)
@@ -1396,14 +1396,12 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
if (parent == &top_cpuset)
cpumask_andnot(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
- isolcpus_updated = (old_prs != parent->partition_root_state);
- if (isolcpus_updated)
+ if (old_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, parent->partition_root_state,
xcpus);
cpumask_and(xcpus, xcpus, cpu_active_mask);
cpumask_or(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
- return isolcpus_updated;
}
/*
@@ -1442,17 +1440,24 @@ static bool isolated_cpus_can_update(struct cpumask *add_cpus,
return res;
}
-static void update_isolation_cpumasks(bool isolcpus_updated)
+/*
+ * update_isolation_cpumasks - Update external isolation related CPU masks
+ *
+ * The following external CPU masks will be updated if necessary:
+ * - workqueue unbound cpumask
+ */
+static void update_isolation_cpumasks(void)
{
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
-
- if (!isolcpus_updated)
+ if (!isolated_cpus_updating)
return;
+ lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
ret = workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask(isolated_cpus);
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
+ isolated_cpus_updating = false;
}
/**
@@ -1577,8 +1582,6 @@ static inline bool is_local_partition(struct cpuset *cs)
static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
struct tmpmasks *tmp)
{
- bool isolcpus_updated;
-
/*
* The user must have sysadmin privilege.
*/
@@ -1605,11 +1608,11 @@ static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
return PERR_HKEEPING;
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
- isolcpus_updated = partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, NULL, tmp->new_cpus);
+ partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, NULL, tmp->new_cpus);
list_add(&cs->remote_sibling, &remote_children);
cpumask_copy(cs->effective_xcpus, tmp->new_cpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_isolation_cpumasks();
cpuset_force_rebuild();
cs->prs_err = 0;
@@ -1632,15 +1635,12 @@ static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
*/
static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
{
- bool isolcpus_updated;
-
WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_remote_partition(cs));
WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus));
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
list_del_init(&cs->remote_sibling);
- isolcpus_updated = partition_xcpus_del(cs->partition_root_state,
- NULL, cs->effective_xcpus);
+ partition_xcpus_del(cs->partition_root_state, NULL, cs->effective_xcpus);
if (cs->prs_err)
cs->partition_root_state = -cs->partition_root_state;
else
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
compute_excpus(cs, cs->effective_xcpus);
reset_partition_data(cs);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_isolation_cpumasks();
cpuset_force_rebuild();
/*
@@ -1675,7 +1675,6 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
{
bool adding, deleting;
int prs = cs->partition_root_state;
- int isolcpus_updated = 0;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_remote_partition(cs)))
return;
@@ -1711,9 +1710,9 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
if (adding)
- isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_add(prs, NULL, tmp->addmask);
+ partition_xcpus_add(prs, NULL, tmp->addmask);
if (deleting)
- isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_del(prs, NULL, tmp->delmask);
+ partition_xcpus_del(prs, NULL, tmp->delmask);
/*
* Need to update effective_xcpus and exclusive_cpus now as
* update_sibling_cpumasks() below may iterate back to the same cs.
@@ -1722,7 +1721,7 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
if (xcpus)
cpumask_copy(cs->exclusive_cpus, xcpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_isolation_cpumasks();
if (adding || deleting)
cpuset_force_rebuild();
@@ -1803,7 +1802,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
int deleting; /* Deleting cpus from parent's effective_cpus */
int old_prs, new_prs;
int part_error = PERR_NONE; /* Partition error? */
- int isolcpus_updated = 0;
struct cpumask *xcpus = user_xcpus(cs);
bool nocpu;
@@ -2065,14 +2063,12 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
* and vice versa.
*/
if (adding)
- isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_del(old_prs, parent,
- tmp->addmask);
+ partition_xcpus_del(old_prs, parent, tmp->addmask);
if (deleting)
- isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, parent,
- tmp->delmask);
+ partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, parent, tmp->delmask);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_isolation_cpumasks();
if ((old_prs != new_prs) && (cmd == partcmd_update))
update_partition_exclusive_flag(cs, new_prs);
@@ -3094,7 +3090,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
else if (isolcpus_updated)
isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_isolation_cpumasks();
/* Force update if switching back to member & update effective_xcpus */
update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmpmask, !new_prs);
--
2.51.1
On 2025/11/3 9:34, Waiman Long wrote:
> The current cpuset code passes a local isolcpus_updated flag around in a
> number of functions to determine if external isolation related cpumasks
> like wq_unbound_cpumask should be updated. It is a bit cumbersome and
> makes the code more complex. Simplify the code by using a global boolean
Agree.
> flag "isolated_cpus_updating" to track this. This flag will be set in
> isolated_cpus_update() and cleared in update_isolation_cpumasks().
>
> No functional change is expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index d6d459c95d82..406a1c3789f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ static cpumask_var_t subpartitions_cpus;
> */
> static cpumask_var_t isolated_cpus;
>
Is isolated_cpus protected by cpuset_mutex or callback_lock?
If isolated_cpus is indeed protected by cpuset_mutex, perhaps we can move the update of
isolated_cpus outside the critical section of callback_lock. This would allow us to call
update_isolation_cpumasks in isolated_cpus_update, making the isolated_cpus_updating variable
unnecessary. Reducing a global variable would be beneficial.
> +/*
> + * isolated_cpus updating flag (protected by cpuset_mutex)
> + * Set if isolated_cpus is going to be updated in the current
> + * cpuset_mutex crtical section.
> + */
> +static bool isolated_cpus_updating;
> +
> /*
> * Housekeeping (HK_TYPE_DOMAIN) CPUs at boot
> */
> @@ -1327,13 +1334,14 @@ static void isolated_cpus_update(int old_prs, int new_prs, struct cpumask *xcpus
> cpumask_or(isolated_cpus, isolated_cpus, xcpus);
> else
> cpumask_andnot(isolated_cpus, isolated_cpus, xcpus);
> +
> + isolated_cpus_updating = true;
> }
>
> /*
> * isolated_cpus_should_update - Returns if the isolated_cpus mask needs update
> * @prs: new or old partition_root_state
> * @parent: parent cpuset
> - * Return: true if isolated_cpus needs modification, false otherwise
> */
> static bool isolated_cpus_should_update(int prs, struct cpuset *parent)
> {
> @@ -1347,15 +1355,12 @@ static bool isolated_cpus_should_update(int prs, struct cpuset *parent)
> * @new_prs: new partition_root_state
> * @parent: parent cpuset
> * @xcpus: exclusive CPUs to be added
> - * Return: true if isolated_cpus modified, false otherwise
> *
> * Remote partition if parent == NULL
> */
> -static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
> +static void partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
> struct cpumask *xcpus)
> {
> - bool isolcpus_updated;
> -
> WARN_ON_ONCE(new_prs < 0);
> lockdep_assert_held(&callback_lock);
> if (!parent)
> @@ -1365,13 +1370,11 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
> if (parent == &top_cpuset)
> cpumask_or(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
>
> - isolcpus_updated = (new_prs != parent->partition_root_state);
> - if (isolcpus_updated)
> + if (new_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
Can this if statement be replaced with new helper isolated_cpus_should_update?
> isolated_cpus_update(parent->partition_root_state, new_prs,
> xcpus);
>
> cpumask_andnot(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
> - return isolcpus_updated;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1379,15 +1382,12 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
> * @old_prs: old partition_root_state
> * @parent: parent cpuset
> * @xcpus: exclusive CPUs to be removed
> - * Return: true if isolated_cpus modified, false otherwise
> *
> * Remote partition if parent == NULL
> */
> -static bool partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
> +static void partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
> struct cpumask *xcpus)
> {
> - bool isolcpus_updated;
> -
> WARN_ON_ONCE(old_prs < 0);
> lockdep_assert_held(&callback_lock);
> if (!parent)
> @@ -1396,14 +1396,12 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
> if (parent == &top_cpuset)
> cpumask_andnot(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
>
> - isolcpus_updated = (old_prs != parent->partition_root_state);
> - if (isolcpus_updated)
> + if (old_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
> isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, parent->partition_root_state,
> xcpus);
>
Ditto
> cpumask_and(xcpus, xcpus, cpu_active_mask);
> cpumask_or(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
> - return isolcpus_updated;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1442,17 +1440,24 @@ static bool isolated_cpus_can_update(struct cpumask *add_cpus,
> return res;
> }
>
> -static void update_isolation_cpumasks(bool isolcpus_updated)
> +/*
> + * update_isolation_cpumasks - Update external isolation related CPU masks
> + *
> + * The following external CPU masks will be updated if necessary:
> + * - workqueue unbound cpumask
> + */
> +static void update_isolation_cpumasks(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> -
> - if (!isolcpus_updated)
> + if (!isolated_cpus_updating)
> return;
>
> + lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> +
> ret = workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask(isolated_cpus);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
> + isolated_cpus_updating = false;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1577,8 +1582,6 @@ static inline bool is_local_partition(struct cpuset *cs)
> static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
> struct tmpmasks *tmp)
> {
> - bool isolcpus_updated;
> -
> /*
> * The user must have sysadmin privilege.
> */
> @@ -1605,11 +1608,11 @@ static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
> return PERR_HKEEPING;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - isolcpus_updated = partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, NULL, tmp->new_cpus);
> + partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, NULL, tmp->new_cpus);
> list_add(&cs->remote_sibling, &remote_children);
> cpumask_copy(cs->effective_xcpus, tmp->new_cpus);
> spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
> + update_isolation_cpumasks();
> cpuset_force_rebuild();
> cs->prs_err = 0;
>
> @@ -1632,15 +1635,12 @@ static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
> */
> static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
> {
> - bool isolcpus_updated;
> -
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_remote_partition(cs));
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus));
>
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> list_del_init(&cs->remote_sibling);
> - isolcpus_updated = partition_xcpus_del(cs->partition_root_state,
> - NULL, cs->effective_xcpus);
> + partition_xcpus_del(cs->partition_root_state, NULL, cs->effective_xcpus);
> if (cs->prs_err)
> cs->partition_root_state = -cs->partition_root_state;
> else
> @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
> compute_excpus(cs, cs->effective_xcpus);
> reset_partition_data(cs);
> spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
> + update_isolation_cpumasks();
> cpuset_force_rebuild();
>
> /*
> @@ -1675,7 +1675,6 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
> {
> bool adding, deleting;
> int prs = cs->partition_root_state;
> - int isolcpus_updated = 0;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_remote_partition(cs)))
> return;
> @@ -1711,9 +1710,9 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
>
> spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
> if (adding)
> - isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_add(prs, NULL, tmp->addmask);
> + partition_xcpus_add(prs, NULL, tmp->addmask);
> if (deleting)
> - isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_del(prs, NULL, tmp->delmask);
> + partition_xcpus_del(prs, NULL, tmp->delmask);
> /*
> * Need to update effective_xcpus and exclusive_cpus now as
> * update_sibling_cpumasks() below may iterate back to the same cs.
> @@ -1722,7 +1721,7 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
> if (xcpus)
> cpumask_copy(cs->exclusive_cpus, xcpus);
> spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
> + update_isolation_cpumasks();
> if (adding || deleting)
> cpuset_force_rebuild();
>
> @@ -1803,7 +1802,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> int deleting; /* Deleting cpus from parent's effective_cpus */
> int old_prs, new_prs;
> int part_error = PERR_NONE; /* Partition error? */
> - int isolcpus_updated = 0;
> struct cpumask *xcpus = user_xcpus(cs);
> bool nocpu;
>
> @@ -2065,14 +2063,12 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> * and vice versa.
> */
> if (adding)
> - isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_del(old_prs, parent,
> - tmp->addmask);
> + partition_xcpus_del(old_prs, parent, tmp->addmask);
> if (deleting)
> - isolcpus_updated += partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, parent,
> - tmp->delmask);
> + partition_xcpus_add(new_prs, parent, tmp->delmask);
>
> spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
> + update_isolation_cpumasks();
>
> if ((old_prs != new_prs) && (cmd == partcmd_update))
> update_partition_exclusive_flag(cs, new_prs);
> @@ -3094,7 +3090,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
> else if (isolcpus_updated)
> isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus);
> spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
> - update_isolation_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
> + update_isolation_cpumasks();
>
> /* Force update if switching back to member & update effective_xcpus */
> update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmpmask, !new_prs);
--
Best regards,
Ridong
On 11/3/25 1:46 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
>
> On 2025/11/3 9:34, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The current cpuset code passes a local isolcpus_updated flag around in a
>> number of functions to determine if external isolation related cpumasks
>> like wq_unbound_cpumask should be updated. It is a bit cumbersome and
>> makes the code more complex. Simplify the code by using a global boolean
> Agree.
>
>> flag "isolated_cpus_updating" to track this. This flag will be set in
>> isolated_cpus_update() and cleared in update_isolation_cpumasks().
>>
>> No functional change is expected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> index d6d459c95d82..406a1c3789f5 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ static cpumask_var_t subpartitions_cpus;
>> */
>> static cpumask_var_t isolated_cpus;
>>
> Is isolated_cpus protected by cpuset_mutex or callback_lock?
>
> If isolated_cpus is indeed protected by cpuset_mutex, perhaps we can move the update of
> isolated_cpus outside the critical section of callback_lock. This would allow us to call
> update_isolation_cpumasks in isolated_cpus_update, making the isolated_cpus_updating variable
> unnecessary. Reducing a global variable would be beneficial.
isolated_cpus is a user visible cpumask. So I would like to protect it
with both cpuset_mutex and callback_lock like the other user visible
cpumasks.
>
>> +/*
>> + * isolated_cpus updating flag (protected by cpuset_mutex)
>> + * Set if isolated_cpus is going to be updated in the current
>> + * cpuset_mutex crtical section.
>> + */
>> +static bool isolated_cpus_updating;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Housekeeping (HK_TYPE_DOMAIN) CPUs at boot
>> */
>> @@ -1327,13 +1334,14 @@ static void isolated_cpus_update(int old_prs, int new_prs, struct cpumask *xcpus
>> cpumask_or(isolated_cpus, isolated_cpus, xcpus);
>> else
>> cpumask_andnot(isolated_cpus, isolated_cpus, xcpus);
>> +
>> + isolated_cpus_updating = true;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> * isolated_cpus_should_update - Returns if the isolated_cpus mask needs update
>> * @prs: new or old partition_root_state
>> * @parent: parent cpuset
>> - * Return: true if isolated_cpus needs modification, false otherwise
>> */
>> static bool isolated_cpus_should_update(int prs, struct cpuset *parent)
>> {
>> @@ -1347,15 +1355,12 @@ static bool isolated_cpus_should_update(int prs, struct cpuset *parent)
>> * @new_prs: new partition_root_state
>> * @parent: parent cpuset
>> * @xcpus: exclusive CPUs to be added
>> - * Return: true if isolated_cpus modified, false otherwise
>> *
>> * Remote partition if parent == NULL
>> */
>> -static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
>> +static void partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
>> struct cpumask *xcpus)
>> {
>> - bool isolcpus_updated;
>> -
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(new_prs < 0);
>> lockdep_assert_held(&callback_lock);
>> if (!parent)
>> @@ -1365,13 +1370,11 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_add(int new_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
>> if (parent == &top_cpuset)
>> cpumask_or(subpartitions_cpus, subpartitions_cpus, xcpus);
>>
>> - isolcpus_updated = (new_prs != parent->partition_root_state);
>> - if (isolcpus_updated)
>> + if (new_prs != parent->partition_root_state)
> Can this if statement be replaced with new helper isolated_cpus_should_update?
The isolated_cpus_should_update() helper is for validating the change.
It is too late to call in partition_xcpus_add/del().
Cheers, Longman
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.