The correct term here should be "package"

Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@inspur.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index ab4651205e8a..6c684e54fe01 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Disregard _CPC if the number of entries in the return pachage is not
+	 * Disregard _CPC if the number of entries in the return package is not
 	 * as expected, but support future revisions being proper supersets of
 	 * the v3 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
 	 */
-- 
2.43.7

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 6:53 AM Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@inspur.com> wrote:
>
> The correct term here should be "package"
>
> Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@inspur.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index ab4651205e8a..6c684e54fe01 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>         }
>
>         /*
> -        * Disregard _CPC if the number of entries in the return pachage is not
> +        * Disregard _CPC if the number of entries in the return package is not
>          * as expected, but support future revisions being proper supersets of
>          * the v3 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
>          */
> --

Applied as 6.18-rc material with modified subject and changelog.

Thanks!