Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm
Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts
across various subsystems found on the SoC.
Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml
index e5c423130db6..7c4d6170491d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ properties:
compatible:
items:
- enum:
+ - qcom,glymur-ipcc
+ - qcom,kaanapali-ipcc
- qcom,milos-ipcc
- qcom,qcs8300-ipcc
- qcom,qdu1000-ipcc
--
2.25.1
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:41:44AM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote: > Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm > Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts > across various subsystems found on the SoC. > > Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) I guess no one is going to apply this, so I did. If your patches don't get applied, please chase the maintainers (Jassi) to apply them. Rob
On 16/01/2026 17:20, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:41:44AM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote: >> Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm >> Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts >> across various subsystems found on the SoC. >> >> Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > I guess no one is going to apply this, so I did. > > If your patches don't get applied, please chase the maintainers (Jassi) > to apply them. This or it is an effect of known problem with mailbox and interconnect subsystems - maintainers never send notifications of applied patches (neither publicly nor privately like Greg does), so you will never know if anything gets applied. This as well could be in the next silently (wasn't in 15th Jan, though). Best regards, Krzysztof
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:25 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 16/01/2026 17:20, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:41:44AM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote: > >> Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm > >> Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts > >> across various subsystems found on the SoC. > >> > >> Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++ > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > I guess no one is going to apply this, so I did. > > > > If your patches don't get applied, please chase the maintainers (Jassi) > > to apply them. > > > This or it is an effect of known problem with mailbox and interconnect > subsystems - maintainers never send notifications of applied patches > (neither publicly nor privately like Greg does), so you will never know > if anything gets applied. > > This as well could be in the next silently (wasn't in 15th Jan, though). Further investigation finds Jassi did apply this and 3 other patches. Stephen reported a conflict on 1/6 with another Qcom patch (conflicting with Bjorn's tree). No reply to Stephen, but *all* the mbox binding patches were dropped. Here's what was dropped: f8f632c18c32 dt-bindings: mbox: add pic64gx mailbox compatibility to mpfs mailbox 945dc11a38a0 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox controller bindings for Kaanapali 66b6e5daa915 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add IPCC support for Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms 9a92e22740e6 dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek,mt8196-vcp-mbox: add mtk vcp-mbox document Rob
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 11:13 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:25 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On 16/01/2026 17:20, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:41:44AM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote: > > >> Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm > > >> Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts > > >> across various subsystems found on the SoC. > > >> > > >> Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > > >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com> > > >> --- > > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++ > > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > I guess no one is going to apply this, so I did. > > > > > > If your patches don't get applied, please chase the maintainers (Jassi) > > > to apply them. > > > > > > This or it is an effect of known problem with mailbox and interconnect > > subsystems - maintainers never send notifications of applied patches > > (neither publicly nor privately like Greg does), so you will never know > > if anything gets applied. > > > > This as well could be in the next silently (wasn't in 15th Jan, though). > > Further investigation finds Jassi did apply this and 3 other patches. > Stephen reported a conflict on 1/6 with another Qcom patch > (conflicting with Bjorn's tree). No reply to Stephen, but *all* the > mbox binding patches were dropped. > > Here's what was dropped: > > f8f632c18c32 dt-bindings: mbox: add pic64gx mailbox compatibility to > mpfs mailbox > 945dc11a38a0 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox controller > bindings for Kaanapali > 66b6e5daa915 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add IPCC support for > Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms > 9a92e22740e6 dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek,mt8196-vcp-mbox: add mtk > vcp-mbox document > Yes, I had to reconstruct the mailbox for-next branch because some patch had an issue and the pr was not merged after a very late fix. Sorry I didn't realize people not receiving pick-confirmations was so problematic. I will make sure I reply to every patch that I pick. Thanks.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 12:37 PM Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 11:13 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:25 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 16/01/2026 17:20, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:41:44AM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote: > > > >> Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm > > > >> Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts > > > >> across various subsystems found on the SoC. > > > >> > > > >> Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com> > > > >> --- > > > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++ > > > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > I guess no one is going to apply this, so I did. > > > > > > > > If your patches don't get applied, please chase the maintainers (Jassi) > > > > to apply them. > > > > > > > > > This or it is an effect of known problem with mailbox and interconnect > > > subsystems - maintainers never send notifications of applied patches > > > (neither publicly nor privately like Greg does), so you will never know > > > if anything gets applied. > > > > > > This as well could be in the next silently (wasn't in 15th Jan, though). > > > > Further investigation finds Jassi did apply this and 3 other patches. > > Stephen reported a conflict on 1/6 with another Qcom patch > > (conflicting with Bjorn's tree). No reply to Stephen, but *all* the > > mbox binding patches were dropped. > > > > Here's what was dropped: > > > > f8f632c18c32 dt-bindings: mbox: add pic64gx mailbox compatibility to > > mpfs mailbox > > 945dc11a38a0 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox controller > > bindings for Kaanapali > > 66b6e5daa915 dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add IPCC support for > > Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms > > 9a92e22740e6 dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek,mt8196-vcp-mbox: add mtk > > vcp-mbox document > > > Yes, I had to reconstruct the mailbox for-next branch because some > patch had an issue and the pr was not merged after a very late fix. > Sorry I didn't realize people not receiving pick-confirmations was so > problematic. I will make sure I reply to every patch that I pick. TBC, the issue is not so much sending applied emails or not. It's the not applying patches for 6 weeks (best I can tell, this patch was never in next until after 12/10), and then dropping them silently. Rob
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:41:44AM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote: > Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm > Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts > across various subsystems found on the SoC. > > Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Regards, Bjorn > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml > index e5c423130db6..7c4d6170491d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ properties: > compatible: > items: > - enum: > + - qcom,glymur-ipcc > + - qcom,kaanapali-ipcc > - qcom,milos-ipcc > - qcom,qcs8300-ipcc > - qcom,qdu1000-ipcc > > -- > 2.25.1 > >
On 31/10/2025 08:41, Jingyi Wang wrote: > Document the Inter-Processor Communication Controller on the Qualcomm > Kaanapali and Glymur Platforms, which will be used to route interrupts > across various subsystems found on the SoC. > > Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.