arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
@@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
serial1 = &uart14;
};
+ backlight: backlight {
+ compatible = "pwm-backlight";
+ pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
+ enable-gpios = <&pmc8380_3_gpios 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ power-supply = <&vreg_edp_bl>;
+
+ pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_en>, <&edp_bl_pwm>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ };
+
wcd938x: audio-codec {
compatible = "qcom,wcd9385-codec";
@@ -183,6 +193,22 @@ vreg_edp_3p3: regulator-edp-3p3 {
regulator-boot-on;
};
+ vreg_edp_bl: regulator-edp-bl {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+
+ regulator-name = "VBL9";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <3600000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <3600000>;
+
+ gpio = <&pmc8380_3_gpios 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ enable-active-high;
+
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_reg_en>;
+
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ };
+
vreg_nvme: regulator-nvme {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
@@ -819,6 +845,8 @@ &mdss_dp3 {
aux-bus {
panel {
compatible = "edp-panel";
+
+ backlight = <&backlight>;
power-supply = <&vreg_edp_3p3>;
port {
@@ -879,6 +907,22 @@ usb0_1p8_reg_en: usb0-1p8-reg-en-state {
};
};
+&pmc8380_3_gpios {
+ edp_bl_en: edp-bl-en-state {
+ pins = "gpio4";
+ function = "normal";
+ power-source = <1>;
+ input-disable;
+ output-enable;
+ };
+
+ edp_bl_reg_en: edp-bl-reg-en-state {
+ pins = "gpio10";
+ function = "normal";
+ };
+
+};
+
&pmc8380_5_gpios {
usb0_pwr_1p15_reg_en: usb0-pwr-1p15-reg-en-state {
pins = "gpio8";
@@ -890,6 +934,17 @@ usb0_pwr_1p15_reg_en: usb0-pwr-1p15-reg-en-state {
};
};
+&pmk8550_gpios {
+ edp_bl_pwm: edp-bl-pwm-state {
+ pins = "gpio5";
+ function = "func3";
+ };
+};
+
+&pmk8550_pwm {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
&smb2360_0 {
status = "okay";
};
---
base-commit: f7d2388eeec24966fc4d5cf32d706f0514f29ac5
change-id: 20251028-hamoa_dvt_backlight-373528b7ce7e
Best regards,
--
Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 10/28/25 8:04 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
> Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
> control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
>
> Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
> by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
The subject must say "hamoa-iot-evk:"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
> index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
> serial1 = &uart14;
> };
>
> + backlight: backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
Try adjusting the backlight value.. you'll find some funny behavior
near the max level.. which reminds me I should send some fixes for
some laptop DTs
[...]
> + vreg_edp_bl: regulator-edp-bl {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +
> + regulator-name = "VBL9";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3600000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3600000>;
> +
> + gpio = <&pmc8380_3_gpios 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + enable-active-high;
> +
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_reg_en>;
property-n
property-names
in this order, please
Konrad
On 10/28/2025 5:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 10/28/25 8:04 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>> Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
>> control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
>>
>> Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
>> by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>
> The subject must say "hamoa-iot-evk:"
Thanks and got it , will fix it in next version.>>
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>> index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
>> serial1 = &uart14;
>> };
>>
>> + backlight: backlight {
>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>> + pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
>
> Try adjusting the backlight value.. you'll find some funny behavior
> near the max level.. which reminds me I should send some fixes for
> some laptop DTs
>
I tried sliding the backlight between the maximum and minimum values.
It seems that at a certain sliding speed, when approaching the maximum
value, there is some brightness flickering. Is this the phenomenon
you’re referring to?> [...]
>
>> + vreg_edp_bl: regulator-edp-bl {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> +
>> + regulator-name = "VBL9";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3600000>;
>> +
>> + gpio = <&pmc8380_3_gpios 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + enable-active-high;
>> +
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_reg_en>;
>
> property-n
> property-names
>
> in this order, please
>
> KonradThanks and got it ,will fix it in next version.
On 10/30/25 10:08 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/2025 5:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/28/25 8:04 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>> Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
>>> control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
>>>
>>> Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
>>> by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> The subject must say "hamoa-iot-evk:"
> Thanks and got it , will fix it in next version.>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>> index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
>>> serial1 = &uart14;
>>> };
>>> + backlight: backlight {
>>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>>> + pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
>>
>> Try adjusting the backlight value.. you'll find some funny behavior
>> near the max level.. which reminds me I should send some fixes for
>> some laptop DTs
>>
> I tried sliding the backlight between the maximum and minimum values. It seems that at a certain sliding speed, when approaching the maximum value, there is some brightness flickering. Is this the phenomenon you’re referring to?> [...]
"maybe" - for me it was the brightness actually going down beyond ~80%
The issue is that the PWM hardware can't really do a period that's
== 5000000 ns
But it seems like this is no longer an issue since the driver now
rounds up to the closest supported value, see last couple commits
to drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
Konrad
On 10/30/2025 5:41 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 10/30/25 10:08 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/2025 5:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 10/28/25 8:04 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>> Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
>>>> control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
>>>>
>>>> Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
>>>> by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> The subject must say "hamoa-iot-evk:"
>> Thanks and got it , will fix it in next version.>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>> index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
>>>> serial1 = &uart14;
>>>> };
>>>> + backlight: backlight {
>>>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>>>> + pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
>>>
>>> Try adjusting the backlight value.. you'll find some funny behavior
>>> near the max level.. which reminds me I should send some fixes for
>>> some laptop DTs
>>>
>> I tried sliding the backlight between the maximum and minimum values. It seems that at a certain sliding speed, when approaching the maximum value, there is some brightness flickering. Is this the phenomenon you’re referring to?> [...]
>
> "maybe" - for me it was the brightness actually going down beyond ~80%
>
> The issue is that the PWM hardware can't really do a period that's
> == 5000000 ns
>
> But it seems like this is no longer an issue since the driver now
> rounds up to the closest supported value, see last couple commits
> to drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
>
> Konrad
Oh,thanks for sharing that. I saw the phenomenon you mentioned.
Previously, my baseline had already merged this patch series:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250305-leds-qcom-lpg-fix-max-pwm-on-hi-res-v4-0-bfe124a53a9f@linaro.org/,
so I didn’t observe the ‘brightness actually going down beyond ~80%.’and
just very slight flickering. After I reverted patches, it indeed
appeared. So here i want to confirm,
pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>
can i keep the value 5000000 ?
On 10/30/25 12:07 PM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>
>
> On 10/30/2025 5:41 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/30/25 10:08 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/28/2025 5:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 10/28/25 8:04 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>> Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
>>>>> control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
>>>>> by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> The subject must say "hamoa-iot-evk:"
>>> Thanks and got it , will fix it in next version.>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>> index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
>>>>> serial1 = &uart14;
>>>>> };
>>>>> + backlight: backlight {
>>>>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>>>>> + pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
>>>>
>>>> Try adjusting the backlight value.. you'll find some funny behavior
>>>> near the max level.. which reminds me I should send some fixes for
>>>> some laptop DTs
>>>>
>>> I tried sliding the backlight between the maximum and minimum values. It seems that at a certain sliding speed, when approaching the maximum value, there is some brightness flickering. Is this the phenomenon you’re referring to?> [...]
>>
>> "maybe" - for me it was the brightness actually going down beyond ~80%
>>
>> The issue is that the PWM hardware can't really do a period that's
>> == 5000000 ns
>>
>> But it seems like this is no longer an issue since the driver now
>> rounds up to the closest supported value, see last couple commits
>> to drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
>>
>> Konrad
> Oh,thanks for sharing that. I saw the phenomenon you mentioned. Previously, my baseline had already merged this patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250305-leds-qcom-lpg-fix-max-pwm-on-hi-res-v4-0-bfe124a53a9f@linaro.org/, so I didn’t observe the ‘brightness actually going down beyond ~80%.’and just very slight flickering. After I reverted patches, it indeed appeared. So here i want to confirm,
> pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>
> can i keep the value 5000000 ?
I think so.. perhaps make sure the period is appropriate for
the backlight device at the other end since you mentioned it's
flickering
Konrad
On 10/30/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 10/30/25 12:07 PM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/30/2025 5:41 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 10/30/25 10:08 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/28/2025 5:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> On 10/28/25 8:04 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>>> Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
>>>>>> control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
>>>>>> by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> The subject must say "hamoa-iot-evk:"
>>>> Thanks and got it , will fix it in next version.>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>>> index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
>>>>>> serial1 = &uart14;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> + backlight: backlight {
>>>>>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>>>>>> + pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
>>>>>
>>>>> Try adjusting the backlight value.. you'll find some funny behavior
>>>>> near the max level.. which reminds me I should send some fixes for
>>>>> some laptop DTs
>>>>>
>>>> I tried sliding the backlight between the maximum and minimum values. It seems that at a certain sliding speed, when approaching the maximum value, there is some brightness flickering. Is this the phenomenon you’re referring to?> [...]
>>>
>>> "maybe" - for me it was the brightness actually going down beyond ~80%
>>>
>>> The issue is that the PWM hardware can't really do a period that's
>>> == 5000000 ns
>>>
>>> But it seems like this is no longer an issue since the driver now
>>> rounds up to the closest supported value, see last couple commits
>>> to drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
>>>
>>> Konrad
>> Oh,thanks for sharing that. I saw the phenomenon you mentioned. Previously, my baseline had already merged this patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250305-leds-qcom-lpg-fix-max-pwm-on-hi-res-v4-0-bfe124a53a9f@linaro.org/, so I didn’t observe the ‘brightness actually going down beyond ~80%.’and just very slight flickering. After I reverted patches, it indeed appeared. So here i want to confirm,
>> pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>
>> can i keep the value 5000000 ?
>
> I think so.. perhaps make sure the period is appropriate for
> the backlight device at the other end since you mentioned it's
> flickering
>
> Konrad
Compared to ‘brightness actually going down beyond ~80%’, this is just a
very slight flicker that only occurs when sliding the brightness bar at
a specific speed.It won’t occur in most cases. Also tried another value
pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 4266537>, and it looks the same, so can we keep
it at 5000000 here?
On 11/5/25 10:58 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>
>
> On 10/30/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/30/25 12:07 PM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/30/2025 5:41 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 10/30/25 10:08 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/28/2025 5:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/28/25 8:04 AM, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>>>> Previously, the eDP panel backlight was enabled via UEFI. Added backlight
>>>>>>> control node in kernel DTS due to some meta may not enable the backlight.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aligned with other x1e80100-based platforms: the PWM signal is controlled
>>>>>>> by PMK8550, and the backlight enable signal is handled by PMC8380.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The subject must say "hamoa-iot-evk:"
>>>>> Thanks and got it , will fix it in next version.>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>>>> index 36dd6599402b4650b7f8ad2c0cd22212116a25fe..fda1b3a3c7673be74832c27849231cba4bc1f25f 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa-iot-evk.dts
>>>>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ aliases {
>>>>>>> serial1 = &uart14;
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> + backlight: backlight {
>>>>>>> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
>>>>>>> + pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try adjusting the backlight value.. you'll find some funny behavior
>>>>>> near the max level.. which reminds me I should send some fixes for
>>>>>> some laptop DTs
>>>>>>
>>>>> I tried sliding the backlight between the maximum and minimum values. It seems that at a certain sliding speed, when approaching the maximum value, there is some brightness flickering. Is this the phenomenon you’re referring to?> [...]
>>>>
>>>> "maybe" - for me it was the brightness actually going down beyond ~80%
>>>>
>>>> The issue is that the PWM hardware can't really do a period that's
>>>> == 5000000 ns
>>>>
>>>> But it seems like this is no longer an issue since the driver now
>>>> rounds up to the closest supported value, see last couple commits
>>>> to drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
>>>>
>>>> Konrad
>>> Oh,thanks for sharing that. I saw the phenomenon you mentioned. Previously, my baseline had already merged this patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250305-leds-qcom-lpg-fix-max-pwm-on-hi-res-v4-0-bfe124a53a9f@linaro.org/, so I didn’t observe the ‘brightness actually going down beyond ~80%.’and just very slight flickering. After I reverted patches, it indeed appeared. So here i want to confirm,
>>> pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 5000000>
>>> can i keep the value 5000000 ?
>>
>> I think so.. perhaps make sure the period is appropriate for
>> the backlight device at the other end since you mentioned it's
>> flickering
>>
>> Konrad
> Compared to ‘brightness actually going down beyond ~80%’, this is just a very slight flicker that only occurs when sliding the brightness bar at a specific speed.It won’t occur in most cases. Also tried another value pwms = <&pmk8550_pwm 0 4266537>, and it looks the same, so can we keep it at 5000000 here?
As I said, just put whatever the backlight that the PWM controller
outputs to expects.
Konrad
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.