Document the compatible string for the SDHCI controller on the
sm8750 platform.

Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <sarthak.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
index 594bd174ff21..027011223368 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ properties:
               - qcom,sm8450-sdhci
               - qcom,sm8550-sdhci
               - qcom,sm8650-sdhci
+              - qcom,sm8750-sdhci
               - qcom,x1e80100-sdhci
           - const: qcom,sdhci-msm-v5 # for sdcc version 5.0
 
-- 
2.34.1

On 26/10/2025 12:17, Sarthak Garg wrote:
> Document the compatible string for the SDHCI controller on the
> sm8750 platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <sarthak.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---



Why are you sending third time the same, even though this was applied
long time ago at v1? Please do not send unnecessary patches, this just
clutters people's mailboxes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 10/27/2025 8:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/10/2025 12:17, Sarthak Garg wrote:
>> Document the compatible string for the SDHCI controller on the
>> sm8750 platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <sarthak.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
>> ---
>
>
> Why are you sending third time the same, even though this was applied
> long time ago at v1? Please do not send unnecessary patches, this just
> clutters people's mailboxes.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


I had assumed that we need to repost the entire patch series regardless 
of whether some patches were already ACKed or applied. I’ll make sure to 
avoid resending already accepted patches in future submissions to keep 
the mailbox clean.


Regards,

Sarthak

On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 12:17:51PM +0530, Sarthak Garg wrote:
> 
> On 10/27/2025 8:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 26/10/2025 12:17, Sarthak Garg wrote:
> > > Document the compatible string for the SDHCI controller on the
> > > sm8750 platform.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <sarthak.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > 
> > 
> > Why are you sending third time the same, even though this was applied
> > long time ago at v1? Please do not send unnecessary patches, this just
> > clutters people's mailboxes.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> 
> 
> I had assumed that we need to repost the entire patch series regardless of
> whether some patches were already ACKed or applied. I’ll make sure to avoid
> resending already accepted patches in future submissions to keep the mailbox
> clean.
> 

In the end maintainers are going to merge your patches onto the tip of
their branch(es).

So, if you didn't rebase your changes past the merge of this binding,
did you validate that the other changes in the series still applies? Do
they still compile? Do they still work as intended?

Regards,
Bjorn

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sarthak
> 
> 

On 10/11/2025 07:47, Sarthak Garg wrote:
> 
> On 10/27/2025 8:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/10/2025 12:17, Sarthak Garg wrote:
>>> Document the compatible string for the SDHCI controller on the
>>> sm8750 platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <sarthak.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>
>>
>> Why are you sending third time the same, even though this was applied
>> long time ago at v1? Please do not send unnecessary patches, this just
>> clutters people's mailboxes.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> I had assumed that we need to repost the entire patch series regardless 
> of whether some patches were already ACKed or applied. I’ll make sure to 

Why? What sort of documentation ever suggested sending things which are
applied? What sort of logic drives it?

Best regards,
Krzysztof