testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Newer kernels (since ~v6.18-rc1) return ENOTTY instead of EINVAL when
invoking ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid). Update the
test to accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors to ensure
compatibility across different kernel versions.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
index d20c6f074..744f7def4 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
*/
/*\
- * Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL error when PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This
- * happens when:
+ * Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL or ENOTTY (since ~v6.18-rc1) error when
+ * PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This happens when:
*
* - info parameter is NULL
* - info parameter is providing the wrong size
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include "tst_test.h"
#include "lapi/pidfd.h"
#include "lapi/sched.h"
+#include <errno.h>
#include "ioctl_pidfd.h"
struct pidfd_info_invalid {
@@ -43,7 +44,12 @@ static void run(void)
exit(0);
TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO, NULL), EINVAL);
- TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid), EINVAL);
+
+ /* Expect ioctl to fail; accept either EINVAL or ENOTTY (~v6.18-rc1) */
+ int exp_errnos[] = {EINVAL, ENOTTY};
+
+ TST_EXP_FAIL_ARR(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid),
+ exp_errnos, ARRAY_SIZE(exp_errnos));
SAFE_CLOSE(pidfd);
}
--
2.43.0
Hi,
On Thursday, October 23, 2025 6:44:01 PM CEST Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Newer kernels (since ~v6.18-rc1) return ENOTTY instead of EINVAL when
> invoking ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid). Update the
> test to accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors to ensure
> compatibility across different kernel versions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Regards,
Avinesh
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
> index d20c6f074..744f7def4 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
> */
>
> /*\
> - * Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL error when PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This
> - * happens when:
> + * Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL or ENOTTY (since ~v6.18-rc1) error when
> + * PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This happens when:
> *
> * - info parameter is NULL
> * - info parameter is providing the wrong size
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include "tst_test.h"
> #include "lapi/pidfd.h"
> #include "lapi/sched.h"
> +#include <errno.h>
> #include "ioctl_pidfd.h"
>
> struct pidfd_info_invalid {
> @@ -43,7 +44,12 @@ static void run(void)
> exit(0);
>
> TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO, NULL), EINVAL);
> - TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid), EINVAL);
> +
> + /* Expect ioctl to fail; accept either EINVAL or ENOTTY (~v6.18-rc1) */
> + int exp_errnos[] = {EINVAL, ENOTTY};
> +
> + TST_EXP_FAIL_ARR(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid),
> + exp_errnos, ARRAY_SIZE(exp_errnos));
>
> SAFE_CLOSE(pidfd);
> }
>
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 18:44, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Newer kernels (since ~v6.18-rc1) return ENOTTY instead of EINVAL when
> invoking ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid). Update the
> test to accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors to ensure
> compatibility across different kernel versions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Verified this on arm64, and the test passed now.
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cheers,
Anders
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
> index d20c6f074..744f7def4 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c
> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
> */
>
> /*\
> - * Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL error when PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This
> - * happens when:
> + * Verify that ioctl() raises an EINVAL or ENOTTY (since ~v6.18-rc1) error when
> + * PIDFD_GET_INFO is used. This happens when:
> *
> * - info parameter is NULL
> * - info parameter is providing the wrong size
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include "tst_test.h"
> #include "lapi/pidfd.h"
> #include "lapi/sched.h"
> +#include <errno.h>
> #include "ioctl_pidfd.h"
>
> struct pidfd_info_invalid {
> @@ -43,7 +44,12 @@ static void run(void)
> exit(0);
>
> TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO, NULL), EINVAL);
> - TST_EXP_FAIL(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid), EINVAL);
> +
> + /* Expect ioctl to fail; accept either EINVAL or ENOTTY (~v6.18-rc1) */
> + int exp_errnos[] = {EINVAL, ENOTTY};
> +
> + TST_EXP_FAIL_ARR(ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid),
> + exp_errnos, ARRAY_SIZE(exp_errnos));
>
> SAFE_CLOSE(pidfd);
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Hi all,
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 18:44, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Newer kernels (since ~v6.18-rc1) return ENOTTY instead of EINVAL when
> > invoking ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid). Update the
> > test to accept both EINVAL and ENOTTY as valid errors to ensure
> > compatibility across different kernel versions.
I dared to add a commit which caused the change (found by Cyril Hrubis):
3c17001b21b9f ("pidfs: validate extensible ioctls")
and merged!
Thanks for fix and review!
Kind regards,
Petr
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.