mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/
Changes in V2:
- Added a new test combination per Huang
Changes in V1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644
--- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
+++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
@@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx)
WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma))));
WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte))));
WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte))));
+
+ WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte))));
+ WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte))));
+ WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte))));
+ WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_wrprotect(pte))));
+ WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte))));
}
static void __init pte_advanced_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
@@ -195,6 +201,12 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx)
WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite(pmd, args->vma))));
WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkclean(pmd))));
WARN_ON(!pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkdirty(pmd))));
+
+ WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_mkclean(pmd))));
+ WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkdirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd))));
+ WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_wrprotect(pmd))));
+ WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd))));
+
/*
* A huge page does not point to next level page table
* entry. Hence this must qualify as pmd_bad().
--
2.30.2
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes:
> Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/
>
> Changes in V2:
>
> - Added a new test combination per Huang
>
> Changes in V1:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>
> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx)
> WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma))));
> WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte))));
> WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte))));
> +
> + WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte))));
> + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte))));
> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte))));
> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_wrprotect(pte))));
> + WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte))));
> }
>
> static void __init pte_advanced_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)
> @@ -195,6 +201,12 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx)
> WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite(pmd, args->vma))));
> WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkclean(pmd))));
> WARN_ON(!pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkdirty(pmd))));
> +
> + WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_mkclean(pmd))));
> + WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkdirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd))));
> + WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_wrprotect(pmd))));
> + WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd))));
Why not add
WARN_ON(!pmd_dirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_mkdirty(pte))));
too?
---
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> +
> /*
> * A huge page does not point to next level page table
> * entry. Hence this must qualify as pmd_bad().
On 23/10/25 6:47 AM, Huang, Ying wrote: > Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: > >> Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests. >> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> >> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> >> --- >> These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/ >> >> Changes in V2: >> >> - Added a new test combination per Huang >> >> Changes in V1: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ >> >> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >> index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644 >> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >> @@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) >> WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); >> WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >> WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >> + >> + WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >> + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); >> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_wrprotect(pte)))); >> + WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); >> } >> >> static void __init pte_advanced_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args) >> @@ -195,6 +201,12 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) >> WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite(pmd, args->vma)))); >> WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkclean(pmd)))); >> WARN_ON(!pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkdirty(pmd)))); >> + >> + WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_mkclean(pmd)))); >> + WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkdirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd)))); >> + WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_wrprotect(pmd)))); >> + WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd)))); > > Why not add > > WARN_ON(!pmd_dirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_mkdirty(pte)))); > > too? Sure will add the above test which will also be symmetrical with a similar PTE test being proposed here.
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: > Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests. > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> > --- > These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/ > > Changes in V2: > > - Added a new test combination per Huang > > Changes in V1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ > > mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c > index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644 > --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c > +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c > @@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) > WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); > WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); > WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); > + > + WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); > + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); > + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); Why do you use pte_mkwrite_novma(pte) instead of pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma) ? > + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_wrprotect(pte)))); > + WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); > } > > static void __init pte_advanced_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args) > @@ -195,6 +201,12 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) > WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite(pmd, args->vma)))); > WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkclean(pmd)))); > WARN_ON(!pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkdirty(pmd)))); > + > + WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_mkclean(pmd)))); > + WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkdirty(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd)))); > + WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_wrprotect(pmd)))); > + WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd)))); > + > /* > * A huge page does not point to next level page table > * entry. Hence this must qualify as pmd_bad(). --- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
On 22/10/25 1:03 PM, Huang, Ying wrote: > Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: > >> Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests. >> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> >> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> >> --- >> These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/ >> >> Changes in V2: >> >> - Added a new test combination per Huang >> >> Changes in V1: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ >> >> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >> index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644 >> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >> @@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) >> WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); >> WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >> WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >> + >> + WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >> + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); > > Why do you use > > pte_mkwrite_novma(pte) > > instead of > > pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma) Just wanted to have more coverage for pte_mkwrite_novma() helper which was missing till now in this test. But just wondering is there a specific reason for replacing this with pte_mkwrite() helper instead here ? Also we could probably add tests for both these helper variations if that is preferred.
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: > On 22/10/25 1:03 PM, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: >> >>> Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests. >>> >>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >>> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> >>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org >>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> >>> --- >>> These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch. >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/ >>> >>> Changes in V2: >>> >>> - Added a new test combination per Huang >>> >>> Changes in V1: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ >>> >>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>> index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644 >>> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>> @@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) >>> WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); >>> WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >>> WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >>> + >>> + WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >>> + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >>> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); >> >> Why do you use >> >> pte_mkwrite_novma(pte) >> >> instead of >> >> pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma) > Just wanted to have more coverage for pte_mkwrite_novma() helper which was missing > till now in this test. But just wondering is there a specific reason for replacing > this with pte_mkwrite() helper instead here ? Also we could probably add tests for > both these helper variations if that is preferred. IIUC, pte_mkwrite() is a more formal interface. pte_mkwrite_novma() is used to implement pte_mkwrite(). So, IMHO, we should use the more formal pte_mkwrite() interface if possible. --- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
On 22.10.25 10:11, Huang, Ying wrote: > Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: > >> On 22/10/25 1:03 PM, Huang, Ying wrote: >>> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: >>> >>>> Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests. >>>> >>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >>>> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> >>>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org >>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> >>>> --- >>>> These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch. >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/ >>>> >>>> Changes in V2: >>>> >>>> - Added a new test combination per Huang >>>> >>>> Changes in V1: >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ >>>> >>>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>>> index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644 >>>> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>>> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>>> @@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) >>>> WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); >>>> WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >>>> WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >>>> + >>>> + WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >>>> + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >>>> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); >>> >>> Why do you use >>> >>> pte_mkwrite_novma(pte) >>> >>> instead of >>> >>> pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma) >> Just wanted to have more coverage for pte_mkwrite_novma() helper which was missing >> till now in this test. But just wondering is there a specific reason for replacing >> this with pte_mkwrite() helper instead here ? Also we could probably add tests for >> both these helper variations if that is preferred. > > IIUC, pte_mkwrite() is a more formal interface. pte_mkwrite_novma() is > used to implement pte_mkwrite(). So, IMHO, we should use the more > formal pte_mkwrite() interface if possible. pte_mkwrite() does different things based on VMA flags on some archs (e.g., x86). So to test the "interesting" stuff one would have to craft a special VMA. Without any special flags pte_mkwrite() really is just pte_mkwrite_novma(). -- Cheers David / dhildenb
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> writes: > On 22.10.25 10:11, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: >> >>> On 22/10/25 1:03 PM, Huang, Ying wrote: >>>> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> Add some [pte|pmd]_mkwrite_novma() relevant tests. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >>>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >>>>> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> >>>>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org >>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> These tests clear on arm64 platform after the following recent patch. >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015023712.46598-1-ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com/ >>>>> >>>>> Changes in V2: >>>>> >>>>> - Added a new test combination per Huang >>>>> >>>>> Changes in V1: >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251021024424.2390325-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ >>>>> >>>>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>>>> index 830107b6dd08..def344bb4a32 100644 >>>>> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>>>> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c >>>>> @@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) >>>>> WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); >>>>> WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >>>>> WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >>>>> + >>>>> + WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); >>>>> + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); >>>>> + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); >>>> >>>> Why do you use >>>> >>>> pte_mkwrite_novma(pte) >>>> >>>> instead of >>>> >>>> pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma) >>> Just wanted to have more coverage for pte_mkwrite_novma() helper which was missing >>> till now in this test. But just wondering is there a specific reason for replacing >>> this with pte_mkwrite() helper instead here ? Also we could probably add tests for >>> both these helper variations if that is preferred. >> IIUC, pte_mkwrite() is a more formal interface. pte_mkwrite_novma() >> is >> used to implement pte_mkwrite(). So, IMHO, we should use the more >> formal pte_mkwrite() interface if possible. > > pte_mkwrite() does different things based on VMA flags on some archs > (e.g., x86). So to test the "interesting" stuff one would have to > craft a special VMA. > > Without any special flags pte_mkwrite() really is just pte_mkwrite_novma(). Thanks for explanation. If so, I'm fine to use pte_mkwrite_novma() in the tests. --- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.