Commit c1e18c17bda6 ("s390/pci: add zpci_set_irq()/zpci_clear_irq()"),
introduced the zpci_set_irq() and zpci_clear_irq(), to be used while
resetting a zPCI device.

Commit da995d538d3a ("s390/pci: implement reset_slot for hotplug slot"),
mentions zpci_clear_irq() being called in the path for zpci_hot_reset_device().
But that is not the case anymore and these functions are not called
outside of this file. Instead zpci_hot_reset_device() relies on
zpci_disable_device() also clearing the IRQs, but misses to reset the
zdev->irqs_registered flag.

However after a CLP disable/enable reset, the device's IRQ are
unregistered, but the flag zdev->irq_registered does not get cleared. It
creates an inconsistent state and so arch_restore_msi_irqs() doesn't
correctly restore the device's IRQ. This becomes a problem when a PCI
driver tries to restore the state of the device through
pci_restore_state(). Restore IRQ unconditionally for the device and remove
the irq_registered flag as its redundant.

Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 1 -
 arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c     | 9 +--------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
index 6890925d5587..a32f465ecf73 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ struct zpci_dev {
 	u8		has_resources	: 1;
 	u8		is_physfn	: 1;
 	u8		util_str_avail	: 1;
-	u8		irqs_registered	: 1;
 	u8		tid_avail	: 1;
 	u8		rtr_avail	: 1; /* Relaxed translation allowed */
 	unsigned int	devfn;		/* DEVFN part of the RID*/
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
index 84482a921332..e73be96ce5fe 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
@@ -107,9 +107,6 @@ static int zpci_set_irq(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
 	else
 		rc = zpci_set_airq(zdev);
 
-	if (!rc)
-		zdev->irqs_registered = 1;
-
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -123,9 +120,6 @@ static int zpci_clear_irq(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
 	else
 		rc = zpci_clear_airq(zdev);
 
-	if (!rc)
-		zdev->irqs_registered = 0;
-
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -427,8 +421,7 @@ bool arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
 
-	if (!zdev->irqs_registered)
-		zpci_set_irq(zdev);
+	zpci_set_irq(zdev);
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0

On 10/20/25 3:02 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
> Commit c1e18c17bda6 ("s390/pci: add zpci_set_irq()/zpci_clear_irq()"),
> introduced the zpci_set_irq() and zpci_clear_irq(), to be used while
> resetting a zPCI device.
> 
> Commit da995d538d3a ("s390/pci: implement reset_slot for hotplug slot"),
> mentions zpci_clear_irq() being called in the path for zpci_hot_reset_device().
> But that is not the case anymore and these functions are not called
> outside of this file. Instead zpci_hot_reset_device() relies on
> zpci_disable_device() also clearing the IRQs, but misses to reset the
> zdev->irqs_registered flag.
> 
> However after a CLP disable/enable reset, the device's IRQ are
> unregistered, but the flag zdev->irq_registered does not get cleared. It
> creates an inconsistent state and so arch_restore_msi_irqs() doesn't
> correctly restore the device's IRQ. This becomes a problem when a PCI
> driver tries to restore the state of the device through
> pci_restore_state(). Restore IRQ unconditionally for the device and remove
> the irq_registered flag as its redundant.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>

But one question: Unlike the other 2 patches in this series, this only touches s390 code.  It doesn't depend on the other 2 patches in this series, right?

If not then shouldn't this one go thru s390 rather than PCI subsystem?  Note: none of the s390 arch maintainers are on CC.

> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 1 -
>  arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c     | 9 +--------
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>

On 10/21/2025 7:07 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 10/20/25 3:02 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
>> Commit c1e18c17bda6 ("s390/pci: add zpci_set_irq()/zpci_clear_irq()"),
>> introduced the zpci_set_irq() and zpci_clear_irq(), to be used while
>> resetting a zPCI device.
>>
>> Commit da995d538d3a ("s390/pci: implement reset_slot for hotplug slot"),
>> mentions zpci_clear_irq() being called in the path for zpci_hot_reset_device().
>> But that is not the case anymore and these functions are not called
>> outside of this file. Instead zpci_hot_reset_device() relies on
>> zpci_disable_device() also clearing the IRQs, but misses to reset the
>> zdev->irqs_registered flag.
>>
>> However after a CLP disable/enable reset, the device's IRQ are
>> unregistered, but the flag zdev->irq_registered does not get cleared. It
>> creates an inconsistent state and so arch_restore_msi_irqs() doesn't
>> correctly restore the device's IRQ. This becomes a problem when a PCI
>> driver tries to restore the state of the device through
>> pci_restore_state(). Restore IRQ unconditionally for the device and remove
>> the irq_registered flag as its redundant.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>
> But one question: Unlike the other 2 patches in this series, this only touches s390 code.  It doesn't depend on the other 2 patches in this series, right?
>
> If not then shouldn't this one go thru s390 rather than PCI subsystem?  Note: none of the s390 arch maintainers are on CC.

Yes I think this could go through s390 tree as it just changes s390/pci 
code. Will submit this as a separate patch from this series.

Thanks

Farhan

>
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 1 -
>>   arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c     | 9 +--------
>>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>