kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
After discussion with bpf maintainers[1], queue_index could
be propagated to the remote XDP program by the xdp_md struct[2]
which makes this todo a misguide for future effort.
[1]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/87y0q23j2w.fsf@cloudflare.com/
[2]:https://docs.ebpf.io/linux/helper-function/bpf_xdp_adjust_meta/
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
index 703e5df1f4ef..3c05e96b7d2c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
@@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ static int cpu_map_bpf_prog_run_xdp(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu,
rxq.dev = xdpf->dev_rx;
rxq.mem.type = xdpf->mem_type;
- /* TODO: report queue_index to xdp_rxq_info */
xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
--
2.51.1.dirty
From: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 17:58:55 +0100 > After discussion with bpf maintainers[1], queue_index could > be propagated to the remote XDP program by the xdp_md struct[2] But it's not done automatically, so not aware users may get confused. Instead of just removing the TODO, I believe you should leave a comment here that the RxQ index gets lots after the frame is redirected, so if someone really wants it, he/she should use <what the second link says>. > which makes this todo a misguide for future effort. > > [1]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/87y0q23j2w.fsf@cloudflare.com/ > [2]:https://docs.ebpf.io/linux/helper-function/bpf_xdp_adjust_meta/ > > Signed-off-by: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com> Thanks, Olek
On 10/20/25 4:41 PM, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 17:58:55 +0100 > >> After discussion with bpf maintainers[1], queue_index could >> be propagated to the remote XDP program by the xdp_md struct[2] > > But it's not done automatically, so not aware users may get confused. > > Instead of just removing the TODO, I believe you should leave a comment > here that the RxQ index gets lots after the frame is redirected, so if > someone really wants it, he/she should use <what the second link says>. > Logical,I will send a v2 soon. Thanks for the review. Best Regards, Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa>> which makes this todo a misguide for future effort. >> >> [1]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/87y0q23j2w.fsf@cloudflare.com/ >> [2]:https://docs.ebpf.io/linux/helper-function/bpf_xdp_adjust_meta/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com> > Thanks, > Olek
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.