On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 07:27:39PM +0800, tanze wrote:
> Remove array_size() calls and replace vmalloc(), Due to vmalloc_array() is optimized better,
> uses fewer instructions, and handles overflow more concisely[1].
>
> Signed-off-by: tanze <tanze@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> Please ignore the previous email, a simple formatting error
> has been corrected in this one.
>
> Thanks
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> index 826b14cae4e5..7bb5605ad7fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> @@ -1061,8 +1061,7 @@ SHOW(__bch_cache)
> uint16_t q[31], *p, *cached;
> ssize_t ret;
>
> - cached = p = vmalloc(array_size(sizeof(uint16_t),
> - ca->sb.nbuckets));
> + cached = p = vmalloc_array(ca->sb.nbuckets, sizeof(uint16_t));
> if (!p)
> return -ENOMEM;
Yes, this version is better.
It will be cool if you may refine the name format in your Signed-off-by.
Thanks.
Coly Li