kernel/scs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
__scs_magic() needs a 'void *' variable, but a 'struct task_struct *'
is given. 'task_scs(tsk)' is the starting address of the task's shadow
call stack, and '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))' is the end address of the
task's shadow call stack.
Here should be '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))'.
Fixes: 5bbaf9d1fcb9 ("scs: Add support for stack usage debugging")
Signed-off-by: Jiyuan Xie <xiejiyuan@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichi Lin <zhichi.lin@vivo.com>
---
kernel/scs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/scs.c b/kernel/scs.c
index d7809affe..772488afd 100644
--- a/kernel/scs.c
+++ b/kernel/scs.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void scs_check_usage(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE))
return;
- for (p = task_scs(tsk); p < __scs_magic(tsk); ++p) {
+ for (p = task_scs(tsk); p < __scs_magic(task_scs(tsk)); ++p) {
if (!READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*p))
break;
used += sizeof(*p);
--
2.25.1
On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 1:23 AM Zhichi Lin <zhichi.lin@vivo.com> wrote:
>
> __scs_magic() needs a 'void *' variable, but a 'struct task_struct *'
> is given. 'task_scs(tsk)' is the starting address of the task's shadow
> call stack, and '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))' is the end address of the
> task's shadow call stack.
> Here should be '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))'.
>
> Fixes: 5bbaf9d1fcb9 ("scs: Add support for stack usage debugging")
> Signed-off-by: Jiyuan Xie <xiejiyuan@vivo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhichi Lin <zhichi.lin@vivo.com>
> ---
> kernel/scs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/scs.c b/kernel/scs.c
> index d7809affe..772488afd 100644
> --- a/kernel/scs.c
> +++ b/kernel/scs.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void scs_check_usage(struct task_struct *tsk)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE))
> return;
>
> - for (p = task_scs(tsk); p < __scs_magic(tsk); ++p) {
> + for (p = task_scs(tsk); p < __scs_magic(task_scs(tsk)); ++p) {
> if (!READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*p))
> break;
> used += sizeof(*p);
Looks correct to me. Thanks for the fix!
Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Sami
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.