fs/exfat/nls.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
In exfat_nls_to_ucs2(), if there is no NLS loss and the char-to-ucs2
conversion is successfully completed, the variable "i" will have the same
value as len.
However, exfat_nls_to_ucs2() checks p_cstring[i] to determine whether nls
is lost immediately after the while loop ends, so if len is FSLABEL_MAX,
"i" will also be FSLABEL_MAX immediately after the while loop ends,
resulting in an out-of-bounds read of 1 byte from the p_cstring stack
memory.
Therefore, to prevent this and properly determine whether nls has been
lost, it should be modified to check if "i" and len are equal, rather than
dereferencing p_cstring.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: syzbot+98cc76a76de46b3714d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=98cc76a76de46b3714d4
Fixes: 370e812b3ec1 ("exfat: add nls operations")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
---
fs/exfat/nls.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/exfat/nls.c b/fs/exfat/nls.c
index 8243d94ceaf4..de06abe426d7 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/nls.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/nls.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int exfat_nls_to_ucs2(struct super_block *sb,
unilen++;
}
- if (p_cstring[i] != '\0')
+ if (i != len)
lossy |= NLS_NAME_OVERLEN;
*uniname = '\0';
--
On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 2:04 PM Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In exfat_nls_to_ucs2(), if there is no NLS loss and the char-to-ucs2
> conversion is successfully completed, the variable "i" will have the same
> value as len.
>
> However, exfat_nls_to_ucs2() checks p_cstring[i] to determine whether nls
> is lost immediately after the while loop ends, so if len is FSLABEL_MAX,
> "i" will also be FSLABEL_MAX immediately after the while loop ends,
> resulting in an out-of-bounds read of 1 byte from the p_cstring stack
> memory.
>
> Therefore, to prevent this and properly determine whether nls has been
> lost, it should be modified to check if "i" and len are equal, rather than
> dereferencing p_cstring.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: syzbot+98cc76a76de46b3714d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=98cc76a76de46b3714d4
> Fixes: 370e812b3ec1 ("exfat: add nls operations")
> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/exfat/nls.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/nls.c b/fs/exfat/nls.c
> index 8243d94ceaf4..de06abe426d7 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/nls.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/nls.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int exfat_nls_to_ucs2(struct super_block *sb,
> unilen++;
> }
>
> - if (p_cstring[i] != '\0')
> + if (i != len)
> lossy |= NLS_NAME_OVERLEN;
As I said before, the core problem is passing an incorrect length in the ioctl
FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL call. While your change may fix the symptom,
it doesn't fix the root cause.
Furthermore, NLS_NAME_OVERLEN macro is unnecessary.
That will result in different errors when creating a file with trailing periods
with utf8 and the other iocharset.
Please remove it and make the same error handling for maximum length
consistent with exfat_utf8_to_utf16().
>
> *uniname = '\0';
> --
On Friday 10 October 2025 14:03:29 Jeongjun Park wrote:
> In exfat_nls_to_ucs2(), if there is no NLS loss and the char-to-ucs2
> conversion is successfully completed, the variable "i" will have the same
> value as len.
>
> However, exfat_nls_to_ucs2() checks p_cstring[i] to determine whether nls
> is lost immediately after the while loop ends, so if len is FSLABEL_MAX,
> "i" will also be FSLABEL_MAX immediately after the while loop ends,
> resulting in an out-of-bounds read of 1 byte from the p_cstring stack
> memory.
>
> Therefore, to prevent this and properly determine whether nls has been
> lost, it should be modified to check if "i" and len are equal, rather than
> dereferencing p_cstring.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: syzbot+98cc76a76de46b3714d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=98cc76a76de46b3714d4
> Fixes: 370e812b3ec1 ("exfat: add nls operations")
> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/exfat/nls.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/nls.c b/fs/exfat/nls.c
> index 8243d94ceaf4..de06abe426d7 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/nls.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/nls.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int exfat_nls_to_ucs2(struct super_block *sb,
> unilen++;
> }
>
> - if (p_cstring[i] != '\0')
> + if (i != len)
> lossy |= NLS_NAME_OVERLEN;
>
> *uniname = '\0';
> --
Looks good for me,
Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.