[PATCH v7 06/14] btrfs: use the new ->i_state accessors

Mateusz Guzik posted 14 patches 2 months, 1 week ago
[PATCH v7 06/14] btrfs: use the new ->i_state accessors
Posted by Mateusz Guzik 2 months, 1 week ago
Change generated with coccinelle and fixed up by hand as appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---

cheat sheet:

If ->i_lock is held, then:

state = inode->i_state          => state = inode_state_read(inode)
inode->i_state |= (I_A | I_B)   => inode_state_set(inode, I_A | I_B)
inode->i_state &= ~(I_A | I_B)  => inode_state_clear(inode, I_A | I_B)
inode->i_state = I_A | I_B      => inode_state_assign(inode, I_A | I_B)

If ->i_lock is not held or only held conditionally:

state = inode->i_state          => state = inode_state_read_once(inode)
inode->i_state |= (I_A | I_B)   => inode_state_set_raw(inode, I_A | I_B)
inode->i_state &= ~(I_A | I_B)  => inode_state_clear_raw(inode, I_A | I_B)
inode->i_state = I_A | I_B      => inode_state_assign_raw(inode, I_A | I_B)

 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 3b1b3a0553ee..433ffe231546 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3884,7 +3884,7 @@ static int btrfs_add_inode_to_root(struct btrfs_inode *inode, bool prealloc)
 		ASSERT(ret != -ENOMEM);
 		return ret;
 	} else if (existing) {
-		WARN_ON(!(existing->vfs_inode.i_state & (I_WILL_FREE | I_FREEING)));
+		WARN_ON(!(inode_state_read_once(&existing->vfs_inode) & (I_WILL_FREE | I_FREEING)));
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -5361,7 +5361,7 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode)
 	struct extent_io_tree *io_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree;
 	struct rb_node *node;
 
-	ASSERT(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
+	ASSERT(inode_state_read_once(inode) & I_FREEING);
 	truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
 
 	btrfs_drop_extent_map_range(BTRFS_I(inode), 0, (u64)-1, false);
@@ -5799,7 +5799,7 @@ struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_iget_path(u64 ino, struct btrfs_root *root,
 	if (!inode)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	if (!(inode->vfs_inode.i_state & I_NEW))
+	if (!(inode_state_read_once(&inode->vfs_inode) & I_NEW))
 		return inode;
 
 	ret = btrfs_read_locked_inode(inode, path);
@@ -5823,7 +5823,7 @@ struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_iget(u64 ino, struct btrfs_root *root)
 	if (!inode)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	if (!(inode->vfs_inode.i_state & I_NEW))
+	if (!(inode_state_read_once(&inode->vfs_inode) & I_NEW))
 		return inode;
 
 	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
@@ -7480,7 +7480,7 @@ static void btrfs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
 	u64 page_start = folio_pos(folio);
 	u64 page_end = page_start + folio_size(folio) - 1;
 	u64 cur;
-	int inode_evicting = inode->vfs_inode.i_state & I_FREEING;
+	int inode_evicting = inode_state_read_once(&inode->vfs_inode) & I_FREEING;
 
 	/*
 	 * We have folio locked so no new ordered extent can be created on this
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] btrfs: use the new ->i_state accessors
Posted by Jan Kara 2 months, 1 week ago
On Thu 09-10-25 09:59:20, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Change generated with coccinelle and fixed up by hand as appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
> 
> cheat sheet:
> 
> If ->i_lock is held, then:
> 
> state = inode->i_state          => state = inode_state_read(inode)
> inode->i_state |= (I_A | I_B)   => inode_state_set(inode, I_A | I_B)
> inode->i_state &= ~(I_A | I_B)  => inode_state_clear(inode, I_A | I_B)
> inode->i_state = I_A | I_B      => inode_state_assign(inode, I_A | I_B)
> 
> If ->i_lock is not held or only held conditionally:
> 
> state = inode->i_state          => state = inode_state_read_once(inode)
> inode->i_state |= (I_A | I_B)   => inode_state_set_raw(inode, I_A | I_B)
> inode->i_state &= ~(I_A | I_B)  => inode_state_clear_raw(inode, I_A | I_B)
> inode->i_state = I_A | I_B      => inode_state_assign_raw(inode, I_A | I_B)
> 
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 3b1b3a0553ee..433ffe231546 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -3884,7 +3884,7 @@ static int btrfs_add_inode_to_root(struct btrfs_inode *inode, bool prealloc)
>  		ASSERT(ret != -ENOMEM);
>  		return ret;
>  	} else if (existing) {
> -		WARN_ON(!(existing->vfs_inode.i_state & (I_WILL_FREE | I_FREEING)));
> +		WARN_ON(!(inode_state_read_once(&existing->vfs_inode) & (I_WILL_FREE | I_FREEING)));
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -5361,7 +5361,7 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode)
>  	struct extent_io_tree *io_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree;
>  	struct rb_node *node;
>  
> -	ASSERT(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
> +	ASSERT(inode_state_read_once(inode) & I_FREEING);
>  	truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
>  
>  	btrfs_drop_extent_map_range(BTRFS_I(inode), 0, (u64)-1, false);
> @@ -5799,7 +5799,7 @@ struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_iget_path(u64 ino, struct btrfs_root *root,
>  	if (!inode)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -	if (!(inode->vfs_inode.i_state & I_NEW))
> +	if (!(inode_state_read_once(&inode->vfs_inode) & I_NEW))
>  		return inode;
>  
>  	ret = btrfs_read_locked_inode(inode, path);
> @@ -5823,7 +5823,7 @@ struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_iget(u64 ino, struct btrfs_root *root)
>  	if (!inode)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -	if (!(inode->vfs_inode.i_state & I_NEW))
> +	if (!(inode_state_read_once(&inode->vfs_inode) & I_NEW))
>  		return inode;
>  
>  	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> @@ -7480,7 +7480,7 @@ static void btrfs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
>  	u64 page_start = folio_pos(folio);
>  	u64 page_end = page_start + folio_size(folio) - 1;
>  	u64 cur;
> -	int inode_evicting = inode->vfs_inode.i_state & I_FREEING;
> +	int inode_evicting = inode_state_read_once(&inode->vfs_inode) & I_FREEING;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We have folio locked so no new ordered extent can be created on this
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR