.../selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c | 27 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Rename guest_test_{phys,virt}_mem to g{p,v}a in the pre-fault memory test
to shorten line lengths and to use standard terminology.
No functional change intended.
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c | 27 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
index f04768c1d2e4..6db75946a4f8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ static void pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 base_gpa, u64 offset,
static void __test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
{
+ uint64_t gpa, gva, alignment, guest_page_size;
const struct vm_shape shape = {
.mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
.type = vm_type,
@@ -170,35 +171,31 @@ static void __test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct ucall uc;
- uint64_t guest_test_phys_mem;
- uint64_t guest_test_virt_mem;
- uint64_t alignment, guest_page_size;
-
vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code);
alignment = guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size;
- guest_test_phys_mem = (vm->max_gfn - TEST_NPAGES) * guest_page_size;
+ gpa = (vm->max_gfn - TEST_NPAGES) * guest_page_size;
#ifdef __s390x__
alignment = max(0x100000UL, guest_page_size);
#else
alignment = SZ_2M;
#endif
- guest_test_phys_mem = align_down(guest_test_phys_mem, alignment);
- guest_test_virt_mem = guest_test_phys_mem & ((1ULL << (vm->va_bits - 1)) - 1);
+ gpa = align_down(gpa, alignment);
+ gva = gpa & ((1ULL << (vm->va_bits - 1)) - 1);
- vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
- guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
+ vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, gpa,
+ TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
- virt_map(vm, guest_test_virt_mem, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_NPAGES);
+ virt_map(vm, gva, gpa, TEST_NPAGES);
if (private)
- vm_mem_set_private(vm, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SIZE);
+ vm_mem_set_private(vm, gpa, TEST_SIZE);
- pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, 0, SZ_2M, 0, private);
- pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE, private);
- pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, private);
+ pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, 0, SZ_2M, 0, private);
+ pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE, private);
+ pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, private);
- vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, guest_test_virt_mem);
+ vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, gva);
vcpu_run(vcpu);
run = vcpu->run;
base-commit: efcebc8f7aeeba15feb1a5bde70af74d96bf1a76
--
2.51.0.710.ga91ca5db03-goog
On Tue, 07 Oct 2025 15:45:15 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Rename guest_test_{phys,virt}_mem to g{p,v}a in the pre-fault memory test
> to shorten line lengths and to use standard terminology.
>
> No functional change intended.
Applied to kvm-x86 selftests, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: selftests: Use "gpa" and "gva" for local variable names in pre-fault test
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/9e4ce7a89e0b
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
Reviewed-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 09:45:14AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2025 15:45:15 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Rename guest_test_{phys,virt}_mem to g{p,v}a in the pre-fault memory test
> > to shorten line lengths and to use standard terminology.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
>
> Applied to kvm-x86 selftests, thanks!
>
> [1/1] KVM: selftests: Use "gpa" and "gva" for local variable names in pre-fault test
> https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/9e4ce7a89e0b
>
> --
> https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 03:45:15PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Rename guest_test_{phys,virt}_mem to g{p,v}a in the pre-fault memory test
> to shorten line lengths and to use standard terminology.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c | 27 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
> index f04768c1d2e4..6db75946a4f8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ static void pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 base_gpa, u64 offset,
>
> static void __test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
> {
> + uint64_t gpa, gva, alignment, guest_page_size;
> const struct vm_shape shape = {
> .mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
> .type = vm_type,
> @@ -170,35 +171,31 @@ static void __test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
> struct kvm_vm *vm;
> struct ucall uc;
>
> - uint64_t guest_test_phys_mem;
> - uint64_t guest_test_virt_mem;
> - uint64_t alignment, guest_page_size;
> -
> vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code);
>
> alignment = guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size;
> - guest_test_phys_mem = (vm->max_gfn - TEST_NPAGES) * guest_page_size;
> + gpa = (vm->max_gfn - TEST_NPAGES) * guest_page_size;
> #ifdef __s390x__
> alignment = max(0x100000UL, guest_page_size);
> #else
> alignment = SZ_2M;
> #endif
> - guest_test_phys_mem = align_down(guest_test_phys_mem, alignment);
> - guest_test_virt_mem = guest_test_phys_mem & ((1ULL << (vm->va_bits - 1)) - 1);
> + gpa = align_down(gpa, alignment);
> + gva = gpa & ((1ULL << (vm->va_bits - 1)) - 1);
>
> - vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
> - guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
> + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, gpa,
Wrap at 80 characters?
> + TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
> private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
> - virt_map(vm, guest_test_virt_mem, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_NPAGES);
> + virt_map(vm, gva, gpa, TEST_NPAGES);
>
> if (private)
> - vm_mem_set_private(vm, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SIZE);
> + vm_mem_set_private(vm, gpa, TEST_SIZE);
>
> - pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, 0, SZ_2M, 0, private);
> - pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE, private);
> - pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, private);
> + pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, 0, SZ_2M, 0, private);
> + pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE, private);
> + pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, private);
>
> - vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, guest_test_virt_mem);
> + vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, gva);
Should we cleanup guest_code() as below?
-static void guest_code(uint64_t base_gpa)
+static void guest_code(uint64_t base_gva)
{
volatile uint64_t val __used;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < TEST_NPAGES; i++) {
- uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *)(base_gpa + i * PAGE_SIZE);
+ uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *)(base_gva + i * PAGE_SIZE);
val = *src;
}
> vcpu_run(vcpu);
>
> run = vcpu->run;
>
> base-commit: efcebc8f7aeeba15feb1a5bde70af74d96bf1a76
> --
> 2.51.0.710.ga91ca5db03-goog
>
>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025, Yan Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 03:45:15PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > - guest_test_phys_mem = align_down(guest_test_phys_mem, alignment);
> > - guest_test_virt_mem = guest_test_phys_mem & ((1ULL << (vm->va_bits - 1)) - 1);
> > + gpa = align_down(gpa, alignment);
> > + gva = gpa & ((1ULL << (vm->va_bits - 1)) - 1);
> >
> > - vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
> > - guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
> > + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, gpa,
> Wrap at 80 characters?
>
> > + TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
Hmm, yeah. Probably this?
vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, gpa, TEST_SLOT,
TEST_NPAGES, private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
which I like more than:
vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, gpa, TEST_SLOT,
TEST_NPAGES,
private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
> > private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
> > - virt_map(vm, guest_test_virt_mem, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_NPAGES);
> > + virt_map(vm, gva, gpa, TEST_NPAGES);
> >
> > if (private)
> > - vm_mem_set_private(vm, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SIZE);
> > + vm_mem_set_private(vm, gpa, TEST_SIZE);
> >
> > - pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, 0, SZ_2M, 0, private);
> > - pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE, private);
> > - pre_fault_memory(vcpu, guest_test_phys_mem, TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, private);
> > + pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, 0, SZ_2M, 0, private);
> > + pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE, private);
> > + pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, private);
> >
> > - vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, guest_test_virt_mem);
> > + vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, gva);
> Should we cleanup guest_code() as below?
>
> -static void guest_code(uint64_t base_gpa)
> +static void guest_code(uint64_t base_gva)
> {
> volatile uint64_t val __used;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < TEST_NPAGES; i++) {
> - uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *)(base_gpa + i * PAGE_SIZE);
> + uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *)(base_gva + i * PAGE_SIZE);
>
> val = *src;
> }
Yah, no reason not to (lot's of tests assume GPA==GVA, but that's not a good
reason to be deliberately confusing).
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.