This is v4. It is based on the next-20250929 branch. I am pretty done
with it, if no objections, appreciate if it is taken.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250704152537.55724-1-urezki@gmail.com/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/7/332
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251001192647.195204-1-urezki@gmail.com/

v3 -> v4:
 - collected Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags;
 - Fixed "Warning: mm/vmalloc.c:3889 bad line:" reported by robot.

Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) (10):
  lib/test_vmalloc: add no_block_alloc_test case
  lib/test_vmalloc: Remove xfail condition check
  mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in alloc_vmap_area()
  mm/vmalloc: Defer freeing partly initialized vm_struct
  mm/vmalloc: Handle non-blocking GFP in __vmalloc_area_node()
  mm/kasan: Support non-blocking GFP in kasan_populate_vmalloc()
  kmsan: Remove hard-coded GFP_KERNEL flags
  mm: Skip might_alloc() warnings when PF_MEMALLOC is set
  mm/vmalloc: Update __vmalloc_node_range() documentation
  mm: kvmalloc: Add non-blocking support for vmalloc

 include/linux/kmsan.h    |   6 +-
 include/linux/sched/mm.h |   3 +
 include/linux/vmalloc.h  |   8 +-
 lib/test_vmalloc.c       |  28 ++++++-
 mm/internal.h            |   4 +-
 mm/kasan/shadow.c        |  12 +--
 mm/kmsan/shadow.c        |   6 +-
 mm/percpu-vm.c           |   2 +-
 mm/slub.c                |  19 +++--
 mm/vmalloc.c             | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 10 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.3

On Tue,  7 Oct 2025 14:20:25 +0200 "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is v4. It is based on the next-20250929 branch. I am pretty done
> with it, if no objections, appreciate if it is taken.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250704152537.55724-1-urezki@gmail.com/
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/7/332
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251001192647.195204-1-urezki@gmail.com/

It would be nice (and conventional) to have a [0/N]
introduction/overview, please.  I went back through the previous
iterations and could have kind of used
https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/7/332, but that doesn't look very
applicable.

On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 02:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue,  7 Oct 2025 14:20:25 +0200 "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is v4. It is based on the next-20250929 branch. I am pretty done
> > with it, if no objections, appreciate if it is taken.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250704152537.55724-1-urezki@gmail.com/
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/7/332
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251001192647.195204-1-urezki@gmail.com/
> 
> It would be nice (and conventional) to have a [0/N]
> introduction/overview, please.  I went back through the previous
> iterations and could have kind of used
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/8/7/332, but that doesn't look very
> applicable.
> 
OK, next time i will numerate links so it is easier to keep track of it.

Thank you!

--
Uladzislau Rezki