[PATCH v6 5/5] rust: bitfield: Add KUNIT tests for bitfield

Joel Fernandes posted 5 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
[PATCH v6 5/5] rust: bitfield: Add KUNIT tests for bitfield
Posted by Joel Fernandes 2 months, 2 weeks ago
Add KUNIT tests to make sure the macro is working correctly.

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
---
 rust/kernel/bitfield.rs | 323 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 323 insertions(+)

diff --git a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
index 09cd5741598c..f0e341a1a979 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
@@ -329,3 +329,326 @@ fn default() -> Self {
         }
     };
 }
+
+#[::kernel::macros::kunit_tests(kernel_bitfield)]
+mod tests {
+    use core::convert::TryFrom;
+
+    // Enum types for testing => and ?=> conversions
+    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
+    enum MemoryType {
+        #[default]
+        Unmapped = 0,
+        Normal = 1,
+        Device = 2,
+        Reserved = 3,
+    }
+
+    impl TryFrom<u8> for MemoryType {
+        type Error = u8;
+        fn try_from(value: u8) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> {
+            match value {
+                0 => Ok(MemoryType::Unmapped),
+                1 => Ok(MemoryType::Normal),
+                2 => Ok(MemoryType::Device),
+                3 => Ok(MemoryType::Reserved),
+                _ => Err(value),
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    impl From<MemoryType> for u64 {
+        fn from(mt: MemoryType) -> u64 {
+            mt as u64
+        }
+    }
+
+    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
+    enum Priority {
+        #[default]
+        Low = 0,
+        Medium = 1,
+        High = 2,
+        Critical = 3,
+    }
+
+    impl From<u8> for Priority {
+        fn from(value: u8) -> Self {
+            match value & 0x3 {
+                0 => Priority::Low,
+                1 => Priority::Medium,
+                2 => Priority::High,
+                _ => Priority::Critical,
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    impl From<Priority> for u16 {
+        fn from(p: Priority) -> u16 {
+            p as u16
+        }
+    }
+
+    bitfield! {
+        struct TestPageTableEntry(u64) {
+            0:0       present     as bool;
+            1:1       writable    as bool;
+            11:9      available   as u8;
+            13:12     mem_type    as u8 ?=> MemoryType;
+            17:14     extended_type as u8 ?=> MemoryType;  // For testing failures
+            51:12     pfn         as u64;
+            51:12     pfn_overlap as u64;
+            61:52     available2  as u16;
+        }
+    }
+
+    bitfield! {
+        struct TestControlRegister(u16) {
+            0:0       enable      as bool;
+            3:1       mode        as u8;
+            5:4       priority    as u8 => Priority;
+            7:4       priority_nibble as u8;
+            15:8      channel     as u8;
+        }
+    }
+
+    bitfield! {
+        struct TestStatusRegister(u8) {
+            0:0       ready       as bool;
+            1:1       error       as bool;
+            3:2       state       as u8;
+            7:4       reserved    as u8;
+            7:0       full_byte   as u8;  // For entire register
+        }
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_single_bits() {
+        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
+
+        assert!(!pte.present());
+        assert!(!pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
+
+        pte = pte.set_present(true);
+        assert!(pte.present());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
+
+        pte = pte.set_writable(true);
+        assert!(pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3);
+
+        pte = pte.set_writable(false);
+        assert!(!pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
+
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0);
+        pte = pte.set_available(0x5);
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x5);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0xA01);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_range_fields() {
+        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
+
+        pte = pte.set_pfn(0x123456);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0x123456);
+        // Test overlapping field reads same value
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), 0x123456);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x123456000);
+
+        pte = pte.set_available(0x7);
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x123456E00);
+
+        pte = pte.set_available2(0x3FF);
+        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123456E00);
+
+        // Test TryFrom with ?=> for MemoryType
+        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Device);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123456E00);
+
+        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Normal);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Normal));
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123455E00);
+
+        // Test all valid values for mem_type
+        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123457E00);
+
+        // Test failure case using extended_type field which has 4 bits (0-15)
+        // MemoryType only handles 0-3, so values 4-15 should return Err
+        let mut raw = pte.into();
+        // Set bits 17:14 to 7 (invalid for MemoryType)
+        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(14..=17)) | (0x7 << 14);
+        let invalid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
+        // Should return Err with the invalid value
+        assert_eq!(invalid_pte.extended_type(), Err(0x7));
+
+        // Test a valid value after testing invalid to ensure both cases work
+        // Set bits 17:14 to 2 (valid: Device)
+        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(14..=17)) | (0x2 << 14);
+        let valid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
+        assert_eq!(valid_pte.extended_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
+
+        let max_pfn = ::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(0..=39);
+        pte = pte.set_pfn(max_pfn);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), max_pfn);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), max_pfn);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_builder_pattern() {
+        let pte = TestPageTableEntry::default()
+            .set_present(true)
+            .set_writable(true)
+            .set_available(0x7)
+            .set_pfn(0xABCDEF)
+            .set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved)
+            .set_available2(0x3FF);
+
+        assert!(pte.present());
+        assert!(pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0xABCDEF);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), 0xABCDEF);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
+        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_raw_operations() {
+        let raw_value = 0x3FF0000003123E03u64;
+
+        let pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), raw_value);
+
+        assert!(pte.present());
+        assert!(pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0x3123);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), 0x3123);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
+        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
+
+        // Test using direct constructor syntax TestStruct(value)
+        let pte2 = TestPageTableEntry(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte2), raw_value);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_u16_bitfield() {
+        let mut ctrl = TestControlRegister::default();
+
+        assert!(!ctrl.enable());
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.mode(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority(), Priority::Low);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority_nibble(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.channel(), 0);
+
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_enable(true);
+        assert!(ctrl.enable());
+
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_mode(0x5);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.mode(), 0x5);
+
+        // Test From conversion with =>
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_priority(Priority::High);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority(), Priority::High);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority_nibble(), 0x2); // High = 2 in bits 5:4
+
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_channel(0xAB);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.channel(), 0xAB);
+
+        // Test overlapping fields
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_priority_nibble(0xF);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority_nibble(), 0xF);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority(), Priority::Critical); // bits 5:4 = 0x3
+
+        let ctrl2 = TestControlRegister::default()
+            .set_enable(true)
+            .set_mode(0x3)
+            .set_priority(Priority::Medium)
+            .set_channel(0x42);
+
+        assert!(ctrl2.enable());
+        assert_eq!(ctrl2.mode(), 0x3);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl2.priority(), Priority::Medium);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl2.channel(), 0x42);
+
+        let raw_value: u16 = 0x4217;
+        let ctrl3 = TestControlRegister(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u16::from(ctrl3), raw_value);
+        assert!(ctrl3.enable());
+        assert_eq!(ctrl3.priority(), Priority::Medium);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl3.priority_nibble(), 0x1);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl3.channel(), 0x42);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_u8_bitfield() {
+        let mut status = TestStatusRegister::default();
+
+        assert!(!status.ready());
+        assert!(!status.error());
+        assert_eq!(status.state(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(status.reserved(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0);
+
+        status = status.set_ready(true);
+        assert!(status.ready());
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x01);
+
+        status = status.set_error(true);
+        assert!(status.error());
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x03);
+
+        status = status.set_state(0x3);
+        assert_eq!(status.state(), 0x3);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x0F);
+
+        status = status.set_reserved(0xA);
+        assert_eq!(status.reserved(), 0xA);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0xAF);
+
+        // Test overlapping field
+        status = status.set_full_byte(0x55);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x55);
+        assert!(status.ready());
+        assert!(!status.error());
+        assert_eq!(status.state(), 0x1);
+        assert_eq!(status.reserved(), 0x5);
+
+        let status2 = TestStatusRegister::default()
+            .set_ready(true)
+            .set_state(0x2)
+            .set_reserved(0x5);
+
+        assert!(status2.ready());
+        assert!(!status2.error());
+        assert_eq!(status2.state(), 0x2);
+        assert_eq!(status2.reserved(), 0x5);
+        assert_eq!(status2.full_byte(), 0x59);
+
+        let raw_value: u8 = 0x59;
+        let status3 = TestStatusRegister(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u8::from(status3), raw_value);
+        assert!(status3.ready());
+        assert!(!status3.error());
+        assert_eq!(status3.state(), 0x2);
+        assert_eq!(status3.reserved(), 0x5);
+        assert_eq!(status3.full_byte(), 0x59);
+
+        let status4 = TestStatusRegister(0xFF);
+        assert!(status4.ready());
+        assert!(status4.error());
+        assert_eq!(status4.state(), 0x3);
+        assert_eq!(status4.reserved(), 0xF);
+        assert_eq!(status4.full_byte(), 0xFF);
+    }
+}
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] rust: bitfield: Add KUNIT tests for bitfield
Posted by Alexandre Courbot 2 months, 1 week ago
On Sat Oct 4, 2025 at 12:47 AM JST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Add KUNIT tests to make sure the macro is working correctly.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  rust/kernel/bitfield.rs | 323 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 323 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
> index 09cd5741598c..f0e341a1a979 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
> @@ -329,3 +329,326 @@ fn default() -> Self {
>          }
>      };
>  }
> +
> +#[::kernel::macros::kunit_tests(kernel_bitfield)]
> +mod tests {
> +    use core::convert::TryFrom;
> +
> +    // Enum types for testing => and ?=> conversions
> +    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
> +    enum MemoryType {
> +        #[default]
> +        Unmapped = 0,
> +        Normal = 1,
> +        Device = 2,
> +        Reserved = 3,
> +    }
> +
> +    impl TryFrom<u8> for MemoryType {
> +        type Error = u8;
> +        fn try_from(value: u8) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> {
> +            match value {
> +                0 => Ok(MemoryType::Unmapped),
> +                1 => Ok(MemoryType::Normal),
> +                2 => Ok(MemoryType::Device),
> +                3 => Ok(MemoryType::Reserved),
> +                _ => Err(value),
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    impl From<MemoryType> for u64 {
> +        fn from(mt: MemoryType) -> u64 {
> +            mt as u64
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
> +    enum Priority {
> +        #[default]
> +        Low = 0,
> +        Medium = 1,
> +        High = 2,
> +        Critical = 3,
> +    }
> +
> +    impl From<u8> for Priority {
> +        fn from(value: u8) -> Self {
> +            match value & 0x3 {
> +                0 => Priority::Low,
> +                1 => Priority::Medium,
> +                2 => Priority::High,
> +                _ => Priority::Critical,
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    impl From<Priority> for u16 {
> +        fn from(p: Priority) -> u16 {
> +            p as u16
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    bitfield! {
> +        struct TestPageTableEntry(u64) {
> +            0:0       present     as bool;
> +            1:1       writable    as bool;
> +            11:9      available   as u8;
> +            13:12     mem_type    as u8 ?=> MemoryType;
> +            17:14     extended_type as u8 ?=> MemoryType;  // For testing failures
> +            51:12     pfn         as u64;

Is the overlap with `mem_type` and `extended_type` on purpose? It looks
strange to me that the PFN also includes the memory type.

> +            51:12     pfn_overlap as u64;

If `pfn` needs to be adjusted then I guess this one also needs to be.

> +            61:52     available2  as u16;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    bitfield! {
> +        struct TestControlRegister(u16) {
> +            0:0       enable      as bool;
> +            3:1       mode        as u8;
> +            5:4       priority    as u8 => Priority;
> +            7:4       priority_nibble as u8;
> +            15:8      channel     as u8;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    bitfield! {
> +        struct TestStatusRegister(u8) {
> +            0:0       ready       as bool;
> +            1:1       error       as bool;
> +            3:2       state       as u8;
> +            7:4       reserved    as u8;
> +            7:0       full_byte   as u8;  // For entire register
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    #[test]
> +    fn test_single_bits() {
> +        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
> +
> +        assert!(!pte.present());
> +        assert!(!pte.writable());
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
> +
> +        pte = pte.set_present(true);
> +        assert!(pte.present());
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
> +
> +        pte = pte.set_writable(true);
> +        assert!(pte.writable());
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3);
> +
> +        pte = pte.set_writable(false);
> +        assert!(!pte.writable());
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
> +
> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0);
> +        pte = pte.set_available(0x5);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x5);
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0xA01);
> +    }
> +
> +    #[test]
> +    fn test_range_fields() {
> +        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
> +
> +        pte = pte.set_pfn(0x123456);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0x123456);
> +        // Test overlapping field reads same value
> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), 0x123456);
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x123456000);
> +
> +        pte = pte.set_available(0x7);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x123456E00);
> +
> +        pte = pte.set_available2(0x3FF);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123456E00);
> +
> +        // Test TryFrom with ?=> for MemoryType
> +        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Device);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123456E00);
> +
> +        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Normal);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Normal));
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123455E00);
> +
> +        // Test all valid values for mem_type
> +        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123457E00);
> +
> +        // Test failure case using extended_type field which has 4 bits (0-15)
> +        // MemoryType only handles 0-3, so values 4-15 should return Err
> +        let mut raw = pte.into();
> +        // Set bits 17:14 to 7 (invalid for MemoryType)
> +        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(14..=17)) | (0x7 << 14);
> +        let invalid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
> +        // Should return Err with the invalid value
> +        assert_eq!(invalid_pte.extended_type(), Err(0x7));
> +
> +        // Test a valid value after testing invalid to ensure both cases work
> +        // Set bits 17:14 to 2 (valid: Device)
> +        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(14..=17)) | (0x2 << 14);
> +        let valid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
> +        assert_eq!(valid_pte.extended_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
> +
> +        let max_pfn = ::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(0..=39);
> +        pte = pte.set_pfn(max_pfn);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), max_pfn);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), max_pfn);
> +    }
> +
> +    #[test]
> +    fn test_builder_pattern() {
> +        let pte = TestPageTableEntry::default()
> +            .set_present(true)
> +            .set_writable(true)
> +            .set_available(0x7)
> +            .set_pfn(0xABCDEF)
> +            .set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved)
> +            .set_available2(0x3FF);
> +
> +        assert!(pte.present());
> +        assert!(pte.writable());
> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0xABCDEF);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), 0xABCDEF);
> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
> +        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);

Maybe check the raw value here as well, although I guess the previous
test already covered this anyway.

With these points confirmed,

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] rust: bitfield: Add KUNIT tests for bitfield
Posted by Joel Fernandes 2 months, 1 week ago

On 10/6/2025 6:37 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Sat Oct 4, 2025 at 12:47 AM JST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Add KUNIT tests to make sure the macro is working correctly.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  rust/kernel/bitfield.rs | 323 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 323 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
>> index 09cd5741598c..f0e341a1a979 100644
>> --- a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
>> +++ b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
>> @@ -329,3 +329,326 @@ fn default() -> Self {
>>          }
>>      };
>>  }
>> +
>> +#[::kernel::macros::kunit_tests(kernel_bitfield)]
>> +mod tests {
>> +    use core::convert::TryFrom;
>> +
>> +    // Enum types for testing => and ?=> conversions
>> +    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
>> +    enum MemoryType {
>> +        #[default]
>> +        Unmapped = 0,
>> +        Normal = 1,
>> +        Device = 2,
>> +        Reserved = 3,
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    impl TryFrom<u8> for MemoryType {
>> +        type Error = u8;
>> +        fn try_from(value: u8) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> {
>> +            match value {
>> +                0 => Ok(MemoryType::Unmapped),
>> +                1 => Ok(MemoryType::Normal),
>> +                2 => Ok(MemoryType::Device),
>> +                3 => Ok(MemoryType::Reserved),
>> +                _ => Err(value),
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    impl From<MemoryType> for u64 {
>> +        fn from(mt: MemoryType) -> u64 {
>> +            mt as u64
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
>> +    enum Priority {
>> +        #[default]
>> +        Low = 0,
>> +        Medium = 1,
>> +        High = 2,
>> +        Critical = 3,
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    impl From<u8> for Priority {
>> +        fn from(value: u8) -> Self {
>> +            match value & 0x3 {
>> +                0 => Priority::Low,
>> +                1 => Priority::Medium,
>> +                2 => Priority::High,
>> +                _ => Priority::Critical,
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    impl From<Priority> for u16 {
>> +        fn from(p: Priority) -> u16 {
>> +            p as u16
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    bitfield! {
>> +        struct TestPageTableEntry(u64) {
>> +            0:0       present     as bool;
>> +            1:1       writable    as bool;
>> +            11:9      available   as u8;
>> +            13:12     mem_type    as u8 ?=> MemoryType;
>> +            17:14     extended_type as u8 ?=> MemoryType;  // For testing failures
>> +            51:12     pfn         as u64;
> 
> Is the overlap with `mem_type` and `extended_type` on purpose? 

Yes, here I was testing the failure mode of ?=> without having to introduce a
new enum type. But I could just do so with mem_type by adding more bits to it,
so I'll do that and remove extended_type.

> It looks strange to me that the PFN also includes the memory type.

I agree with this (even though these structs are just approximately accurate and
for testing purposes). Since we're testing overlap already in later tests, I
will just remove it from this test.

Following is the new struct now, hope it looks ok:

    bitfield! {
        struct TestPageTableEntry(u64) {
            0:0       present     as bool;
            1:1       writable    as bool;
            11:9      available   as u8;
            15:12     mem_type    as u8 ?=> MemoryType;
            51:16     pfn         as u64;
            61:52     available2  as u16;
        }
    }

>> +            51:12     pfn_overlap as u64;
> 
> If `pfn` needs to be adjusted then I guess this one also needs to be.
> 
>> +            61:52     available2  as u16;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    bitfield! {
>> +        struct TestControlRegister(u16) {
>> +            0:0       enable      as bool;
>> +            3:1       mode        as u8;
>> +            5:4       priority    as u8 => Priority;
>> +            7:4       priority_nibble as u8;
>> +            15:8      channel     as u8;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    bitfield! {
>> +        struct TestStatusRegister(u8) {
>> +            0:0       ready       as bool;
>> +            1:1       error       as bool;
>> +            3:2       state       as u8;
>> +            7:4       reserved    as u8;
>> +            7:0       full_byte   as u8;  // For entire register
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    #[test]
>> +    fn test_single_bits() {
>> +        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
>> +
>> +        assert!(!pte.present());
>> +        assert!(!pte.writable());
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
>> +
>> +        pte = pte.set_present(true);
>> +        assert!(pte.present());
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
>> +
>> +        pte = pte.set_writable(true);
>> +        assert!(pte.writable());
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3);
>> +
>> +        pte = pte.set_writable(false);
>> +        assert!(!pte.writable());
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
>> +
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0);
>> +        pte = pte.set_available(0x5);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x5);
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0xA01);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    #[test]
>> +    fn test_range_fields() {
>> +        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
>> +
>> +        pte = pte.set_pfn(0x123456);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0x123456);
>> +        // Test overlapping field reads same value
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), 0x123456);
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x123456000);
>> +
>> +        pte = pte.set_available(0x7);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x123456E00);
>> +
>> +        pte = pte.set_available2(0x3FF);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123456E00);
>> +
>> +        // Test TryFrom with ?=> for MemoryType
>> +        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Device);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123456E00);
>> +
>> +        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Normal);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Normal));
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123455E00);
>> +
>> +        // Test all valid values for mem_type
>> +        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
>> +        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0000123457E00);
>> +
>> +        // Test failure case using extended_type field which has 4 bits (0-15)
>> +        // MemoryType only handles 0-3, so values 4-15 should return Err
>> +        let mut raw = pte.into();
>> +        // Set bits 17:14 to 7 (invalid for MemoryType)
>> +        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(14..=17)) | (0x7 << 14);
>> +        let invalid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
>> +        // Should return Err with the invalid value
>> +        assert_eq!(invalid_pte.extended_type(), Err(0x7));
>> +
>> +        // Test a valid value after testing invalid to ensure both cases work
>> +        // Set bits 17:14 to 2 (valid: Device)
>> +        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(14..=17)) | (0x2 << 14);
>> +        let valid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
>> +        assert_eq!(valid_pte.extended_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
>> +
>> +        let max_pfn = ::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(0..=39);
>> +        pte = pte.set_pfn(max_pfn);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), max_pfn);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), max_pfn);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    #[test]
>> +    fn test_builder_pattern() {
>> +        let pte = TestPageTableEntry::default()
>> +            .set_present(true)
>> +            .set_writable(true)
>> +            .set_available(0x7)
>> +            .set_pfn(0xABCDEF)
>> +            .set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved)
>> +            .set_available2(0x3FF);
>> +
>> +        assert!(pte.present());
>> +        assert!(pte.writable());
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0xABCDEF);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.pfn_overlap(), 0xABCDEF);
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
>> +        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
> 
> Maybe check the raw value here as well, although I guess the previous
> test already covered this anyway.
> 
> With these points confirmed,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Thanks! I will resend just this patch as a reply-to this patch (hope that's Ok).

 - Joel
[PATCH v7] rust: bitfield: Add KUNIT tests for bitfield
Posted by Joel Fernandes 2 months, 1 week ago
Add KUNIT tests to make sure the macro is working correctly.

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
---
 rust/kernel/bitfield.rs | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 316 insertions(+)

diff --git a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
index 09cd5741598c..c3e0ef531256 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/bitfield.rs
@@ -329,3 +329,319 @@ fn default() -> Self {
         }
     };
 }
+
+#[::kernel::macros::kunit_tests(kernel_bitfield)]
+mod tests {
+    use core::convert::TryFrom;
+
+    // Enum types for testing => and ?=> conversions
+    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
+    enum MemoryType {
+        #[default]
+        Unmapped = 0,
+        Normal = 1,
+        Device = 2,
+        Reserved = 3,
+    }
+
+    impl TryFrom<u8> for MemoryType {
+        type Error = u8;
+        fn try_from(value: u8) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> {
+            match value {
+                0 => Ok(MemoryType::Unmapped),
+                1 => Ok(MemoryType::Normal),
+                2 => Ok(MemoryType::Device),
+                3 => Ok(MemoryType::Reserved),
+                _ => Err(value),
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    impl From<MemoryType> for u64 {
+        fn from(mt: MemoryType) -> u64 {
+            mt as u64
+        }
+    }
+
+    #[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
+    enum Priority {
+        #[default]
+        Low = 0,
+        Medium = 1,
+        High = 2,
+        Critical = 3,
+    }
+
+    impl From<u8> for Priority {
+        fn from(value: u8) -> Self {
+            match value & 0x3 {
+                0 => Priority::Low,
+                1 => Priority::Medium,
+                2 => Priority::High,
+                _ => Priority::Critical,
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    impl From<Priority> for u16 {
+        fn from(p: Priority) -> u16 {
+            p as u16
+        }
+    }
+
+    bitfield! {
+        struct TestPageTableEntry(u64) {
+            0:0       present     as bool;
+            1:1       writable    as bool;
+            11:9      available   as u8;
+            15:12     mem_type    as u8 ?=> MemoryType;
+            51:16     pfn         as u64;
+            61:52     available2  as u16;
+        }
+    }
+
+    bitfield! {
+        struct TestControlRegister(u16) {
+            0:0       enable      as bool;
+            3:1       mode        as u8;
+            5:4       priority    as u8 => Priority;
+            7:4       priority_nibble as u8;
+            15:8      channel     as u8;
+        }
+    }
+
+    bitfield! {
+        struct TestStatusRegister(u8) {
+            0:0       ready       as bool;
+            1:1       error       as bool;
+            3:2       state       as u8;
+            7:4       reserved    as u8;
+            7:0       full_byte   as u8;  // For entire register
+        }
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_single_bits() {
+        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
+
+        assert!(!pte.present());
+        assert!(!pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
+
+        pte = pte.set_present(true);
+        assert!(pte.present());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
+
+        pte = pte.set_writable(true);
+        assert!(pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3);
+
+        pte = pte.set_writable(false);
+        assert!(!pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1);
+
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0);
+        pte = pte.set_available(0x5);
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x5);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0xA01);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_range_fields() {
+        let mut pte = TestPageTableEntry::default();
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x0);
+
+        pte = pte.set_pfn(0x123456);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0x123456);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1234560000);
+
+        pte = pte.set_available(0x7);
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x1234560E00);
+
+        pte = pte.set_available2(0x3FF);
+        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0_0012_3456_0E00u64);
+
+        // Test TryFrom with ?=> for MemoryType
+        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Device);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0_0012_3456_2E00u64);
+
+        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Normal);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Normal));
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0_0012_3456_1E00u64);
+
+        // Test all valid values for mem_type
+        pte = pte.set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), 0x3FF0_0012_3456_3E00u64);
+
+        // Test failure case using mem_type field which has 4 bits (0-15)
+        // MemoryType only handles 0-3, so values 4-15 should return Err
+        let mut raw = pte.into();
+        // Set bits 15:12 to 7 (invalid for MemoryType)
+        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(12..=15)) | (0x7 << 12);
+        let invalid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
+        // Should return Err with the invalid value
+        assert_eq!(invalid_pte.mem_type(), Err(0x7));
+
+        // Test a valid value after testing invalid to ensure both cases work
+        // Set bits 15:12 to 2 (valid: Device)
+        raw = (raw & !::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(12..=15)) | (0x2 << 12);
+        let valid_pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw);
+        assert_eq!(valid_pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Device));
+
+        let max_pfn = ::kernel::bits::genmask_u64(0..=35);
+        pte = pte.set_pfn(max_pfn);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), max_pfn);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_builder_pattern() {
+        let pte = TestPageTableEntry::default()
+            .set_present(true)
+            .set_writable(true)
+            .set_available(0x7)
+            .set_pfn(0xABCDEF)
+            .set_mem_type(MemoryType::Reserved)
+            .set_available2(0x3FF);
+
+        assert!(pte.present());
+        assert!(pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0xABCDEF);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
+        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_raw_operations() {
+        let raw_value = 0x3FF0000031233E03u64;
+
+        let pte = TestPageTableEntry(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte), raw_value);
+
+        assert!(pte.present());
+        assert!(pte.writable());
+        assert_eq!(pte.available(), 0x7);
+        assert_eq!(pte.pfn(), 0x3123);
+        assert_eq!(pte.mem_type(), Ok(MemoryType::Reserved));
+        assert_eq!(pte.available2(), 0x3FF);
+
+        // Test using direct constructor syntax TestStruct(value)
+        let pte2 = TestPageTableEntry(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u64::from(pte2), raw_value);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_u16_bitfield() {
+        let mut ctrl = TestControlRegister::default();
+
+        assert!(!ctrl.enable());
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.mode(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority(), Priority::Low);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority_nibble(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.channel(), 0);
+
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_enable(true);
+        assert!(ctrl.enable());
+
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_mode(0x5);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.mode(), 0x5);
+
+        // Test From conversion with =>
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_priority(Priority::High);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority(), Priority::High);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority_nibble(), 0x2); // High = 2 in bits 5:4
+
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_channel(0xAB);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.channel(), 0xAB);
+
+        // Test overlapping fields
+        ctrl = ctrl.set_priority_nibble(0xF);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority_nibble(), 0xF);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl.priority(), Priority::Critical); // bits 5:4 = 0x3
+
+        let ctrl2 = TestControlRegister::default()
+            .set_enable(true)
+            .set_mode(0x3)
+            .set_priority(Priority::Medium)
+            .set_channel(0x42);
+
+        assert!(ctrl2.enable());
+        assert_eq!(ctrl2.mode(), 0x3);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl2.priority(), Priority::Medium);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl2.channel(), 0x42);
+
+        let raw_value: u16 = 0x4217;
+        let ctrl3 = TestControlRegister(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u16::from(ctrl3), raw_value);
+        assert!(ctrl3.enable());
+        assert_eq!(ctrl3.priority(), Priority::Medium);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl3.priority_nibble(), 0x1);
+        assert_eq!(ctrl3.channel(), 0x42);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn test_u8_bitfield() {
+        let mut status = TestStatusRegister::default();
+
+        assert!(!status.ready());
+        assert!(!status.error());
+        assert_eq!(status.state(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(status.reserved(), 0);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0);
+
+        status = status.set_ready(true);
+        assert!(status.ready());
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x01);
+
+        status = status.set_error(true);
+        assert!(status.error());
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x03);
+
+        status = status.set_state(0x3);
+        assert_eq!(status.state(), 0x3);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x0F);
+
+        status = status.set_reserved(0xA);
+        assert_eq!(status.reserved(), 0xA);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0xAF);
+
+        // Test overlapping field
+        status = status.set_full_byte(0x55);
+        assert_eq!(status.full_byte(), 0x55);
+        assert!(status.ready());
+        assert!(!status.error());
+        assert_eq!(status.state(), 0x1);
+        assert_eq!(status.reserved(), 0x5);
+
+        let status2 = TestStatusRegister::default()
+            .set_ready(true)
+            .set_state(0x2)
+            .set_reserved(0x5);
+
+        assert!(status2.ready());
+        assert!(!status2.error());
+        assert_eq!(status2.state(), 0x2);
+        assert_eq!(status2.reserved(), 0x5);
+        assert_eq!(status2.full_byte(), 0x59);
+
+        let raw_value: u8 = 0x59;
+        let status3 = TestStatusRegister(raw_value);
+        assert_eq!(u8::from(status3), raw_value);
+        assert!(status3.ready());
+        assert!(!status3.error());
+        assert_eq!(status3.state(), 0x2);
+        assert_eq!(status3.reserved(), 0x5);
+        assert_eq!(status3.full_byte(), 0x59);
+
+        let status4 = TestStatusRegister(0xFF);
+        assert!(status4.ready());
+        assert!(status4.error());
+        assert_eq!(status4.state(), 0x3);
+        assert_eq!(status4.reserved(), 0xF);
+        assert_eq!(status4.full_byte(), 0xFF);
+    }
+}
-- 
2.34.1