drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adapter.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
When ice_adapter_new() fails, the reserved XArray entry created by
xa_insert() is not released. This causes subsequent insertions at
the same index to return -EBUSY, potentially leading to
NULL pointer dereferences.
Reorder the operations as suggested by Przemek Kitszel:
1. Check if adapter already exists (xa_load)
2. Reserve the XArray slot (xa_reserve)
3. Allocate the adapter (ice_adapter_new)
4. Store the adapter (xa_store)
Fixes: 0f0023c649c7 ("ice: do not init struct ice_adapter more times than needed")
Suggested-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
---
Changes in v3:
- Reorder xa_load/xa_reserve/ice_adapter_new/xa_store calls as
suggested by Przemek Kitszel, instead of just adding xa_release().
Changes in v2:
- Instead of checking the return value of xa_store(), fix the real bug
where a failed ice_adapter_new() would leave a stale entry in the
XArray.
- Use xa_release() to clean up the reserved entry, as suggested by
Jacob Keller.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adapter.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adapter.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adapter.c
index b53561c34708..0a8a48cd4bce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adapter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adapter.c
@@ -99,19 +99,21 @@ struct ice_adapter *ice_adapter_get(struct pci_dev *pdev)
index = ice_adapter_xa_index(pdev);
scoped_guard(mutex, &ice_adapters_mutex) {
- err = xa_insert(&ice_adapters, index, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (err == -EBUSY) {
- adapter = xa_load(&ice_adapters, index);
+ adapter = xa_load(&ice_adapters, index);
+ if (adapter) {
refcount_inc(&adapter->refcount);
WARN_ON_ONCE(adapter->index != ice_adapter_index(pdev));
return adapter;
}
+ err = xa_reserve(&ice_adapters, index, GFP_KERNEL);
if (err)
return ERR_PTR(err);
adapter = ice_adapter_new(pdev);
- if (!adapter)
+ if (!adapter) {
+ xa_release(&ice_adapters, index);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
xa_store(&ice_adapters, index, adapter, GFP_KERNEL);
}
return adapter;
--
2.50.1.windows.1
> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf > Of Haotian Zhang > Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2025 1:54 PM > To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L > <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw > <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>; David S . Miller > <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub > Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; intel- > wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn> > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3] ice: ice_adapter: release xa > entry on adapter allocation failure > > When ice_adapter_new() fails, the reserved XArray entry created by > xa_insert() is not released. This causes subsequent insertions at > the same index to return -EBUSY, potentially leading to > NULL pointer dereferences. > > Reorder the operations as suggested by Przemek Kitszel: > 1. Check if adapter already exists (xa_load) > 2. Reserve the XArray slot (xa_reserve) > 3. Allocate the adapter (ice_adapter_new) > 4. Store the adapter (xa_store) > > Fixes: 0f0023c649c7 ("ice: do not init struct ice_adapter more times > than needed") > Suggested-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > Suggested-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> > > --- > Changes in v3: > - Reorder xa_load/xa_reserve/ice_adapter_new/xa_store calls as > suggested by Przemek Kitszel, instead of just adding xa_release(). > Changes in v2: > - Instead of checking the return value of xa_store(), fix the real > bug > where a failed ice_adapter_new() would leave a stale entry in the > XArray. > - Use xa_release() to clean up the reserved entry, as suggested by > Jacob Keller. > --- ... > -- > 2.50.1.windows.1
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.