kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries
similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's
callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also
add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Change list:
v1 -> v2:
From Alexei
- create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain
similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
};
+struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
+ u64 nr;
+ u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
+};
+
+#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT],
+ bpf_perf_callchain_entries);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+
+static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry,
+ struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel,
+ bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack,
+ bool add_mark)
+{
+ struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry;
+ struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry;
+ int preempt_cnt;
+
+ preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) {
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]);
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack,
+ crosstack, add_mark);
+ if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) {
+ preempt_enable();
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1));
+ *entry = bpf_entry;
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0))
+ return;
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+}
+
static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
{
return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
@@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
- struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
+ struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace;
bool kernel = !user;
+ int err;
if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
@@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
- trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
- false, false);
+ err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
+ false, false);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- if (unlikely(!trace))
- /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
- return -EFAULT;
+ err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags);
+ bpf_put_perf_callchain();
- return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
+ return err;
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
@@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
- if (may_fault)
- rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
+ preempt_disable();
if (trace_in)
trace = trace_in;
@@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
crosstask, false);
if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
- if (may_fault)
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ preempt_enable();
goto err_fault;
}
@@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
} else {
memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len);
}
-
- /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */
- if (may_fault)
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ preempt_enable();
if (user_build_id)
stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
--
2.48.1
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:40 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote: > > As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused > if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable > mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries > similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's > callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also > add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain. > > Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com > Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> > --- > kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > Change list: > v1 -> v2: > From Alexei > - create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain > similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers. > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c > index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c > @@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map { > struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets); > }; > > +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry { > + u64 nr; > + u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH]; > +}; > + > +#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3 > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT], > + bpf_perf_callchain_entries); > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); > + > +static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry, > + struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, > + bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack, > + bool add_mark) > +{ > + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry; > + struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry; > + int preempt_cnt; > + > + preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) { > + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); > + return -EBUSY; > + } > + > + bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]); > + > + preempt_disable(); > + perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack, > + crosstack, add_mark); > + if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) { > + preempt_enable(); > + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); > + return -EFAULT; > + } > + memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1)); N copies of a stack trace is not good enough, let's have N + 1 now :) If we are going with our own buffers, we need to teach get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer directly to avoid that unnecessary copy. Also, I know it's about 1KB, but it would be so simple and efficient to just have this bpf_perf_callchain_entry on the stack. Kernel has a 16KB stack, right? It feels like for something like this using 1KB of the stack to simplify and speed up stack trace capture is a good enough reason. > + *entry = bpf_entry; > + preempt_enable(); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void) > +{ > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0)) > + return; > + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); > +} > + > static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map) > { > return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID); > @@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map, > u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map); > u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK; > bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK; > - struct perf_callchain_entry *trace; > + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace; > bool kernel = !user; > + int err; > > if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK | > BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID))) > @@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map, > if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack) > max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack; > > - trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth, > - false, false); > + err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth, > + false, false); > + if (err) > + return err; > > - if (unlikely(!trace)) > - /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */ > - return -EFAULT; > + err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags); > + bpf_put_perf_callchain(); > > - return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags); > + return err; > } > > const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = { > @@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, > if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth) > max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack; > > - if (may_fault) > - rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */ > + preempt_disable(); > > if (trace_in) > trace = trace_in; > @@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, > crosstask, false); > > if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) { > - if (may_fault) > - rcu_read_unlock(); > + preempt_enable(); > goto err_fault; > } > > @@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, > } else { > memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len); > } > - > - /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */ > - if (may_fault) > - rcu_read_unlock(); > + preempt_enable(); > > if (user_build_id) > stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault); really it's just build_id resolution that can take a while, which is why we are trying to avoid preemption around it. But for non-build_id case, can we avoid extra copying? > -- > 2.48.1 >
在 2025/9/27 02:52, Andrii Nakryiko 写道: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:40 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote: >> >> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused >> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable >> mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries >> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's >> callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also >> add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain. >> >> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com >> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> >> --- >> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> Change list: >> v1 -> v2: >> From Alexei >> - create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain >> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers. >> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev >> >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c >> index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644 >> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c >> @@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map { >> struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets); >> }; >> >> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry { >> + u64 nr; >> + u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH]; >> +}; >> + >> +#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3 >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT], >> + bpf_perf_callchain_entries); >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + >> +static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry, >> + struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, >> + bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack, >> + bool add_mark) >> +{ >> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry; >> + struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry; >> + int preempt_cnt; >> + >> + preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) { >> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + return -EBUSY; >> + } >> + >> + bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]); >> + >> + preempt_disable(); >> + perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack, >> + crosstack, add_mark); >> + if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) { >> + preempt_enable(); >> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + return -EFAULT; >> + } >> + memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1)); > > N copies of a stack trace is not good enough, let's have N + 1 now :) > > If we are going with our own buffers, we need to teach > get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer directly to avoid that > unnecessary copy. > > Also, I know it's about 1KB, but it would be so simple and efficient > to just have this bpf_perf_callchain_entry on the stack. Kernel has a > 16KB stack, right? It feels like for something like this using 1KB of > the stack to simplify and speed up stack trace capture is a good > enough reason. > >> + *entry = bpf_entry; >> + preempt_enable(); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void) >> +{ >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0)) >> + return; >> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> +} >> + >> static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map) >> { >> return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID); >> @@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map, >> u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map); >> u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK; >> bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK; >> - struct perf_callchain_entry *trace; >> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace; >> bool kernel = !user; >> + int err; >> >> if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK | >> BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID))) >> @@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map, >> if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack) >> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack; >> >> - trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth, >> - false, false); >> + err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth, >> + false, false); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> >> - if (unlikely(!trace)) >> - /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */ >> - return -EFAULT; >> + err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags); >> + bpf_put_perf_callchain(); >> >> - return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags); >> + return err; >> } >> >> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = { >> @@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, >> if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth) >> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack; >> >> - if (may_fault) >> - rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */ >> + preempt_disable(); >> >> if (trace_in) >> trace = trace_in; >> @@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, >> crosstask, false); >> >> if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) { >> - if (may_fault) >> - rcu_read_unlock(); >> + preempt_enable(); >> goto err_fault; >> } >> >> @@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, >> } else { >> memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len); >> } >> - >> - /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */ >> - if (may_fault) >> - rcu_read_unlock(); >> + preempt_enable(); >> >> if (user_build_id) >> stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault); > > really it's just build_id resolution that can take a while, which is > why we are trying to avoid preemption around it. But for non-build_id > case, can we avoid extra copying? > Maybe possible, you mean optimize the memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len) for non-build_id? I'm trying to add an external entry in get_perf_callchain to see if the perf maintainers agree. If it's approved, everything seems manageable. >> -- >> 2.48.1 >> -- Best Regards Tao Chen
在 2025/9/27 02:52, Andrii Nakryiko 写道: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:40 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote: >> >> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused >> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable >> mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries >> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's >> callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also >> add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain. >> >> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com >> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> >> --- >> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> Change list: >> v1 -> v2: >> From Alexei >> - create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain >> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers. >> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev >> >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c >> index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644 >> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c >> @@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map { >> struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets); >> }; >> >> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry { >> + u64 nr; >> + u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH]; >> +}; >> + >> +#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3 >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT], >> + bpf_perf_callchain_entries); >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + >> +static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry, >> + struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, >> + bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack, >> + bool add_mark) >> +{ >> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry; >> + struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry; >> + int preempt_cnt; >> + >> + preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) { >> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + return -EBUSY; >> + } >> + >> + bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]); >> + >> + preempt_disable(); >> + perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack, >> + crosstack, add_mark); >> + if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) { >> + preempt_enable(); >> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> + return -EFAULT; >> + } >> + memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1)); > > N copies of a stack trace is not good enough, let's have N + 1 now :) > > If we are going with our own buffers, we need to teach > get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer directly to avoid that > unnecessary copy. > > Also, I know it's about 1KB, but it would be so simple and efficient > to just have this bpf_perf_callchain_entry on the stack. Kernel has a > 16KB stack, right? It feels like for something like this using 1KB of > the stack to simplify and speed up stack trace capture is a good > enough reason. > It's a good idea, if that's the case, do we also not need preempt_disable for get_perf_callchain? >> + *entry = bpf_entry; >> + preempt_enable(); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void) >> +{ >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0)) >> + return; >> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt); >> +} >> + >> static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map) >> { >> return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID); >> @@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map, >> u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map); >> u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK; >> bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK; >> - struct perf_callchain_entry *trace; >> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace; >> bool kernel = !user; >> + int err; >> >> if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK | >> BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID))) >> @@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map, >> if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack) >> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack; >> >> - trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth, >> - false, false); >> + err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth, >> + false, false); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> >> - if (unlikely(!trace)) >> - /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */ >> - return -EFAULT; >> + err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags); >> + bpf_put_perf_callchain(); >> >> - return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags); >> + return err; >> } >> >> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = { >> @@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, >> if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth) >> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack; >> >> - if (may_fault) >> - rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */ >> + preempt_disable(); >> >> if (trace_in) >> trace = trace_in; >> @@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, >> crosstask, false); >> >> if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) { >> - if (may_fault) >> - rcu_read_unlock(); >> + preempt_enable(); >> goto err_fault; >> } >> >> @@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task, >> } else { >> memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len); >> } >> - >> - /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */ >> - if (may_fault) >> - rcu_read_unlock(); >> + preempt_enable(); >> >> if (user_build_id) >> stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault); > > really it's just build_id resolution that can take a while, which is > why we are trying to avoid preemption around it. But for non-build_id > case, can we avoid extra copying? > >> -- >> 2.48.1 >> -- Best Regards Tao Chen
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.