kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries
similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's
callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also
add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Change list:
v1 -> v2:
From Alexei
- create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain
similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
};
+struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
+ u64 nr;
+ u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
+};
+
+#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT],
+ bpf_perf_callchain_entries);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+
+static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry,
+ struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel,
+ bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack,
+ bool add_mark)
+{
+ struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry;
+ struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry;
+ int preempt_cnt;
+
+ preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) {
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]);
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack,
+ crosstack, add_mark);
+ if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) {
+ preempt_enable();
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1));
+ *entry = bpf_entry;
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0))
+ return;
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
+}
+
static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
{
return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
@@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
- struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
+ struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace;
bool kernel = !user;
+ int err;
if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
@@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
- trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
- false, false);
+ err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
+ false, false);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- if (unlikely(!trace))
- /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
- return -EFAULT;
+ err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags);
+ bpf_put_perf_callchain();
- return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
+ return err;
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
@@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
- if (may_fault)
- rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
+ preempt_disable();
if (trace_in)
trace = trace_in;
@@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
crosstask, false);
if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
- if (may_fault)
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ preempt_enable();
goto err_fault;
}
@@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
} else {
memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len);
}
-
- /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */
- if (may_fault)
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ preempt_enable();
if (user_build_id)
stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
--
2.48.1
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:40 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
> mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries
> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's
> callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also
> add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain.
>
> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> Change list:
> v1 -> v2:
> From Alexei
> - create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain
> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
> struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
> };
>
> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
> + u64 nr;
> + u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
> +};
> +
> +#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT],
> + bpf_perf_callchain_entries);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
> +
> +static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry,
> + struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel,
> + bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack,
> + bool add_mark)
> +{
> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry;
> + struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry;
> + int preempt_cnt;
> +
> + preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) {
> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]);
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack,
> + crosstack, add_mark);
> + if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) {
> + preempt_enable();
> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1));
N copies of a stack trace is not good enough, let's have N + 1 now :)
If we are going with our own buffers, we need to teach
get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer directly to avoid that
unnecessary copy.
Also, I know it's about 1KB, but it would be so simple and efficient
to just have this bpf_perf_callchain_entry on the stack. Kernel has a
16KB stack, right? It feels like for something like this using 1KB of
the stack to simplify and speed up stack trace capture is a good
enough reason.
> + *entry = bpf_entry;
> + preempt_enable();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0))
> + return;
> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
> +}
> +
> static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> {
> return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
> @@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
> u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
> u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
> bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
> - struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> bool kernel = !user;
> + int err;
>
> if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
> BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
> @@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
> if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>
> - trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
> - false, false);
> + err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
> + false, false);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
>
> - if (unlikely(!trace))
> - /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
> - return -EFAULT;
> + err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags);
> + bpf_put_perf_callchain();
>
> - return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
> + return err;
> }
>
> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
> @@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
> if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>
> - if (may_fault)
> - rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
> + preempt_disable();
>
> if (trace_in)
> trace = trace_in;
> @@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
> crosstask, false);
>
> if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
> - if (may_fault)
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + preempt_enable();
> goto err_fault;
> }
>
> @@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
> } else {
> memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len);
> }
> -
> - /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */
> - if (may_fault)
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + preempt_enable();
>
> if (user_build_id)
> stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
really it's just build_id resolution that can take a while, which is
why we are trying to avoid preemption around it. But for non-build_id
case, can we avoid extra copying?
> --
> 2.48.1
>
在 2025/9/27 02:52, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:40 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
>> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
>> mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries
>> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's
>> callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also
>> add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain.
>>
>> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> Change list:
>> v1 -> v2:
>> From Alexei
>> - create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain
>> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers.
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
>> struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
>> };
>>
>> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
>> + u64 nr;
>> + u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT],
>> + bpf_perf_callchain_entries);
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> +
>> +static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry,
>> + struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel,
>> + bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack,
>> + bool add_mark)
>> +{
>> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry;
>> + struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry;
>> + int preempt_cnt;
>> +
>> + preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) {
>> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]);
>> +
>> + preempt_disable();
>> + perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack,
>> + crosstack, add_mark);
>> + if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) {
>> + preempt_enable();
>> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + }
>> + memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1));
>
> N copies of a stack trace is not good enough, let's have N + 1 now :)
>
> If we are going with our own buffers, we need to teach
> get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer directly to avoid that
> unnecessary copy.
>
> Also, I know it's about 1KB, but it would be so simple and efficient
> to just have this bpf_perf_callchain_entry on the stack. Kernel has a
> 16KB stack, right? It feels like for something like this using 1KB of
> the stack to simplify and speed up stack trace capture is a good
> enough reason.
>
>> + *entry = bpf_entry;
>> + preempt_enable();
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0))
>> + return;
>> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
>> {
>> return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
>> @@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>> u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
>> u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
>> bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
>> - struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>> bool kernel = !user;
>> + int err;
>>
>> if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
>> BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
>> @@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>> if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
>> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>>
>> - trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
>> - false, false);
>> + err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
>> + false, false);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>>
>> - if (unlikely(!trace))
>> - /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
>> - return -EFAULT;
>> + err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags);
>> + bpf_put_perf_callchain();
>>
>> - return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
>> @@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>> if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
>> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>>
>> - if (may_fault)
>> - rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
>> + preempt_disable();
>>
>> if (trace_in)
>> trace = trace_in;
>> @@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>> crosstask, false);
>>
>> if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
>> - if (may_fault)
>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>> + preempt_enable();
>> goto err_fault;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>> } else {
>> memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len);
>> }
>> -
>> - /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */
>> - if (may_fault)
>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>> + preempt_enable();
>>
>> if (user_build_id)
>> stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
>
> really it's just build_id resolution that can take a while, which is
> why we are trying to avoid preemption around it. But for non-build_id
> case, can we avoid extra copying?
>
Maybe possible, you mean optimize the memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len) for
non-build_id? I'm trying to add an external entry in get_perf_callchain
to see if the perf maintainers agree. If it's approved, everything seems
manageable.
>> --
>> 2.48.1
>>
--
Best Regards
Tao Chen
在 2025/9/27 02:52, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:40 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
>> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
>> mode. We therefore use bpf_perf_callchain_entries percpu entries
>> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers to preserve the current task's
>> callchain and prevent overwriting by preempting tasks. And we also
>> add preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain.
>>
>> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> Change list:
>> v1 -> v2:
>> From Alexei
>> - create percpu entris to preserve current task's callchain
>> similarly to bpf_try_get_buffers.
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250922075333.1452803-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> index 2e182a3ac4c..8788c219926 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ struct bpf_stack_map {
>> struct stack_map_bucket *buckets[] __counted_by(n_buckets);
>> };
>>
>> +struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry {
>> + u64 nr;
>> + u64 ip[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT 3
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry[MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT],
>> + bpf_perf_callchain_entries);
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> +
>> +static int bpf_get_perf_callchain(struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry **entry,
>> + struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel,
>> + bool user, u32 max_stack, bool crosstack,
>> + bool add_mark)
>> +{
>> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *bpf_entry;
>> + struct perf_callchain_entry *perf_entry;
>> + int preempt_cnt;
>> +
>> + preempt_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_cnt > MAX_PERF_CALLCHAIN_PREEMPT)) {
>> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bpf_entry = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_callchain_entries[preempt_cnt - 1]);
>> +
>> + preempt_disable();
>> + perf_entry = get_perf_callchain(regs, init_nr, kernel, user, max_stack,
>> + crosstack, add_mark);
>> + if (unlikely(!perf_entry)) {
>> + preempt_enable();
>> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + }
>> + memcpy(bpf_entry, perf_entry, sizeof(u64) * (perf_entry->nr + 1));
>
> N copies of a stack trace is not good enough, let's have N + 1 now :)
>
> If we are going with our own buffers, we need to teach
> get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer directly to avoid that
> unnecessary copy.
>
> Also, I know it's about 1KB, but it would be so simple and efficient
> to just have this bpf_perf_callchain_entry on the stack. Kernel has a
> 16KB stack, right? It feels like for something like this using 1KB of
> the stack to simplify and speed up stack trace capture is a good
> enough reason.
>
It's a good idea, if that's the case, do we also not need
preempt_disable for get_perf_callchain?
>> + *entry = bpf_entry;
>> + preempt_enable();
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(void)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt) == 0))
>> + return;
>> + this_cpu_dec(bpf_perf_callchain_preempt_cnt);
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool stack_map_use_build_id(struct bpf_map *map)
>> {
>> return (map->map_flags & BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID);
>> @@ -303,8 +352,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>> u32 max_depth = map->value_size / stack_map_data_size(map);
>> u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
>> bool user = flags & BPF_F_USER_STACK;
>> - struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>> + struct bpf_perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>> bool kernel = !user;
>> + int err;
>>
>> if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
>> BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
>> @@ -314,14 +364,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>> if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
>> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>>
>> - trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
>> - false, false);
>> + err = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&trace, regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
>> + false, false);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>>
>> - if (unlikely(!trace))
>> - /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
>> - return -EFAULT;
>> + err = __bpf_get_stackid(map, (struct perf_callchain_entry *)trace, flags);
>> + bpf_put_perf_callchain();
>>
>> - return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
>> @@ -443,8 +494,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>> if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
>> max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>>
>> - if (may_fault)
>> - rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
>> + preempt_disable();
>>
>> if (trace_in)
>> trace = trace_in;
>> @@ -455,8 +505,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>> crosstask, false);
>>
>> if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
>> - if (may_fault)
>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>> + preempt_enable();
>> goto err_fault;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -474,10 +523,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>> } else {
>> memcpy(buf, ips, copy_len);
>> }
>> -
>> - /* trace/ips should not be dereferenced after this point */
>> - if (may_fault)
>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>> + preempt_enable();
>>
>> if (user_build_id)
>> stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
>
> really it's just build_id resolution that can take a while, which is
> why we are trying to avoid preemption around it. But for non-build_id
> case, can we avoid extra copying?
>
>> --
>> 2.48.1
>>
--
Best Regards
Tao Chen
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.