include/linux/of.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
1fcc67e3a354 ("of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix()") added
of_get_next_child_with_prefix() but did not add a stub for the !CONFIG_OF
case.
Add a of_get_next_child_with_prefix() stub so users of
for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() can be built for compile testing even
when !CONFIG_OF.
Fixes: 1fcc67e3a354 ("of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix()")
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
include/linux/of.h | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index a62154aeda1b..5e2c6ed9370a 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -550,6 +550,13 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(
return NULL;
}
+static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child_with_prefix(
+ const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev,
+ const char *prefix)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
{
--
2.43.0
Il 25/09/25 21:56, Bjorn Helgaas ha scritto:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> 1fcc67e3a354 ("of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix()") added
> of_get_next_child_with_prefix() but did not add a stub for the !CONFIG_OF
> case.
>
> Add a of_get_next_child_with_prefix() stub so users of
> for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() can be built for compile testing even
> when !CONFIG_OF.
>
> Fixes: 1fcc67e3a354 ("of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix()")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index a62154aeda1b..5e2c6ed9370a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -550,6 +550,13 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child_with_prefix(
> + const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev,
> + const char *prefix)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
> const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
> {
On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:56:30 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> 1fcc67e3a354 ("of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix()") added
> of_get_next_child_with_prefix() but did not add a stub for the !CONFIG_OF
> case.
>
> Add a of_get_next_child_with_prefix() stub so users of
> for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() can be built for compile testing even
> when !CONFIG_OF.
>
> Fixes: 1fcc67e3a354 ("of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix()")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
Applied, thanks!
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.