On 2025-09-24 16:20:50+0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> From: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
>
> There is no errno variable when NOLIBC_IGNORE_ERRNO is defined. As such,
> simply print the message with "unknown error" rather than the integer
> value of errno.
>
> Fixes: acab7bcdb1bc ("tools/nolibc/stdio: add perror() to report the errno value")
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
>
> ---
> v3:
> - Change the message instead of removing perror entirely
> ---
> tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> index 7630234408c5..724d05ce6962 100644
> --- a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h
> @@ -600,7 +600,11 @@ int sscanf(const char *str, const char *format, ...)
> static __attribute__((unused))
> void perror(const char *msg)
> {
> +#ifdef NOLIBC_IGNORE_ERRNO
> + fprintf(stderr, "%s%sunknown error\n", (msg && *msg) ? msg : "", (msg && *msg) ? ": " : "");
> +#else
> fprintf(stderr, "%s%serrno=%d\n", (msg && *msg) ? msg : "", (msg && *msg) ? ": " : "", errno);
> +#endif
> }
>
> static __attribute__((unused))
> --
> 2.51.0
>