This series adds support for the latest (B2) revision of cs35l56.

Most of the code is in ASoC, but there are some trivial changes
needed to the HDA drivers. They are to prevent build breaks so
they have been included in the ASoC patch.

Richard Fitzgerald (2):
  ASoC: cs35l56: Set fw_regs table after getting REVID
  ASoC: cs35l56: Add support for CS35L56 B2 silicon

 include/sound/cs35l56.h                       |  5 +-
 sound/hda/codecs/side-codecs/cs35l56_hda.c    |  1 +
 .../hda/codecs/side-codecs/cs35l56_hda_i2c.c  |  2 -
 .../hda/codecs/side-codecs/cs35l56_hda_spi.c  |  2 -
 sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-i2c.c                |  4 +-
 sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-sdw.c                |  4 +-
 sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-shared.c             | 97 +++++++++++++------
 sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-spi.c                |  2 +-
 8 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.5

On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 15:03:24 +0200,
Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> 
> This series adds support for the latest (B2) revision of cs35l56.
> 
> Most of the code is in ASoC, but there are some trivial changes
> needed to the HDA drivers. They are to prevent build breaks so
> they have been included in the ASoC patch.
> 
> Richard Fitzgerald (2):
>   ASoC: cs35l56: Set fw_regs table after getting REVID
>   ASoC: cs35l56: Add support for CS35L56 B2 silicon

Mark, shall I apply those patches to my tree?
They seem cleanly applicable.


thanks,

Takashi

On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 09:58:45 +0200,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 15:03:24 +0200,
> Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > 
> > This series adds support for the latest (B2) revision of cs35l56.
> > 
> > Most of the code is in ASoC, but there are some trivial changes
> > needed to the HDA drivers. They are to prevent build breaks so
> > they have been included in the ASoC patch.
> > 
> > Richard Fitzgerald (2):
> >   ASoC: cs35l56: Set fw_regs table after getting REVID
> >   ASoC: cs35l56: Add support for CS35L56 B2 silicon
> 
> Mark, shall I apply those patches to my tree?
> They seem cleanly applicable.

Assuming that they didn't get merged in ASoC tree, I picked up them
now.  Both applied to for-next branch.


thanks,

Takashi