From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
The 'isolcpus' parameter specified at boot time can be assigned to an
isolated partition. While it is valid put the 'isolcpus' in an isolated
partition, attempting to change a member cpuset to an isolated partition
will fail if the cpuset contains any 'isolcpus'.
For example, the system boots with 'isolcpus=9', and the following
configuration works correctly:
# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
# mkdir test
# echo 1 > test/cpuset.cpus
# echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
# cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
isolated
# echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
# cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
isolated
# cat test/cpuset.cpus
9
However, the following steps to convert a member cpuset to an isolated
partition will fail:
# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
# mkdir test
# echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
# echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
# cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
isolated invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
The issue occurs because the new partition state (new_prs) is used for
validation against housekeeping constraints before it has been properly
updated. To resolve this, move the assignment of new_prs before the
housekeeping validation check when enabling a root partition.
Fixes: 11e5f407b64a ("cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions")
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 44231cb1d83f..2b7e2f17577e 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1806,6 +1806,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
xcpus = tmp->delmask;
if (compute_excpus(cs, xcpus))
WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_empty(cs->exclusive_cpus));
+ new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
/*
* Enabling partition root is not allowed if its
@@ -1838,7 +1839,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
deleting = true;
subparts_delta++;
- new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
} else if (cmd == partcmd_disable) {
/*
* May need to add cpus back to parent's effective_cpus
--
2.34.1
On 9/18/25 8:25 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> The 'isolcpus' parameter specified at boot time can be assigned to an
> isolated partition. While it is valid put the 'isolcpus' in an isolated
> partition, attempting to change a member cpuset to an isolated partition
> will fail if the cpuset contains any 'isolcpus'.
>
> For example, the system boots with 'isolcpus=9', and the following
> configuration works correctly:
>
> # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
> # mkdir test
> # echo 1 > test/cpuset.cpus
> # echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
> # cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
> isolated
> # echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
> # cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
> isolated
> # cat test/cpuset.cpus
> 9
>
> However, the following steps to convert a member cpuset to an isolated
> partition will fail:
>
> # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
> # mkdir test
> # echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
> # echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
> # cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
> isolated invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
>
> The issue occurs because the new partition state (new_prs) is used for
> validation against housekeeping constraints before it has been properly
> updated. To resolve this, move the assignment of new_prs before the
> housekeeping validation check when enabling a root partition.
>
> Fixes: 11e5f407b64a ("cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Thanks for finding the bug. However, I think the commit to be fixed
should be 4a74e418881f ("cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with
housekeeping setup"), not the one you listed above.
Cheers,
Longman
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 44231cb1d83f..2b7e2f17577e 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1806,6 +1806,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> xcpus = tmp->delmask;
> if (compute_excpus(cs, xcpus))
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_empty(cs->exclusive_cpus));
> + new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
>
> /*
> * Enabling partition root is not allowed if its
> @@ -1838,7 +1839,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
>
> deleting = true;
> subparts_delta++;
> - new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
> } else if (cmd == partcmd_disable) {
> /*
> * May need to add cpus back to parent's effective_cpus
On 2025/9/19 2:02, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 9/18/25 8:25 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
>> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>>
>> The 'isolcpus' parameter specified at boot time can be assigned to an
>> isolated partition. While it is valid put the 'isolcpus' in an isolated
>> partition, attempting to change a member cpuset to an isolated partition
>> will fail if the cpuset contains any 'isolcpus'.
>>
>> For example, the system boots with 'isolcpus=9', and the following
>> configuration works correctly:
>>
>> # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
>> # mkdir test
>> # echo 1 > test/cpuset.cpus
>> # echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
>> # cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
>> isolated
>> # echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
>> # cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
>> isolated
>> # cat test/cpuset.cpus
>> 9
>>
>> However, the following steps to convert a member cpuset to an isolated
>> partition will fail:
>>
>> # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
>> # mkdir test
>> # echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
>> # echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
>> # cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
>> isolated invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
>>
>> The issue occurs because the new partition state (new_prs) is used for
>> validation against housekeeping constraints before it has been properly
>> updated. To resolve this, move the assignment of new_prs before the
>> housekeeping validation check when enabling a root partition.
>>
>> Fixes: 11e5f407b64a ("cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions")
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> Thanks for finding the bug. However, I think the commit to be fixed should be 4a74e418881f
> ("cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup"), not the one you listed above.
>
Thank you for the correction, Longman, you are right. I'll update the commit ID with the correct one
--
Best regards,
Ridong
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.