Add description for the Svrsw60t59b extension (PTE Reserved for SW
bits 60:59) extension which was ratified recently in
riscv-non-isa/riscv-iommu.

Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
index ede6a58ccf53..7e1a59c7d911 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
@@ -217,6 +217,12 @@ properties:
             memory types as ratified in the 20191213 version of the privileged
             ISA specification.
 
+        - const: svrsw60t59b
+          description:
+            The svrsw60t59b for providing two more bits[60:59] to PTE/PMD entry
+            as ratified at commit 28bde925e7a7 ("PTE Reserved for SW bits 60:59")
+            of riscv-non-isa/riscv-iommu.
+
         - const: svvptc
           description:
             The standard Svvptc supervisor-level extension for
-- 
2.34.1

On 17/09/2025 12:37, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> Add description for the Svrsw60t59b extension (PTE Reserved for SW
> bits 60:59) extension which was ratified recently in
> riscv-non-isa/riscv-iommu.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhangchunyan@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof