When compiling with LLVM and CONFIG_LTO_CLANG is set, there exist the
following objtool warnings:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x0: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x18: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x38: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x3c: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x40: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x44: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x54: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x58: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x6c: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x84: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x94: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x9c: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xc4: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xf8: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xfc: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x104: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x10c: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x11c: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x120: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x124: unreachable instruction
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x144: unreachable instruction
All of the above instructions are in arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S,
and there is "OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_head.o := y" in Makefile
to skip objtool checking for head.o, but OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD
does not work for link time validation of vmlinux.o according to
tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt.
After many discussions, it is not proper to ignore .head.text section
in objtool or put them from text section to data section, so just give
a unwind hint to fix the above warnings.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250814083651.GR4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAAhV-H6A_swQmqpWHp6ryAEvc96CAMOMd2ZGyJEVNMsJfLkz6w@mail.gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Suggested-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
---
arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
index e3865e92a917..6ce999586757 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
__HEAD
_head:
+ UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
.word IMAGE_DOS_SIGNATURE /* "MZ", MS-DOS header */
.org 0x8
.dword _kernel_entry /* Kernel entry point (physical address) */
--
2.42.0
Hi, Tiezhu, Patch-2 and Patch-3 can be squashed. Huacai On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:10 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote: > > When compiling with LLVM and CONFIG_LTO_CLANG is set, there exist the > following objtool warnings: > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x0: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x18: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x38: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x3c: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x40: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x44: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x54: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x58: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x6c: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x84: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x94: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x9c: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xc4: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xf8: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xfc: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x104: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x10c: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x11c: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x120: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x124: unreachable instruction > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x144: unreachable instruction > > All of the above instructions are in arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S, > and there is "OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_head.o := y" in Makefile > to skip objtool checking for head.o, but OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD > does not work for link time validation of vmlinux.o according to > tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt. > > After many discussions, it is not proper to ignore .head.text section > in objtool or put them from text section to data section, so just give > a unwind hint to fix the above warnings. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250814083651.GR4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/ > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAAhV-H6A_swQmqpWHp6ryAEvc96CAMOMd2ZGyJEVNMsJfLkz6w@mail.gmail.com/ > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Suggested-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> > --- > arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S > index e3865e92a917..6ce999586757 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > __HEAD > > _head: > + UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED > .word IMAGE_DOS_SIGNATURE /* "MZ", MS-DOS header */ > .org 0x8 > .dword _kernel_entry /* Kernel entry point (physical address) */ > -- > 2.42.0 >
On 2025/9/17 下午3:04, Huacai Chen wrote: > Hi, Tiezhu, > > Patch-2 and Patch-3 can be squashed. OK, no problem. Thanks, Tiezhu
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 3:23 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote: > > On 2025/9/17 下午3:04, Huacai Chen wrote: > > Hi, Tiezhu, > > > > Patch-2 and Patch-3 can be squashed. > > OK, no problem. And remove the objtool in the subject line because it doesn't modify the objtool code. Huacai > > Thanks, > Tiezhu > >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.