The order of runtime PM API calls in the remove path is wrong.
pm_runtime_put() should be called before pm_runtime_disable(), per the
runtime PM guidelines. Calling pm_runtime_disable() prematurely can
lead to incorrect reference counting and improper device suspend behavior.
Additionally, proper cleanup should be done when rproc_add() fails by
invoking both pm_runtime_put() and pm_runtime_disable() to avoid leaving
the device in an inconsistent power state.
With using devm_pm_runtime_enable() for automatic resource management and
introducing a devres-managed cleanup action imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put() to
enforce correct PM API usage and simplify error paths, the upper two
issues could be fixed. Also print out error log in case of error.
Fixes: a876a3aacc43 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: detect and attach to pre-booted remote cores")
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@toradex.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index bb25221a4a8987ff427d68e2a5535f0e156b0097..12305f36552fb5265b0953a099ea0d561880e3ff 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -1046,6 +1046,13 @@ static int imx_rproc_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put(void *data)
+{
+ struct device *dev = data;
+
+ pm_runtime_put(dev);
+}
+
static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1125,12 +1132,23 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
if (dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
- pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+ ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable runtime PM, %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_put_clk;
+ }
+
ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime get failed: %d\n", ret);
goto err_put_clk;
}
+
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put, dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devm disable pm action: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_put_clk;
+ }
}
ret = rproc_add(rproc);
@@ -1158,10 +1176,6 @@ static void imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
- if (priv->dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
- pm_runtime_disable(priv->dev);
- pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
- }
clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
rproc_del(rproc);
imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
--
2.37.1
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> The order of runtime PM API calls in the remove path is wrong.
> pm_runtime_put() should be called before pm_runtime_disable(), per the
> runtime PM guidelines.
Where is this mentioned? I have looked in [1] and couldn't find anything.
[1]. Documentation/power/runtime_pm.rst
> Calling pm_runtime_disable() prematurely can
> lead to incorrect reference counting and improper device suspend behavior.
>
> Additionally, proper cleanup should be done when rproc_add() fails by
> invoking both pm_runtime_put() and pm_runtime_disable() to avoid leaving
> the device in an inconsistent power state.
>
> With using devm_pm_runtime_enable() for automatic resource management and
> introducing a devres-managed cleanup action imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put() to
> enforce correct PM API usage and simplify error paths, the upper two
> issues could be fixed. Also print out error log in case of error.
>
> Fixes: a876a3aacc43 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: detect and attach to pre-booted remote cores")
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@toradex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index bb25221a4a8987ff427d68e2a5535f0e156b0097..12305f36552fb5265b0953a099ea0d561880e3ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,13 @@ static int imx_rproc_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
> +static void imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put(void *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = data;
> +
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +}
> +
> static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1125,12 +1132,23 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> if (dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
> - pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable runtime PM, %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_put_clk;
> + }
> +
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime get failed: %d\n", ret);
> goto err_put_clk;
> }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put, dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devm disable pm action: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_put_clk;
> + }
> }
>
> ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> @@ -1158,10 +1176,6 @@ static void imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>
> - if (priv->dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
> - pm_runtime_disable(priv->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
> - }
> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> rproc_del(rproc);
> imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:07:08AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: >> The order of runtime PM API calls in the remove path is wrong. >> pm_runtime_put() should be called before pm_runtime_disable(), per the >> runtime PM guidelines. > >Where is this mentioned? I have looked in [1] and couldn't find anything. > >[1]. Documentation/power/runtime_pm.rst > Per this API says: int pm_runtime_disable(struct device *dev);` - increment the device's 'power.disable_depth' field (if the value of that field was previously zero, this prevents subsystem-level runtime PM callbacks from being run for the device), make sure that all of the pending runtime PM operations on the device are either completed or canceled; This implies that pm_runtime_put() should be called before pm_runtime_disable(). Thanks, Peng
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> The order of runtime PM API calls in the remove path is wrong.
> pm_runtime_put() should be called before pm_runtime_disable(), per the
> runtime PM guidelines. Calling pm_runtime_disable() prematurely can
> lead to incorrect reference counting and improper device suspend behavior.
>
> Additionally, proper cleanup should be done when rproc_add() fails by
> invoking both pm_runtime_put() and pm_runtime_disable() to avoid leaving
> the device in an inconsistent power state.
>
> With using devm_pm_runtime_enable() for automatic resource management and
> introducing a devres-managed cleanup action imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put() to
> enforce correct PM API usage and simplify error paths, the upper two
> issues could be fixed. Also print out error log in case of error.
>
> Fixes: a876a3aacc43 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: detect and attach to pre-booted remote cores")
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@toradex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index bb25221a4a8987ff427d68e2a5535f0e156b0097..12305f36552fb5265b0953a099ea0d561880e3ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,13 @@ static int imx_rproc_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
> +static void imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put(void *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = data;
> +
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +}
> +
> static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1125,12 +1132,23 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> if (dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
> - pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable runtime PM, %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_put_clk;
> + }
> +
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime get failed: %d\n", ret);
> goto err_put_clk;
> }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put, dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devm disable pm action: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_put_clk;
> + }
> }
>
> ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> @@ -1158,10 +1176,6 @@ static void imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>
> - if (priv->dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
> - pm_runtime_disable(priv->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
> - }
> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> rproc_del(rproc);
> imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.