fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any
zero-sized extent update.
Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
if (!et)
return;
+ if (unlikely(len == 0)) {
+ f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, "
+ "extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]",
+ __func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len,
+ tei->age, tei->last_blocks);
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (type == EX_READ)
trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len,
tei->blk, 0);
--
2.49.0
Do we need this? On 09/16, Chao Yu wrote: > Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any > zero-sized extent update. > > Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> > --- > fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c > index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c > @@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode, > if (!et) > return; > > + if (unlikely(len == 0)) { > + f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, " > + "extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]", > + __func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len, > + tei->age, tei->last_blocks); > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); > + return; > + } > + > if (type == EX_READ) > trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len, > tei->blk, 0); > -- > 2.49.0
On 9/18/25 00:40, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > Do we need this? I think so, it can provide a way to dump more information to troubleshoot in which function we're trying to update w/ a zero-sized extent. Thanks, > > On 09/16, Chao Yu wrote: >> Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any >> zero-sized extent update. >> >> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> >> --- >> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c >> index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c >> @@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode, >> if (!et) >> return; >> >> + if (unlikely(len == 0)) { >> + f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, " >> + "extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]", >> + __func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len, >> + tei->age, tei->last_blocks); >> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> if (type == EX_READ) >> trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len, >> tei->blk, 0); >> -- >> 2.49.0
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.