fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any
zero-sized extent update.
Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
if (!et)
return;
+ if (unlikely(len == 0)) {
+ f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, "
+ "extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]",
+ __func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len,
+ tei->age, tei->last_blocks);
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (type == EX_READ)
trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len,
tei->blk, 0);
--
2.49.0
Do we need this?
On 09/16, Chao Yu wrote:
> Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any
> zero-sized extent update.
>
> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
> if (!et)
> return;
>
> + if (unlikely(len == 0)) {
> + f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, "
> + "extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]",
> + __func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len,
> + tei->age, tei->last_blocks);
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (type == EX_READ)
> trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len,
> tei->blk, 0);
> --
> 2.49.0
On 9/18/25 00:40, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Do we need this?
I think so, it can provide a way to dump more information to troubleshoot
in which function we're trying to update w/ a zero-sized extent.
Thanks,
>
> On 09/16, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any
>> zero-sized extent update.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>> index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>> @@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>> if (!et)
>> return;
>>
>> + if (unlikely(len == 0)) {
>> + f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, "
>> + "extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]",
>> + __func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len,
>> + tei->age, tei->last_blocks);
>> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (type == EX_READ)
>> trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len,
>> tei->blk, 0);
>> --
>> 2.49.0
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.