Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Add DisplayPort controller binding for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC.
'qcom,sm6150-dp' uses the same controller IP as 'qcom,sm8150-dp'.
Declare 'qcom,sm6150-dp' as a fallback compatible to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'
for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure correct matching and
future clarity.
Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
This series splits the SM6150 dp-controller definition from the
'[v3] Add DisplayPort support for QCS615 platform' series and rebases
'dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add support for 4 pixel streams'.
The devicetree modification for DisplayPort on SM6150 will be provided
in a future patch.
---
Changes in v2:
- Update commit message and binding with fallback configuration. [Dmitry]
- Drop driver patch since SM6150 is declared as a fallback to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250912-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v1-0-02b34b7b719d@oss.qualcomm.com
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..82481519005a1b038a351aa358b9266239d0e8a9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties:
- items:
- enum:
- qcom,sar2130p-dp
+ - qcom,sm6150-dp
- qcom,sm7150-dp
- qcom,sm8150-dp
- qcom,sm8250-dp
---
base-commit: c3067c2c38316c3ef013636c93daa285ee6aaa2e
change-id: 20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-525ac2ed8c86
Best regards,
--
Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:31:35PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > Add DisplayPort controller binding for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC. > 'qcom,sm6150-dp' uses the same controller IP as 'qcom,sm8150-dp'. > Declare 'qcom,sm6150-dp' as a fallback compatible to 'qcom-sm8350-dp' > for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure correct matching and > future clarity. > > Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > This series splits the SM6150 dp-controller definition from the > '[v3] Add DisplayPort support for QCS615 platform' series and rebases > 'dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add support for 4 pixel streams'. > > The devicetree modification for DisplayPort on SM6150 will be provided > in a future patch. > --- > Changes in v2: > - Update commit message and binding with fallback configuration. [Dmitry] > - Drop driver patch since SM6150 is declared as a fallback to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'. > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250912-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v1-0-02b34b7b719d@oss.qualcomm.com > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..82481519005a1b038a351aa358b9266239d0e8a9 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties: > - items: > - enum: > - qcom,sar2130p-dp > + - qcom,sm6150-dp In the review to the previos iteration I think I was a bit explicit: "qcom,sm6150-dp", "qcom,sm8150-dp", "qcom-sm8350-dp". You seemed to agree to it. Now you didn't implemet that. Why? > - qcom,sm7150-dp > - qcom,sm8150-dp > - qcom,sm8250-dp > > --- > base-commit: c3067c2c38316c3ef013636c93daa285ee6aaa2e > change-id: 20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-525ac2ed8c86 > > Best regards, > -- > Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > -- With best wishes Dmitry
On 9/16/2025 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:31:35PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >> Add DisplayPort controller binding for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC. >> 'qcom,sm6150-dp' uses the same controller IP as 'qcom,sm8150-dp'. >> Declare 'qcom,sm6150-dp' as a fallback compatible to 'qcom-sm8350-dp' >> for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure correct matching and >> future clarity. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> This series splits the SM6150 dp-controller definition from the >> '[v3] Add DisplayPort support for QCS615 platform' series and rebases >> 'dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add support for 4 pixel streams'. >> >> The devicetree modification for DisplayPort on SM6150 will be provided >> in a future patch. >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - Update commit message and binding with fallback configuration. [Dmitry] >> - Drop driver patch since SM6150 is declared as a fallback to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'. >> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250912-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v1-0-02b34b7b719d@oss.qualcomm.com >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >> index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..82481519005a1b038a351aa358b9266239d0e8a9 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties: >> - items: >> - enum: >> - qcom,sar2130p-dp >> + - qcom,sm6150-dp > > In the review to the previos iteration I think I was a bit explicit: > "qcom,sm6150-dp", "qcom,sm8150-dp", "qcom-sm8350-dp". You seemed to > agree to it. Now you didn't implemet that. Why? Sorry, I misunderstood your previous comment. I thought the recommendation was only about the commit message, not the binding structure. Does the current implementation mean that qcom,sm6150-dp and qcom,sm8150-dp fallback to "qcom,sm8350-dp"? - items: - enum: - qcom,sar2130p-dp - qcom,sm6150-dp - qcom,sm7150-dp - qcom,sm8150-dp - qcom,sm8250-dp - qcom,sm8450-dp - qcom,sm8550-dp - const: qcom,sm8350-dp Do you mean modifying it as below? - items: - enum: - qcom,sar2130p-dp - qcom,sm6150-dp - qcom,sm7150-dp - qcom,sm8250-dp - qcom,sm8450-dp - qcom,sm8550-dp - const: qcom,sm8150-dp - const: qcom,sm8350-dp >> - qcom,sm7150-dp >> - qcom,sm8150-dp >> - qcom,sm8250-dp >> >> --- >> base-commit: c3067c2c38316c3ef013636c93daa285ee6aaa2e >> change-id: 20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-525ac2ed8c86 >> >> Best regards, >> -- >> Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> >>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 07:25:28PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > > On 9/16/2025 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:31:35PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > >> Add DisplayPort controller binding for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC. > >> 'qcom,sm6150-dp' uses the same controller IP as 'qcom,sm8150-dp'. > >> Declare 'qcom,sm6150-dp' as a fallback compatible to 'qcom-sm8350-dp' > >> for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure correct matching and > >> future clarity. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> --- > >> This series splits the SM6150 dp-controller definition from the > >> '[v3] Add DisplayPort support for QCS615 platform' series and rebases > >> 'dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add support for 4 pixel streams'. > >> > >> The devicetree modification for DisplayPort on SM6150 will be provided > >> in a future patch. > >> --- > >> Changes in v2: > >> - Update commit message and binding with fallback configuration. [Dmitry] > >> - Drop driver patch since SM6150 is declared as a fallback to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'. > >> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250912-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v1-0-02b34b7b719d@oss.qualcomm.com > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > >> index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..82481519005a1b038a351aa358b9266239d0e8a9 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties: > >> - items: > >> - enum: > >> - qcom,sar2130p-dp > >> + - qcom,sm6150-dp > > > > In the review to the previos iteration I think I was a bit explicit: > > "qcom,sm6150-dp", "qcom,sm8150-dp", "qcom-sm8350-dp". You seemed to > > agree to it. Now you didn't implemet that. Why? > > > Sorry, I misunderstood your previous comment. > I thought the recommendation was only about the commit message, not the > binding structure. > > Does the current implementation mean that qcom,sm6150-dp and qcom,sm8150-dp > fallback to "qcom,sm8350-dp"? > - items: > - enum: > - qcom,sar2130p-dp > - qcom,sm6150-dp > - qcom,sm7150-dp > - qcom,sm8150-dp > - qcom,sm8250-dp > - qcom,sm8450-dp > - qcom,sm8550-dp > - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > > Do you mean modifying it as below? I suggested a compat string. Please modify schema accordingly. > - items: > - enum: > - qcom,sar2130p-dp > - qcom,sm6150-dp > - qcom,sm7150-dp > - qcom,sm8250-dp > - qcom,sm8450-dp > - qcom,sm8550-dp > - const: qcom,sm8150-dp > - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > > > >> - qcom,sm7150-dp > >> - qcom,sm8150-dp > >> - qcom,sm8250-dp > >> > >> --- > >> base-commit: c3067c2c38316c3ef013636c93daa285ee6aaa2e > >> change-id: 20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-525ac2ed8c86 > >> > >> Best regards, > >> -- > >> Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> -- With best wishes Dmitry
On 9/16/2025 7:25 PM, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > On 9/16/2025 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:31:35PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >>> Add DisplayPort controller binding for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC. >>> 'qcom,sm6150-dp' uses the same controller IP as 'qcom,sm8150-dp'. >>> Declare 'qcom,sm6150-dp' as a fallback compatible to 'qcom-sm8350-dp' >>> for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure correct matching and >>> future clarity. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> >>> --- >>> This series splits the SM6150 dp-controller definition from the >>> '[v3] Add DisplayPort support for QCS615 platform' series and rebases >>> 'dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add support for 4 pixel streams'. >>> >>> The devicetree modification for DisplayPort on SM6150 will be provided >>> in a future patch. >>> --- >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Update commit message and binding with fallback configuration. [Dmitry] >>> - Drop driver patch since SM6150 is declared as a fallback to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'. >>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250912-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v1-0-02b34b7b719d@oss.qualcomm.com >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >>> index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..82481519005a1b038a351aa358b9266239d0e8a9 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties: >>> - items: >>> - enum: >>> - qcom,sar2130p-dp >>> + - qcom,sm6150-dp >> In the review to the previos iteration I think I was a bit explicit: >> "qcom,sm6150-dp", "qcom,sm8150-dp", "qcom-sm8350-dp". You seemed to >> agree to it. Now you didn't implemet that. Why? > > Sorry, I misunderstood your previous comment. > I thought the recommendation was only about the commit message, not the > binding structure. > > Does the current implementation mean that qcom,sm6150-dp and qcom,sm8150-dp > fallback to "qcom,sm8350-dp"? > - items: > - enum: > - qcom,sar2130p-dp > - qcom,sm6150-dp > - qcom,sm7150-dp > - qcom,sm8150-dp > - qcom,sm8250-dp > - qcom,sm8450-dp > - qcom,sm8550-dp > - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > > Do you mean modifying it as below? > - items: > - enum: > - qcom,sar2130p-dp > - qcom,sm6150-dp > - qcom,sm7150-dp > - qcom,sm8250-dp > - qcom,sm8450-dp > - qcom,sm8550-dp > - const: qcom,sm8150-dp > - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > Or this? - items: - enum: - qcom,sm6150-dp - const: qcom,sm8150-dp - const: qcom,sm8350-dp >>> - qcom,sm7150-dp >>> - qcom,sm8150-dp >>> - qcom,sm8250-dp >>> >>> --- >>> base-commit: c3067c2c38316c3ef013636c93daa285ee6aaa2e >>> change-id: 20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-525ac2ed8c86 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> -- >>> Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> >>>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 07:34:52PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > > On 9/16/2025 7:25 PM, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > > On 9/16/2025 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:31:35PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > >>> Add DisplayPort controller binding for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC. > >>> 'qcom,sm6150-dp' uses the same controller IP as 'qcom,sm8150-dp'. > >>> Declare 'qcom,sm6150-dp' as a fallback compatible to 'qcom-sm8350-dp' > >>> for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure correct matching and > >>> future clarity. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > >>> --- > >>> This series splits the SM6150 dp-controller definition from the > >>> '[v3] Add DisplayPort support for QCS615 platform' series and rebases > >>> 'dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add support for 4 pixel streams'. > >>> > >>> The devicetree modification for DisplayPort on SM6150 will be provided > >>> in a future patch. > >>> --- > >>> Changes in v2: > >>> - Update commit message and binding with fallback configuration. [Dmitry] > >>> - Drop driver patch since SM6150 is declared as a fallback to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'. > >>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250912-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v1-0-02b34b7b719d@oss.qualcomm.com > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > >>> index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..82481519005a1b038a351aa358b9266239d0e8a9 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml > >>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties: > >>> - items: > >>> - enum: > >>> - qcom,sar2130p-dp > >>> + - qcom,sm6150-dp > >> In the review to the previos iteration I think I was a bit explicit: > >> "qcom,sm6150-dp", "qcom,sm8150-dp", "qcom-sm8350-dp". You seemed to > >> agree to it. Now you didn't implemet that. Why? > > > > Sorry, I misunderstood your previous comment. > > I thought the recommendation was only about the commit message, not the > > binding structure. > > > > Does the current implementation mean that qcom,sm6150-dp and qcom,sm8150-dp > > fallback to "qcom,sm8350-dp"? > > - items: > > - enum: > > - qcom,sar2130p-dp > > - qcom,sm6150-dp > > - qcom,sm7150-dp > > - qcom,sm8150-dp > > - qcom,sm8250-dp > > - qcom,sm8450-dp > > - qcom,sm8550-dp > > - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > > > > Do you mean modifying it as below? > > - items: > > - enum: > > - qcom,sar2130p-dp > > - qcom,sm6150-dp > > - qcom,sm7150-dp > > - qcom,sm8250-dp > > - qcom,sm8450-dp > > - qcom,sm8550-dp > > - const: qcom,sm8150-dp > > - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > > > > Or this? > > - items: > - enum: > - qcom,sm6150-dp > - const: qcom,sm8150-dp > - const: qcom,sm8350-dp Yes > > > >>> - qcom,sm7150-dp > >>> - qcom,sm8150-dp > >>> - qcom,sm8250-dp > >>> > >>> --- > >>> base-commit: c3067c2c38316c3ef013636c93daa285ee6aaa2e > >>> change-id: 20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-525ac2ed8c86 > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> -- > >>> Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > >>> -- With best wishes Dmitry
On 9/16/2025 7:37 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 07:34:52PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >> On 9/16/2025 7:25 PM, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >>> On 9/16/2025 6:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:31:35PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >>>>> Add DisplayPort controller binding for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC. >>>>> 'qcom,sm6150-dp' uses the same controller IP as 'qcom,sm8150-dp'. >>>>> Declare 'qcom,sm6150-dp' as a fallback compatible to 'qcom-sm8350-dp' >>>>> for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure correct matching and >>>>> future clarity. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> This series splits the SM6150 dp-controller definition from the >>>>> '[v3] Add DisplayPort support for QCS615 platform' series and rebases >>>>> 'dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add support for 4 pixel streams'. >>>>> >>>>> The devicetree modification for DisplayPort on SM6150 will be provided >>>>> in a future patch. >>>>> --- >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - Update commit message and binding with fallback configuration. [Dmitry] >>>>> - Drop driver patch since SM6150 is declared as a fallback to 'qcom-sm8350-dp'. >>>>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250912-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v1-0-02b34b7b719d@oss.qualcomm.com >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >>>>> index aeb4e4f36044a0ff1e78ad47b867e232b21df509..82481519005a1b038a351aa358b9266239d0e8a9 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >>>>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties: >>>>> - items: >>>>> - enum: >>>>> - qcom,sar2130p-dp >>>>> + - qcom,sm6150-dp >>>> In the review to the previos iteration I think I was a bit explicit: >>>> "qcom,sm6150-dp", "qcom,sm8150-dp", "qcom-sm8350-dp". You seemed to >>>> agree to it. Now you didn't implemet that. Why? >>> Sorry, I misunderstood your previous comment. >>> I thought the recommendation was only about the commit message, not the >>> binding structure. >>> >>> Does the current implementation mean that qcom,sm6150-dp and qcom,sm8150-dp >>> fallback to "qcom,sm8350-dp"? >>> - items: >>> - enum: >>> - qcom,sar2130p-dp >>> - qcom,sm6150-dp >>> - qcom,sm7150-dp >>> - qcom,sm8150-dp >>> - qcom,sm8250-dp >>> - qcom,sm8450-dp >>> - qcom,sm8550-dp >>> - const: qcom,sm8350-dp >>> >>> Do you mean modifying it as below? >>> - items: >>> - enum: >>> - qcom,sar2130p-dp >>> - qcom,sm6150-dp >>> - qcom,sm7150-dp >>> - qcom,sm8250-dp >>> - qcom,sm8450-dp >>> - qcom,sm8550-dp >>> - const: qcom,sm8150-dp >>> - const: qcom,sm8350-dp >>> >> Or this? >> >> - items: >> - enum: >> - qcom,sm6150-dp >> - const: qcom,sm8150-dp >> - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > > Yes Thanks for clarifying, and sorry for the confusion earlier. I will update the binding to use this format in the next patch. >> >>>>> - qcom,sm7150-dp >>>>> - qcom,sm8150-dp >>>>> - qcom,sm8250-dp >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> base-commit: c3067c2c38316c3ef013636c93daa285ee6aaa2e >>>>> change-id: 20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-525ac2ed8c86 >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> -- >>>>> Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> >>>>>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.