Add support MediaTek's Video Companion Processor(VCP) host driver to
control the MediaTek VCP Risc-V coprocessor.

> This series is based on linux-next, tag: next-20250912.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Refactor: split vcp driver patch to mult diff
> - Fix reviewer's comments
> This series patches dependent on:
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20250623120154.109429-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/
> [2]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20250822021217.1598-3-jjian.zhou@mediatek.com/

Xiangzhi Tang (4):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add VCP support for mt8196
  remoterpoc: mediatek: vcp: Add vcp remoteproc driver
  remoterpoc: mediatek: vcp: Add ipi-mbox communication
  remoterpoc: mediatek: vcp: Add vcp suspned and resume feature

 .../remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml       |  165 +++
 drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                    |   12 +
 drivers/remoteproc/Makefile                   |    3 +
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_common.c           | 1015 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_common.h           |  284 +++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_rproc.c            |  544 +++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_rproc.h            |   93 ++
 include/linux/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_public.h     |  141 +++
 include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_sip_svc.h      |    3 +
 9 files changed, 2260 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_common.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_common.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_rproc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_rproc.h
 create mode 100644 include/linux/remoteproc/mtk_vcp_public.h

-- 
2.46.0

On 14/09/2025 14:29, Xiangzhi Tang wrote:
> Add support MediaTek's Video Companion Processor(VCP) host driver to
> control the MediaTek VCP Risc-V coprocessor.
> 
>> This series is based on linux-next, tag: next-20250912.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Refactor: split vcp driver patch to mult diff
>> - Fix reviewer's comments

What exactly changed? That's too vague.

>> This series patches dependent on:
>> [1]
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20250623120154.109429-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/

Why? This received clear feedback that needs changes, so why would you
now send something based on obsolete patchset?



Best regards,
Krzysztof