init/do_mounts_rd.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
The goto label 'successful_load' isn't really necessary. Set 'res = 1'
immediately and let 'goto done' handle the rest.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
init/do_mounts_rd.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/do_mounts_rd.c b/init/do_mounts_rd.c
index ac021ae6e6fa..97ddcdaba893 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts_rd.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts_rd.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int __init rd_load_image(char *from)
if (nblocks == 0) {
if (crd_load(decompressor) == 0)
- goto successful_load;
+ res = 1; /* load successful */
goto done;
}
@@ -264,8 +264,6 @@ int __init rd_load_image(char *from)
}
pr_cont("done.\n");
-successful_load:
- res = 1;
done:
fput(in_file);
noclose_input:
--
2.51.0
Hi, On 2025-09-13 14:15:14 +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: > The goto label 'successful_load' isn't really necessary. Set 'res = 1' > immediately and let 'goto done' handle the rest. > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev> > --- > init/do_mounts_rd.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/init/do_mounts_rd.c b/init/do_mounts_rd.c > index ac021ae6e6fa..97ddcdaba893 100644 > --- a/init/do_mounts_rd.c > +++ b/init/do_mounts_rd.c > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int __init rd_load_image(char *from) > > if (nblocks == 0) { > if (crd_load(decompressor) == 0) > - goto successful_load; > + res = 1; /* load successful */ > goto done; > } This is now the only place where res will be set to 1. > > @@ -264,8 +264,6 @@ int __init rd_load_image(char *from) > } > pr_cont("done.\n"); > > -successful_load: > - res = 1; This does not seem correct? After this patch res is not updated to 1 anymore if execution reaches here without taking another goto, i.e. the return value is changed by this patch. Regards, Klara Modin > done: > fput(in_file); > noclose_input: > -- > 2.51.0 >
On 13. Sep 2025, at 15:11, Klara Modin wrote: > On 2025-09-13 14:15:14 +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: >> The goto label 'successful_load' isn't really necessary. Set 'res = 1' >> immediately and let 'goto done' handle the rest. >> >> No functional changes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev> >> --- >> ... > > This is now the only place where res will be set to 1. Sorry my bad. > This does not seem correct? After this patch res is not updated to 1 anymore > if execution reaches here without taking another goto, i.e. the return > value is changed by this patch. Thanks, I agree that it doesn't make sense. I only intended to delete the label, not the 'res = 1'. Please ignore this patch (unless someone thinks removing the goto label is worth a v2) and sorry for the noise. Thanks, Thorsten
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.