drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c | 9 +++------ drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi-dt.c | 7 +++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Print full device node name with %pOF format, so the code will be a bit
simpler.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c | 9 +++------
drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi-dt.c | 7 +++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
index c4a1d99dfed0..16cf9d15f247 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c
@@ -258,8 +258,7 @@ static int sprd_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
grp = sprd_pinctrl_find_group_by_name(pctl, np->name);
if (!grp) {
- dev_err(pctl->dev, "unable to find group for node %s\n",
- of_node_full_name(np));
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "unable to find group for node %pOF\n", np);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -276,16 +275,14 @@ static int sprd_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
if (ret < 0) {
if (ret != -EINVAL)
dev_err(pctl->dev,
- "%s: could not parse property function\n",
- of_node_full_name(np));
+ "%pOF: could not parse property function\n", np);
function = NULL;
}
ret = pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config(np, pctldev, &configs,
&num_configs);
if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(pctl->dev, "%s: could not parse node property\n",
- of_node_full_name(np));
+ dev_err(pctl->dev, "%pOF: could not parse node property\n", np);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi-dt.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi-dt.c
index 5f13315ebff3..50a16f3bd131 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi-dt.c
@@ -274,8 +274,7 @@ static void fill_pin_function(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
if (!strcmp(pins[pin].pin.name, name))
break;
if (pin == npins) {
- dev_warn(dev, "%s: cannot find pin %s\n",
- of_node_full_name(node), name);
+ dev_warn(dev, "%pOF: cannot find pin %s\n", node, name);
index++;
continue;
}
@@ -283,8 +282,8 @@ static void fill_pin_function(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
/* Read the associated mux value. */
muxval = sunxi_pinctrl_dt_read_pinmux(node, index);
if (muxval == INVALID_MUX) {
- dev_warn(dev, "%s: invalid mux value for pin %s\n",
- of_node_full_name(node), name);
+ dev_warn(dev, "%pOF: invalid mux value for pin %s\n",
+ node, name);
index++;
continue;
}
--
2.48.1
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 11:24 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > Print full device node name with %pOF format, so the code will be a bit > simpler. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Patch applied. For the follow-up remark, I think it's an improvement with the full path, this is better. Yours, Linus Walleij
On 12/09/2025 11:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Print full device node name with %pOF format, so the code will be a bit > simpler. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c | 9 +++------ > drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi-dt.c | 7 +++---- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c > index c4a1d99dfed0..16cf9d15f247 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c > @@ -258,8 +258,7 @@ static int sprd_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > > grp = sprd_pinctrl_find_group_by_name(pctl, np->name); > if (!grp) { > - dev_err(pctl->dev, "unable to find group for node %s\n", > - of_node_full_name(np)); > + dev_err(pctl->dev, "unable to find group for node %pOF\n", np); > return -EINVAL; > } Heh, I misread the docs and see now in the testing that my patch changes the behavior. of_node_full_name() is just node name. pOF is full path. This might be desired (more accurate warning in case many nodes share similar name) or not... Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.