Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset
and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features
(e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it
explicitly ensures future compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 },
{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 },
--
2.34.1
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
> Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset
> and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features
> (e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it
SM6150 supports MST as far as I can see.
> explicitly ensures future compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 },
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On 9/12/2025 7:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
>> Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset
>> and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features
>> (e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it
> SM6150 supports MST as far as I can see.
Yes, but since msm_dp_desc hasn't been mainlined with MST enabled yet,
I went ahead and submitted it with this commit message.
>> explicitly ensures future compatibility.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 },
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:53:50PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
>
> On 9/12/2025 7:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
> >> Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset
> >> and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features
> >> (e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it
> > SM6150 supports MST as far as I can see.
>
>
> Yes, but since msm_dp_desc hasn't been mainlined with MST enabled yet,
> I went ahead and submitted it with this commit message.
The commit message is misleading: it makes one think that SC7180
supports MST, while SM6150 doesn't.
>
>
> >> explicitly ensures future compatibility.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = {
> >> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
> >> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
> >> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 },
> >> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
> >> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
> >> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 },
> >> { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 },
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.