Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset
and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features
(e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it
explicitly ensures future compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 },
{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 },
--
2.34.1
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset > and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features > (e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it SM6150 supports MST as far as I can see. > explicitly ensures future compatibility. > > Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = { > { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 }, > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 }, > > -- > 2.34.1 > -- With best wishes Dmitry
On 9/12/2025 7:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >> Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset >> and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features >> (e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it > SM6150 supports MST as far as I can see. Yes, but since msm_dp_desc hasn't been mainlined with MST enabled yet, I went ahead and submitted it with this commit message. >> explicitly ensures future compatibility. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >> index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c >> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = { >> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp }, >> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp }, >> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 }, >> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 }, >> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 }, >> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 }, >> { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 }, >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:53:50PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > > On 9/12/2025 7:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: > >> Add support for SM6150 DisplayPort controller, which shares base offset > >> and configuration with SC7180. While SM6150 lacks some SC7180 features > >> (e.g. HBR3, MST), current msm_dp_desc_sc7180 data is sufficient. Listing it > > SM6150 supports MST as far as I can see. > > > Yes, but since msm_dp_desc hasn't been mainlined with MST enabled yet, > I went ahead and submitted it with this commit message. The commit message is misleading: it makes one think that SC7180 supports MST, while SM6150 doesn't. > > > >> explicitly ensures future compatibility. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > >> index d87d47cc7ec3eb757ac192c411000bc50b824c59..ddb22b50490035779904d4cab20e2fee7e0f9657 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c > >> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_dp_dt_match[] = { > >> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp }, > >> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc8280xp }, > >> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sdm845 }, > >> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6150-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 }, > >> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sc7180 }, > >> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_sm8650 }, > >> { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dp", .data = &msm_dp_desc_x1e80100 }, > >> > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > >> -- With best wishes Dmitry
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.