Use the devres capabilities to cleanup the driver remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
index d6d0d4300f540268a3ab4a6b14af685f7b93275a..a7e6554ca223e2e980caf2e2dea832db9ad60ed6 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
@@ -2264,6 +2264,13 @@ static struct dma_chan *sdma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
ofdma->of_node);
}
+static void sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action(void *data)
+{
+ struct sdma_engine *sdma = data;
+
+ of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node);
+}
+
static void sdma_dma_device_unregister_action(void *data)
{
struct sdma_engine *sdma = data;
@@ -2408,6 +2415,12 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action, sdma);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to register of-dma-controller unregister hook\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
/*
* Because that device tree does not encode ROM script address,
* the RAM script in firmware is mandatory for device tree
@@ -2431,7 +2444,6 @@ static void sdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct sdma_engine *sdma = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
int i;
- of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node);
/* Kill the tasklet */
for (i = 0; i < MAX_DMA_CHANNELS; i++) {
struct sdma_channel *sdmac = &sdma->channel[i];
--
2.47.3
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:56:50PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > Use the devres capabilities to cleanup the driver remove() callback. > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de> > --- > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > index d6d0d4300f540268a3ab4a6b14af685f7b93275a..a7e6554ca223e2e980caf2e2dea832db9ad60ed6 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > @@ -2264,6 +2264,13 @@ static struct dma_chan *sdma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, > ofdma->of_node); > } > > +static void sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action(void *data) > +{ > + struct sdma_engine *sdma = data; > + > + of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node); > +} > + > static void sdma_dma_device_unregister_action(void *data) > { > struct sdma_engine *sdma = data; > @@ -2408,6 +2415,12 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return ret; > } > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action, sdma); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to register of-dma-controller unregister hook\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + return dev_err_probe() Frank > /* > * Because that device tree does not encode ROM script address, > * the RAM script in firmware is mandatory for device tree > @@ -2431,7 +2444,6 @@ static void sdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct sdma_engine *sdma = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > int i; > > - of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node); > /* Kill the tasklet */ > for (i = 0; i < MAX_DMA_CHANNELS; i++) { > struct sdma_channel *sdmac = &sdma->channel[i]; > > -- > 2.47.3 >
On 25-09-12, Frank Li wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:56:50PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > > Use the devres capabilities to cleanup the driver remove() callback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de> > > --- > > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > index d6d0d4300f540268a3ab4a6b14af685f7b93275a..a7e6554ca223e2e980caf2e2dea832db9ad60ed6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > @@ -2264,6 +2264,13 @@ static struct dma_chan *sdma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, > > ofdma->of_node); > > } > > > > +static void sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action(void *data) > > +{ > > + struct sdma_engine *sdma = data; > > + > > + of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node); > > +} > > + > > static void sdma_dma_device_unregister_action(void *data) > > { > > struct sdma_engine *sdma = data; > > @@ -2408,6 +2415,12 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return ret; > > } > > > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action, sdma); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to register of-dma-controller unregister hook\n"); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > return dev_err_probe() Please check my last patch. Regards, Marco > > Frank > > /* > > * Because that device tree does not encode ROM script address, > > * the RAM script in firmware is mandatory for device tree > > @@ -2431,7 +2444,6 @@ static void sdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > struct sdma_engine *sdma = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > int i; > > > > - of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node); > > /* Kill the tasklet */ > > for (i = 0; i < MAX_DMA_CHANNELS; i++) { > > struct sdma_channel *sdmac = &sdma->channel[i]; > > > > -- > > 2.47.3 > > >
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 05:28:09PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > On 25-09-12, Frank Li wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:56:50PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > > > Use the devres capabilities to cleanup the driver remove() callback. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de> > > > --- > > > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > > index d6d0d4300f540268a3ab4a6b14af685f7b93275a..a7e6554ca223e2e980caf2e2dea832db9ad60ed6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > > > @@ -2264,6 +2264,13 @@ static struct dma_chan *sdma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, > > > ofdma->of_node); > > > } > > > > > > +static void sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action(void *data) > > > +{ > > > + struct sdma_engine *sdma = data; > > > + > > > + of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node); > > > +} > > > + > > > static void sdma_dma_device_unregister_action(void *data) > > > { > > > struct sdma_engine *sdma = data; > > > @@ -2408,6 +2415,12 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, sdma_dma_of_dma_controller_unregister_action, sdma); > > > + if (ret) { > > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to register of-dma-controller unregister hook\n"); > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + > > > > return dev_err_probe() > > Please check my last patch. You can use dev_err_probe() here, last patch only convert exist one. Avoid add A, then remove A later. Frank > > Regards, > Marco > > > > > Frank > > > /* > > > * Because that device tree does not encode ROM script address, > > > * the RAM script in firmware is mandatory for device tree > > > @@ -2431,7 +2444,6 @@ static void sdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > struct sdma_engine *sdma = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > > int i; > > > > > > - of_dma_controller_free(sdma->dev->of_node); > > > /* Kill the tasklet */ > > > for (i = 0; i < MAX_DMA_CHANNELS; i++) { > > > struct sdma_channel *sdmac = &sdma->channel[i]; > > > > > > -- > > > 2.47.3 > > > > >
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:56:50PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: >Use the devres capabilities to cleanup the driver remove() callback. > >Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.