[PATCH v8 08/23] slab: allow NUMA restricted allocations to use percpu sheaves

Vlastimil Babka posted 23 patches 3 weeks, 1 day ago
[PATCH v8 08/23] slab: allow NUMA restricted allocations to use percpu sheaves
Posted by Vlastimil Babka 3 weeks, 1 day ago
Currently allocations asking for a specific node explicitly or via
mempolicy in strict_numa node bypass percpu sheaves. Since sheaves
contain mostly local objects, we can try allocating from them if the
local node happens to be the requested node or allowed by the mempolicy.
If we find the object from percpu sheaves is not from the expected node,
we skip the sheaves - this should be rare.

Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
 mm/slub.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 9699d048b2cd08ee75c4cc3d1e460868704520b1..3746c0229cc2f9658a589416c63c21fbf2850c44 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4888,18 +4888,43 @@ __pcs_replace_empty_main(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs,
 }
 
 static __fastpath_inline
-void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp)
+void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, int node)
 {
 	struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs;
+	bool node_requested;
 	void *object;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	if (static_branch_unlikely(&strict_numa)) {
-		if (current->mempolicy)
-			return NULL;
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&strict_numa) &&
+			 node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
+
+		struct mempolicy *mpol = current->mempolicy;
+
+		if (mpol) {
+			/*
+			 * Special BIND rule support. If the local node
+			 * is in permitted set then do not redirect
+			 * to a particular node.
+			 * Otherwise we apply the memory policy to get
+			 * the node we need to allocate on.
+			 */
+			if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND ||
+					!node_isset(numa_mem_id(), mpol->nodes))
+
+				node = mempolicy_slab_node();
+		}
 	}
 #endif
 
+	node_requested = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && node != NUMA_NO_NODE;
+
+	/*
+	 * We assume the percpu sheaves contain only local objects although it's
+	 * not completely guaranteed, so we verify later.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(node_requested && node != numa_mem_id()))
+		return NULL;
+
 	if (!local_trylock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock))
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -4911,7 +4936,21 @@ void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp)
 			return NULL;
 	}
 
-	object = pcs->main->objects[--pcs->main->size];
+	object = pcs->main->objects[pcs->main->size - 1];
+
+	if (unlikely(node_requested)) {
+		/*
+		 * Verify that the object was from the node we want. This could
+		 * be false because of cpu migration during an unlocked part of
+		 * the current allocation or previous freeing process.
+		 */
+		if (folio_nid(virt_to_folio(object)) != node) {
+			local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	pcs->main->size--;
 
 	local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
 
@@ -5011,8 +5050,8 @@ static __fastpath_inline void *slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list
 	if (unlikely(object))
 		goto out;
 
-	if (s->cpu_sheaves && node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
-		object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags);
+	if (s->cpu_sheaves)
+		object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags, node);
 
 	if (!object)
 		object = __slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node, addr, orig_size);

-- 
2.51.0
Re: [PATCH v8 08/23] slab: allow NUMA restricted allocations to use percpu sheaves
Posted by Suren Baghdasaryan 1 week ago
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 1:01 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Currently allocations asking for a specific node explicitly or via
> mempolicy in strict_numa node bypass percpu sheaves. Since sheaves
> contain mostly local objects, we can try allocating from them if the
> local node happens to be the requested node or allowed by the mempolicy.
> If we find the object from percpu sheaves is not from the expected node,
> we skip the sheaves - this should be rare.
>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>

> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 9699d048b2cd08ee75c4cc3d1e460868704520b1..3746c0229cc2f9658a589416c63c21fbf2850c44 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4888,18 +4888,43 @@ __pcs_replace_empty_main(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs,
>  }
>
>  static __fastpath_inline
> -void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp)
> +void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, int node)
>  {
>         struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs;
> +       bool node_requested;
>         void *object;
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -       if (static_branch_unlikely(&strict_numa)) {
> -               if (current->mempolicy)
> -                       return NULL;
> +       if (static_branch_unlikely(&strict_numa) &&
> +                        node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> +
> +               struct mempolicy *mpol = current->mempolicy;
> +
> +               if (mpol) {
> +                       /*
> +                        * Special BIND rule support. If the local node
> +                        * is in permitted set then do not redirect
> +                        * to a particular node.
> +                        * Otherwise we apply the memory policy to get
> +                        * the node we need to allocate on.
> +                        */
> +                       if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND ||
> +                                       !node_isset(numa_mem_id(), mpol->nodes))
> +
> +                               node = mempolicy_slab_node();
> +               }
>         }
>  #endif
>
> +       node_requested = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && node != NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * We assume the percpu sheaves contain only local objects although it's
> +        * not completely guaranteed, so we verify later.
> +        */
> +       if (unlikely(node_requested && node != numa_mem_id()))
> +               return NULL;
> +
>         if (!local_trylock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock))
>                 return NULL;
>
> @@ -4911,7 +4936,21 @@ void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp)
>                         return NULL;
>         }
>
> -       object = pcs->main->objects[--pcs->main->size];
> +       object = pcs->main->objects[pcs->main->size - 1];
> +
> +       if (unlikely(node_requested)) {
> +               /*
> +                * Verify that the object was from the node we want. This could
> +                * be false because of cpu migration during an unlocked part of
> +                * the current allocation or previous freeing process.
> +                */
> +               if (folio_nid(virt_to_folio(object)) != node) {
> +                       local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> +                       return NULL;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       pcs->main->size--;
>
>         local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
>
> @@ -5011,8 +5050,8 @@ static __fastpath_inline void *slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list
>         if (unlikely(object))
>                 goto out;
>
> -       if (s->cpu_sheaves && node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> -               object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags);
> +       if (s->cpu_sheaves)
> +               object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags, node);
>
>         if (!object)
>                 object = __slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node, addr, orig_size);
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>