When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly
subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are
released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages
are NULL.
This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and
then recently reported by David.
Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/
Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
__free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags);
else if (!head) {
pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1);
- while (order-- > 0)
+ while (order-- > 0) {
+ /*
+ * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order
+ * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings
+ * mark them as empty.
+ */
+ clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order));
__free_frozen_pages(page + (1 << order), order,
fpi_flags);
+ }
}
}
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages > are NULL. > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and > then recently reported by David. > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/ > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages > are NULL. > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and > then recently reported by David. > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/ > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> > --- > mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order, > __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags); > else if (!head) { > pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1); > - while (order-- > 0) > + while (order-- > 0) { > + /* > + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order > + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings > + * mark them as empty. > + */ > + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order)); Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it happening already? > __free_frozen_pages(page + (1 << order), order, > fpi_flags); > + } > } > } > > -- > 2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog >
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:01 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly > > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are > > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages > > are NULL. > > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and > > then recently reported by David. > > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/ > > > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com> > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> > > --- > > mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order, > > __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags); > > else if (!head) { > > pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1); > > - while (order-- > 0) > > + while (order-- > 0) { > > + /* > > + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order > > + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings > > + * mark them as empty. > > + */ > > + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order)); > > Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it > happening already? Pages released with release_pages() should have valid tags, so I expect no warnings. > > > __free_frozen_pages(page + (1 << order), order, > > fpi_flags); > > + } > > } > > } > > > > -- > > 2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog > > >
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:01 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly > > > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are > > > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages > > > are NULL. > > > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and > > > then recently reported by David. > > > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty. > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/ > > > > > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> > > > --- > > > mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644 > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order, > > > __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags); > > > else if (!head) { > > > pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1); > > > - while (order-- > 0) > > > + while (order-- > 0) { > > > + /* > > > + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order > > > + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings > > > + * mark them as empty. > > > + */ > > > + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order)); > > > > Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it > > happening already? > > Pages released with release_pages() should have valid tags, so I > expect no warnings. > Oh so this is orthogonal to your first patch which is replacing __free_page with release_pages(). This non-compound high-order page is not an issue in the codepath vm_module_tags_populate(), correct?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:45 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:01 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly > > > > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are > > > > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages > > > > are NULL. > > > > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and > > > > then recently reported by David. > > > > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty. > > > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/ > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> > > > > --- > > > > mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644 > > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order, > > > > __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags); > > > > else if (!head) { > > > > pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1); > > > > - while (order-- > 0) > > > > + while (order-- > 0) { > > > > + /* > > > > + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order > > > > + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings > > > > + * mark them as empty. > > > > + */ > > > > + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order)); > > > > > > Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it > > > happening already? > > > > Pages released with release_pages() should have valid tags, so I > > expect no warnings. > > > > Oh so this is orthogonal to your first patch which is replacing > __free_page with release_pages(). This non-compound high-order page is > not an issue in the codepath vm_module_tags_populate(), correct? Yes, these are independent fixes.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.