When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly
subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are
released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages
are NULL.
This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and
then recently reported by David.
Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/
Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
__free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags);
else if (!head) {
pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1);
- while (order-- > 0)
+ while (order-- > 0) {
+ /*
+ * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order
+ * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings
+ * mark them as empty.
+ */
+ clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order));
__free_frozen_pages(page + (1 << order), order,
fpi_flags);
+ }
}
}
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages > are NULL. > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and > then recently reported by David. > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/ > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly
> subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are
> released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages
> are NULL.
> This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and
> then recently reported by David.
> Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/
>
> Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
> __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags);
> else if (!head) {
> pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1);
> - while (order-- > 0)
> + while (order-- > 0) {
> + /*
> + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order
> + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings
> + * mark them as empty.
> + */
> + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order));
Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it
happening already?
> __free_frozen_pages(page + (1 << order), order,
> fpi_flags);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:01 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly
> > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are
> > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages
> > are NULL.
> > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and
> > then recently reported by David.
> > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
> > __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags);
> > else if (!head) {
> > pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1);
> > - while (order-- > 0)
> > + while (order-- > 0) {
> > + /*
> > + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order
> > + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings
> > + * mark them as empty.
> > + */
> > + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order));
>
> Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it
> happening already?
Pages released with release_pages() should have valid tags, so I
expect no warnings.
>
> > __free_frozen_pages(page + (1 << order), order,
> > fpi_flags);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
> >
>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:01 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly
> > > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are
> > > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages
> > > are NULL.
> > > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and
> > > then recently reported by David.
> > > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644
> > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
> > > __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags);
> > > else if (!head) {
> > > pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1);
> > > - while (order-- > 0)
> > > + while (order-- > 0) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order
> > > + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings
> > > + * mark them as empty.
> > > + */
> > > + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order));
> >
> > Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it
> > happening already?
>
> Pages released with release_pages() should have valid tags, so I
> expect no warnings.
>
Oh so this is orthogonal to your first patch which is replacing
__free_page with release_pages(). This non-compound high-order page is
not an issue in the codepath vm_module_tags_populate(), correct?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:45 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:01 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > When freeing "tail" pages of a non-compount high-order page, we properly
> > > > subtract the allocation tag counters, however later when these pages are
> > > > released, alloc_tag_sub() will issue warnings because tags for these pages
> > > > are NULL.
> > > > This issue was originally anticipated by Vlastimil in his review [1] and
> > > > then recently reported by David.
> > > > Prevent warnings by marking the tags empty.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6db0f0c8-81cb-4d04-9560-ba73d63db4b8@suse.cz/
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > index 1760346bbd24..d21a411e807e 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > @@ -5240,9 +5240,16 @@ static void ___free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
> > > > __free_frozen_pages(page, order, fpi_flags);
> > > > else if (!head) {
> > > > pgalloc_tag_sub_pages(tag, (1 << order) - 1);
> > > > - while (order-- > 0)
> > > > + while (order-- > 0) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * The "tail" pages of this non-compound high-order
> > > > + * page will have no code tags, so to avoid warnings
> > > > + * mark them as empty.
> > > > + */
> > > > + clear_page_tag_ref(page + (1 << order));
> > >
> > > Do we need something similar for the release_pages() code path or is it
> > > happening already?
> >
> > Pages released with release_pages() should have valid tags, so I
> > expect no warnings.
> >
>
> Oh so this is orthogonal to your first patch which is replacing
> __free_page with release_pages(). This non-compound high-order page is
> not an issue in the codepath vm_module_tags_populate(), correct?
Yes, these are independent fixes.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.