When a guest issues a cpuid instruction for Fn0000000D_{x00,x01}, the
hypervisor will be intercepting the CPUID instruction and will need to access
the guest XSS value. For SEV-ES, the XSS value is encrypted and needs to be
included in the GHCB to be visible to the hypervisor.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c
index 2c0ab0fdc060..079fffdb12c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#ifndef __BOOT_COMPRESSED
+#define has_cpuflag(f) boot_cpu_has(f)
+#endif
+
static enum es_result vc_check_opcode_bytes(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
unsigned long exit_code)
{
@@ -452,6 +456,13 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_cpuid(struct ghcb *ghcb,
/* xgetbv will cause #GP - use reset value for xcr0 */
ghcb_set_xcr0(ghcb, 1);
+ if (has_cpuflag(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) && regs->ax == 0xd && regs->cx <= 1) {
+ struct msr m;
+
+ raw_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_XSS, &m);
+ ghcb_set_xss(ghcb, m.q);
+ }
+
ret = sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(ghcb, ctxt, SVM_EXIT_CPUID, 0, 0);
if (ret != ES_OK)
return ret;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
index 17f6c3fedeee..0581c477d466 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
@@ -701,5 +701,6 @@ DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(sw_exit_info_1)
DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(sw_exit_info_2)
DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(sw_scratch)
DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(xcr0)
+DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(xss)
#endif
--
2.47.3
On 9/8/25 15:20, John Allen wrote: > When a guest issues a cpuid instruction for Fn0000000D_{x00,x01}, the > hypervisor will be intercepting the CPUID instruction and will need to access > the guest XSS value. For SEV-ES, the XSS value is encrypted and needs to be > included in the GHCB to be visible to the hypervisor. > > Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com> > --- > arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c > index 2c0ab0fdc060..079fffdb12c0 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c > +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/vc-shared.c > @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +#ifndef __BOOT_COMPRESSED > +#define has_cpuflag(f) boot_cpu_has(f) > +#endif > + > static enum es_result vc_check_opcode_bytes(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt, > unsigned long exit_code) > { > @@ -452,6 +456,13 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_cpuid(struct ghcb *ghcb, > /* xgetbv will cause #GP - use reset value for xcr0 */ > ghcb_set_xcr0(ghcb, 1); > > + if (has_cpuflag(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) && regs->ax == 0xd && regs->cx <= 1) { Just a nit, but I wonder if we should be generic here and just do has_cpuflag(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) since that should be set if shadow stack is enabled, right? And when X86_FEATURE_XSAVES is set, we don't intercept XSS access (see sev_es_recalc_msr_intercepts()). Thoughts? Thanks, Tom > + struct msr m; > + > + raw_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_XSS, &m); > + ghcb_set_xss(ghcb, m.q); > + } > + > ret = sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(ghcb, ctxt, SVM_EXIT_CPUID, 0, 0); > if (ret != ES_OK) > return ret; > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h > index 17f6c3fedeee..0581c477d466 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h > @@ -701,5 +701,6 @@ DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(sw_exit_info_1) > DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(sw_exit_info_2) > DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(sw_scratch) > DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(xcr0) > +DEFINE_GHCB_ACCESSORS(xss) > > #endif
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.