Alignment operations are very common in the kernel. Since they are
always performed using a power-of-two value, enforcing this invariant
through a dedicated type leads to fewer bugs and can improve the
generated code.
Introduce the `Alignment` type, inspired by the nightly Rust type of the
same name and providing the same interface, and a new `Alignable` trait
allowing unsigned integers to be aligned up or down.
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
---
rust/kernel/lib.rs | 2 +
rust/kernel/ptr.rs | 226 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 228 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/lib.rs b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
index fcffc3988a90392f1d5fc19f15c75d9ba7104f9a..833bb070e9a6697dad93ba10c61f5dd52da70f35 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
// the unstable features in use.
//
// Stable since Rust 1.79.0.
+#![feature(generic_nonzero)]
#![feature(inline_const)]
#![feature(pointer_is_aligned)]
//
@@ -111,6 +112,7 @@
pub mod platform;
pub mod prelude;
pub mod print;
+pub mod ptr;
pub mod rbtree;
pub mod regulator;
pub mod revocable;
diff --git a/rust/kernel/ptr.rs b/rust/kernel/ptr.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf419d2ec61d3850b47c4d86ff2132f13b7b60f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rust/kernel/ptr.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+//! Types and functions to work with pointers and addresses.
+
+use core::fmt::Debug;
+use core::mem::align_of;
+use core::num::NonZero;
+
+use crate::build_error;
+
+/// Type representing an alignment, which is always a power of two.
+///
+/// It is used to validate that a given value is a valid alignment, and to perform masking and
+/// alignment operations.
+///
+/// This is a temporary substitute for the [`Alignment`] nightly type from the standard library,
+/// and to be eventually replaced by it.
+///
+/// [`Alignment`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102070
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// An alignment is always a power of two.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
+pub struct Alignment(NonZero<usize>);
+
+impl Alignment {
+ /// Validates that `ALIGN` is a power of two at build-time, and returns an [`Alignment`] of the
+ /// same value.
+ ///
+ /// A build error is triggered if `ALIGN` is not a power of two.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::Alignment;
+ ///
+ /// let v = Alignment::new::<16>();
+ /// assert_eq!(v.as_usize(), 16);
+ /// ```
+ #[inline(always)]
+ pub const fn new<const ALIGN: usize>() -> Self {
+ if ALIGN.is_power_of_two() {
+ // INVARIANT: `align` is a power of two.
+ // SAFETY: `align` is a power of two, and thus non-zero.
+ Self(unsafe { NonZero::new_unchecked(ALIGN) })
+ } else {
+ build_error!("Provided alignment is not a power of two.");
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Validates that `align` is a power of two at runtime, and returns an
+ /// [`Alignment`] of the same value.
+ ///
+ /// Returns [`None`] if `align` is not a power of two.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::Alignment;
+ ///
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new_checked(16), Some(Alignment::new::<16>()));
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new_checked(15), None);
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new_checked(1), Some(Alignment::new::<1>()));
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new_checked(0), None);
+ /// ```
+ #[inline(always)]
+ pub const fn new_checked(align: usize) -> Option<Self> {
+ if align.is_power_of_two() {
+ // INVARIANT: `align` is a power of two.
+ // SAFETY: `align` is a power of two, and thus non-zero.
+ Some(Self(unsafe { NonZero::new_unchecked(align) }))
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Returns the alignment of `T`.
+ ///
+ /// This is equivalent to [`align_of`], but with the return value provided as an [`Alignment`].
+ #[inline(always)]
+ pub const fn of<T>() -> Self {
+ // This cannot panic since alignments are always powers of two.
+ //
+ // We unfortunately cannot use `new` as it would require the `generic_const_exprs` feature.
+ const { Alignment::new_checked(align_of::<T>()).unwrap() }
+ }
+
+ /// Returns this alignment as a `usize`.
+ ///
+ /// It is guaranteed to be a power of two.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::Alignment;
+ ///
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new::<16>().as_usize(), 16);
+ /// ```
+ #[inline(always)]
+ pub const fn as_usize(self) -> usize {
+ self.as_nonzero().get()
+ }
+
+ /// Returns this alignment as a [`NonZero`].
+ ///
+ /// It is guaranteed to be a power of two.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::Alignment;
+ ///
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new::<16>().as_nonzero().get(), 16);
+ /// ```
+ #[inline(always)]
+ pub const fn as_nonzero(self) -> NonZero<usize> {
+ // Allow the compiler to know that the value is indeed a power of two. This can help
+ // optimize some operations down the line, like e.g. replacing divisions by bit shifts.
+ if !self.0.is_power_of_two() {
+ // SAFETY: per the invariants, `self.0` is always a power of two so this block will
+ // never be reached.
+ unsafe { core::hint::unreachable_unchecked() }
+ }
+ self.0
+ }
+
+ /// Returns the base-2 logarithm of the alignment.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::Alignment;
+ ///
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::of::<u8>().log2(), 0);
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new::<16>().log2(), 4);
+ /// ```
+ #[inline(always)]
+ pub const fn log2(self) -> u32 {
+ self.0.ilog2()
+ }
+
+ /// Returns the mask for this alignment.
+ ///
+ /// This is equivalent to `!(self.as_usize() - 1)`.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::Alignment;
+ ///
+ /// assert_eq!(Alignment::new::<0x10>().mask(), !0xf);
+ /// ```
+ #[inline(always)]
+ pub const fn mask(self) -> usize {
+ // No underflow can occur as the alignment is guaranteed to be a power of two, and thus is
+ // non-zero.
+ !(self.as_usize() - 1)
+ }
+}
+
+/// Trait for items that can be aligned against an [`Alignment`].
+pub trait Alignable: Sized {
+ /// Aligns `self` down to `alignment`.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::{Alignable, Alignment};
+ ///
+ /// assert_eq!(0x2f_usize.align_down(Alignment::new::<0x10>()), 0x20);
+ /// assert_eq!(0x30usize.align_down(Alignment::new::<0x10>()), 0x30);
+ /// assert_eq!(0xf0u8.align_down(Alignment::new::<0x1000>()), 0x0);
+ /// ```
+ fn align_down(self, alignment: Alignment) -> Self;
+
+ /// Aligns `self` up to `alignment`, returning `None` if aligning would result in an overflow.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// use kernel::ptr::{Alignable, Alignment};
+ ///
+ /// assert_eq!(0x4fusize.align_up(Alignment::new::<0x10>()), Some(0x50));
+ /// assert_eq!(0x40usize.align_up(Alignment::new::<0x10>()), Some(0x40));
+ /// assert_eq!(0x0usize.align_up(Alignment::new::<0x10>()), Some(0x0));
+ /// assert_eq!(u8::MAX.align_up(Alignment::new::<0x10>()), None);
+ /// assert_eq!(0x10u8.align_up(Alignment::new::<0x100>()), None);
+ /// assert_eq!(0x0u8.align_up(Alignment::new::<0x100>()), Some(0x0));
+ /// ```
+ fn align_up(self, alignment: Alignment) -> Option<Self>;
+}
+
+/// Implement [`Alignable`] for unsigned integer types.
+macro_rules! impl_alignable_uint {
+ ($($t:ty),*) => {
+ $(
+ impl Alignable for $t {
+ #[inline(always)]
+ fn align_down(self, alignment: Alignment) -> Self {
+ // The operands of `&` need to be of the same type so convert the alignment to
+ // `Self`. This means we need to compute the mask ourselves.
+ ::core::num::NonZero::<Self>::try_from(alignment.as_nonzero())
+ .map(|align| self & !(align.get() - 1))
+ // An alignment larger than `Self` always aligns down to `0`.
+ .unwrap_or(0)
+ }
+
+ #[inline(always)]
+ fn align_up(self, alignment: Alignment) -> Option<Self> {
+ let aligned_down = self.align_down(alignment);
+ if self == aligned_down {
+ Some(aligned_down)
+ } else {
+ Self::try_from(alignment.as_usize())
+ .ok()
+ .and_then(|align| aligned_down.checked_add(align))
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ )*
+ };
+}
+
+impl_alignable_uint!(u8, u16, u32, u64, usize);
--
2.51.0
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:26 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote: > > + if ALIGN.is_power_of_two() { > + // INVARIANT: `align` is a power of two. > + // SAFETY: `align` is a power of two, and thus non-zero. > + Self(unsafe { NonZero::new_unchecked(ALIGN) }) > + } else { > + build_error!("Provided alignment is not a power of two."); > + } Would `build_assert!` at the top work instead? > + /// Returns this alignment as a `usize`. Intra-doc link. > + // SAFETY: per the invariants, `self.0` is always a power of two so this block will "Per". I can pick this, with or without the user -- or do you need this in Nova this cycle? Thanks! Cheers, Miguel
Hi Miguel, On Mon Sep 8, 2025 at 11:21 PM JST, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:26 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote: >> >> + if ALIGN.is_power_of_two() { >> + // INVARIANT: `align` is a power of two. >> + // SAFETY: `align` is a power of two, and thus non-zero. >> + Self(unsafe { NonZero::new_unchecked(ALIGN) }) >> + } else { >> + build_error!("Provided alignment is not a power of two."); >> + } > > Would `build_assert!` at the top work instead? Oops, it certainly would. > >> + /// Returns this alignment as a `usize`. > > Intra-doc link. > >> + // SAFETY: per the invariants, `self.0` is always a power of two so this block will > > "Per". > > I can pick this, with or without the user -- or do you need this in > Nova this cycle? With -rc6 approaching, I don't think we will merge any Nova code taking advantage of this for this cycle, so please feel free to take this patch. We can then merge patch 2 through drm-rust after -rc1 is released. Should I send a new revision with your fixes, or will you apply them?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote: > > With -rc6 approaching, I don't think we will merge any Nova code taking > advantage of this for this cycle, so please feel free to take this > patch. We can then merge patch 2 through drm-rust after -rc1 is > released. Sure, sounds good. I can also take patch 2 already as a user of this if you prefer (ideally with an Acked-by). > Should I send a new revision with your fixes, or will you apply them? I can, no worries, thanks! Cheers, Miguel
On Tue Sep 9, 2025 at 9:21 AM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote: >> >> With -rc6 approaching, I don't think we will merge any Nova code taking >> advantage of this for this cycle, so please feel free to take this >> patch. We can then merge patch 2 through drm-rust after -rc1 is >> released. > > Sure, sounds good. I can also take patch 2 already as a user of this > if you prefer (ideally with an Acked-by). Yeah, this way around make much more sense, Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
On Tue Sep 9, 2025 at 4:21 PM JST, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 9:05 AM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote: >> >> With -rc6 approaching, I don't think we will merge any Nova code taking >> advantage of this for this cycle, so please feel free to take this >> patch. We can then merge patch 2 through drm-rust after -rc1 is >> released. > > Sure, sounds good. I can also take patch 2 already as a user of this > if you prefer (ideally with an Acked-by). Ah right, you will want to introduce a user for this new API. Sure, feel free to take patch 2 as well! Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.