The function vgic_flush_lr_state() was calling _raw_spin_unlock()
instead of the proper raw_spin_unlock().

_raw_spin_unlock() is an internal low-level API and should not
be used directly; using raw_spin_unlock() ensures proper locking
semantics in the vgic code.

This change replaces low-level API usage with the general kernel
spinlock API, avoiding misuse of internal functions and aligning
with kernel locking conventions.

Fixes: 8fa3adb8c6be ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make vgic_irq->irq_lock a raw_spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index f5148b38120a..c74d6120a12c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static void vgic_flush_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		 * the AP list has been sorted already.
 		 */
 		if (multi_sgi && irq->priority > prio) {
-			_raw_spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
 			break;
 		}
 
-- 
2.50.1

[removing @arm.com addresses that haven't been in use for a very long
time]

On Sun, 07 Sep 2025 21:14:13 +0100,
Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> The function vgic_flush_lr_state() was calling _raw_spin_unlock()

s/was/is/

> instead of the proper raw_spin_unlock().
>
> _raw_spin_unlock() is an internal low-level API and should not
> be used directly; using raw_spin_unlock() ensures proper locking
> semantics in the vgic code.
> 
> This change replaces low-level API usage with the general kernel
> spinlock API, avoiding misuse of internal functions and aligning
> with kernel locking conventions.

This paragraph doesn't add much, please drop it.

> 
> Fixes: 8fa3adb8c6be ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make vgic_irq->irq_lock a raw_spinlock")
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
> index f5148b38120a..c74d6120a12c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static void vgic_flush_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		 * the AP list has been sorted already.
>  		 */
>  		if (multi_sgi && irq->priority > prio) {
> -			_raw_spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> +			raw_spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  

With the above fixed:

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

On 9/8/2025 1:46 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
>> index f5148b38120a..c74d6120a12c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
>> @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static void vgic_flush_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   		 * the AP list has been sorted already.
>>   		 */
>>   		if (multi_sgi && irq->priority > prio) {
>> -			_raw_spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
>> +			raw_spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
>>   			break;
>>   		}
>>   
> With the above fixed:
> 
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier<maz@kernel.org>


Thanks Marc, I will send v2 with your suggestions.

Thanks,
Alok