On 07/09/2025 11:43, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> нд, 7 вер. 2025 р. о 12:34 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> пише:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 04:53:23PM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>> Tegra30 has CSI pad clock enable bits embedded into PLLD/PLLD2 registers.
>>> Add ids for these clocks. Additionally, move TEGRA30_CLK_CLK_MAX into
>>> clk-tegra30 source.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 1 +
>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra30-car.h | 3 ++-
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
>>> index ca367184e185..ca738bc64615 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
>>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>>> #define SYSTEM_CLK_RATE 0x030
>>>
>>> #define TEGRA30_CLK_PERIPH_BANKS 5
>>> +#define TEGRA30_CLK_CLK_MAX 311
>>
>> Unused define drop.
>>
>
> Specify, your comment is not clear.
>
>> Also, don't mix bindings and drivers. You cannot create such
>> dependencies.
>
> I literally did what you told me to do! TEGRA30_CLK_CLK_MAX was
> removed from binding, but it is used by the driver, so how you propose
I missed that you remove here old CLK_MAX... well, you did it quite
different than all other cases leading to driver-binding dependency.
Really, I thought you will just fix it immediately after my feedback and
then new bindings come later, just like we did for every other SoC.
> to handle this without redefining TEGRA30_CLK_CLK_MAX and breaking
> build with missing TEGRA30_CLK_CLK_MAX?
There is really no problem there and if you put here at least some
effort you would see how everyone else did it - add define to the driver
in cleanup series, month ago or so and then change bindings.
Fine to do it that way
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof