Currently uprobe syscall handles all errors with forcing SIGILL to current
process. As suggested by Andrii it'd be helpful for uprobe syscall detection
to return error value for the !in_uprobe_trampoline check.

This way we could just call uprobe syscall and based on return value we will
find out if the kernel has it.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 0a8c0a4a5423..845aeaf36b8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uprobe)
 
 	/* Allow execution only from uprobe trampolines. */
 	if (!in_uprobe_trampoline(regs->ip))
-		goto sigill;
+		return -ENXIO;
 
 	err = copy_from_user(&args, (void __user *)regs->sp, sizeof(args));
 	if (err)
-- 
2.51.0

On 09/05, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> Currently uprobe syscall handles all errors with forcing SIGILL to current
> process. As suggested by Andrii it'd be helpful for uprobe syscall detection
> to return error value for the !in_uprobe_trampoline check.
>
> This way we could just call uprobe syscall and based on return value we will
> find out if the kernel has it.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 0a8c0a4a5423..845aeaf36b8d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uprobe)
>
>  	/* Allow execution only from uprobe trampolines. */
>  	if (!in_uprobe_trampoline(regs->ip))
> -		goto sigill;
> +		return -ENXIO;

I agree.

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>