hi,
as suggested by Andrii [1] it'd be helpful for uprobe syscall
detection to return error value for the !in_uprobe_trampoline
check instead of forcing SIGILL.

This way we could just call uprobe syscall and based on return
value we will find out if the kernel supports it.

Alejandro,
I included the full man page change from [2], because IIUC this
was not applied yet, and as usual I butchered the wording, so I'd
appreciate your review on that.

thanks,
jirka


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaxtW_W1M94e3q0Qw4vM_heHqU7zFeH-fFHOQBwy5+7LQ@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250720112133.244369-23-jolsa@kernel.org/
---
Jiri Olsa (2):
      uprobes/x86: Return error from uprobe syscall when not called from trampoline
      selftests/bpf: Fix uprobe_sigill test for uprobe syscall error value

 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c                               |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 34 ++++++----------------------------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Jiri Olsa (1):
      man2: Add uprobe syscall page

 man/man2/uprobe.2    |  1 +
 man/man2/uretprobe.2 | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 man/man2/uprobe.2